Favelas Demand Olympic Attention

Favelas Demand Olympic Attention

The displacement and mistreatment of poor communities characterize the dark side of the Olympic games.
2
views

There are two types of development in Rio that characterize two vastly different lives. You can see the contrast on google maps. There's the organized grids that line the coast. Then there's the favelas. Growing out of the hills of Rio, these favelas are homes that were built by people who couldn't afford the developed housing. Brazil has one of the largest national income inequality gaps and it is evident in the communities of Rio. Many of these favelas were founded by freed slaves. The slave trade to Brazil used to be eleven times greater than the United States. Just Rio alone had a greater slave population than all of the south before the United States Civil War. As Rio continued to grow, the demand for labor also brought in many workers from other regions that added to the settlements in the hills. Favelas are fully functioning cities within cities. 25% of Rio residents live in these communities. Since these favelas were not built under permits, they also have make-shift electricity, sewage, and water systems.

Favelas lack of governance leads to community led networks that tend to be especially conducive to vibrant streets filled with art and strong community networks. But many of the top dogs of Brazil see the poverty as inconvenient to development goals. Carlos Carbalhi, owner of over of 6 million square meters of land in an area known as Barra, has developed this land to the current Olympic park. The mayor of Rio has also directed tens of billions of tax funds towards this new infrastructure. His vision was for Barra and much of Rio is to have a city that is cleared of poor communities. He said in an interview with the guardian, "We think that if the standards were lowered, we would be taking away from what the city – the new city – could represent on the global scene as a city of the elite, of good taste. For this reason, it needed to be noble housing, not housing for the poor.” The infrastructure of the Olympic housing operation was meant to accentuate just that. This development will also become luxury apartments after the games. Maybe it has to do with his generous checks to the mayor's campaign or his financial investments in the game, but his goals of relocating the poor came quickly.

It began with bus routes changing. Northern Rio, where the poorer communities live, stopped having access to the iconic southern beaches. Caralhi and other wealthy elite didn't want barefoot people, poor people, hungry people from the favela slums to challenge the value of their real estate investments. People near the areas of planned developments began finding eviction notices on their doors. Relocations of favela communities happened in masses. People were moved inland far out of sight of the tourists. Many people accepted the new housing and checks from the government easily. Since the announcement of Rio hosting of the Olympic games, 200,000 people have been relocated away from their homes. This is a map of the communities that were targeted.

But not all of the communities wanted to leave so willingly. Villa Autródromo is an area that isn't in Olympic park, but is visible from the borders of it. It had 600 families that came together during the relocation and stated to the city that they did not want to move. So the city responded with force. In the United States, there has been a vehement dialogue relating to police brutality. However, the rates of death are nothing compared to Brazil. In the U.S. there is 1 death out of every 37,000 arrests, but in Brazil that number is as high as 1 death in every 23 arrests. Although many of the homes in Villa Autródromo were destroyed, people still refused to leave and are still resisting even today.

Now there are only 20 families left. For those last 20, the city finally allowed them to stay on the condition that they have their old homes rebuilt into new more aesthetically pleasing homes. Is this the real face of the legacy that the Olympics brings a nation?

The displacement and disregard of locals seems to be one that has characterized the history of the Olympics. It happened in Bejing, London, Athens, Atlanta and just about every place that has ever hosted. Concerns about negative international attention have historically caused the relocation and hiding of poorer peoples. In the book The Best Olympics Ever?, Lenskyj argues that hosting the Olympics causes privileged members of society to benefit largely and the underclass to bear a disproportionate load of the burden. They face gentrification and therefore displacement. They economically far worse off after the games than before. There have been protest groups like Canada's 'Bread not Circus' that successfully opposed the reallocation of healthcare, welfare, and environmental budgets to the Olympic games. The Impact of the Olympics on Community Coalition (IOCC) arose in Sydney to protect the poor and the environment. This has been a pattern of the Olympics because of the government commitment of money to these games while neglecting urgent social needs.

The recommendation that the IOCC protests for are calls to protect the people through accountability and transparency. They ask these three things:

1. Give the People a Choice (not just the elites)
2. Provide Information on the true costs of the bid
3. Maximize Benefits for Local Citizens

But instead these communities are met with a wall, built between them and the road from the airport.

Thank you to Vox for the amazing two part documentary covering these events. I used their on-the-grounds research and some of their photography for this article. Specific citations are linked, but check out these two videos for full coverage of the dark side of the Rio Olympics:

</center>
</center><span id="selection-marker-1" class="redactor-selection-marker" data-verified="redactor"></span>
Cover Image Credit: Vox

Popular Right Now

3 Reasons Why Step Dads Are Super Dads

22017
views

I often hear a lot of people complaining about their step-parents and wondering why they think that they have any authority over them. Although I know that everyone has different situations, I will be the first to admit that I am beyond blessed to have a step dad. Yep, I said it. My life wouldn't be the same that it is not without him in it. Let me tell you why I think step dads are the greatest things since sliced bread.

1. They will do anything for you, literally.

My stepdad has done any and every thing for me. From when I was little until now. He was and still is my go-to. If I was hungry, he would get me food. If something was broken, he would fix it. If I wanted something, he would normally always find a way to get it. He didn't spoil me (just sometimes), but he would make sure that I was always taken care of.

SEE ALSO: The Thank You That Step-Parents Deserve

2. Life lessons.

Yup, the tough one. My stepdad has taught me things that I would have never figured out on my own. He has stood beside me through every mistake. He has been there to pick me up when I am down. My stepdad is like the book of knowledge: crazy hormonal teenage edition. Boy problems? He would probably make me feel better. He just always seemed to know what to say. I think that the most important lesson that I have learned from my stepdad is: to never give up. My stepdad has been through three cycles of leukemia. He is now in remission, yay!! But, I never heard him complain. I never heard him worry and I never saw him feeling sorry for himself. Through you, I found strength.

3. He loved me as his own.

The big one, the one that may seem impossible to some step parents. My stepdad is not actually my stepdad, but rather my dad. I will never have enough words to explain how grateful I am for this man, which is why I am attempting to write this right now. It takes a special kind of human to love another as if they are their own. There had never been times where I didn't think that my dad wouldn't be there for me. It was like I always knew he would be. He introduces me as his daughter, and he is my dad. I wouldn't have it any other way. You were able to show me what family is.

So, dad... thanks. Thanks for being you. Thanks for being awesome. Thanks for being strong. Thanks for loving me. Thanks for loving my mom. Thanks for giving me a wonderful little sister. Thanks for being someone that I can count on. Thanks for being my dad.

I love you!

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Tiger Is Back And 2019 Is Starting To Look Up

Tiger Woods might now have the greatest comeback story in sports history.

210
views

It's no secret that Tiger Woods means a lot to the game of golf. I wrote about his influence back in September when he achieved his one and only tournament win in 2018, first since 2013. I did, however, celebrate his win with a caveat of sorts: I wouldn't say he was back.

In golf, no one cares about how big your prize purse is, how many endorsements you've got or even how many tournaments you win. A golfer's career is measured by how many Majors they win. So for me, I couldn't claim Tiger was back until he secured at least one more Major victory before he decided to hang up the clubs for good.

But now, with a Masters championship under his belt and another green jacket to hang in the closet, I can safely say without a doubt in my mind that Tiger is back.

The biggest question with Tiger was whether or not he could carry the momentum from his Tour Championship into the Masters. Tiger has gotten our hopes up before, but things felt different the moment Tiger claimed that first tournament win in what felt like forever.

And honestly, there's no better way for the world's biggest golfer than in the world's biggest tournament. The "Tiger Effect" is very real, and the numbers are there to prove it. Despite having to tee off early for the final round with threesomes instead of duos to avoid storms, the Masters still delivered incredibly high TV ratings as Tiger played his way into contention the past few days. According to CBS, the final round of the Masters delivered a 7.7 rating which is the highest it's been in 34 years. I'll never forget where I was when Tiger won his fifth green jacket, and I'm certainly not alone in saying that.

So what does this mean for Tiger's legacy? For one, the argument of "can Tiger win another major before he retires" can finally be put to rest. I'm not a huge fan of the talking heads in the sports industry, but watching this video of the slue of bad Tiger takes just brings a smile to my face. It also resurfaces the Jack Nicklaus debate as the greatest golfer of all time. Having now secured his 15th Major win, breaking Nicklaus' record at 18 Major wins seems entirely possible. Statistically, Tiger winning another Major is not outside of the realm of possibility. Julius Boros was the oldest player to win a Major at 48, so Tiger at 43 theoretically gives him another five years. One thing's for sure, the entire sports world will be watching.

Related Content

Facebook Comments