Much has been said about the differences between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Sanders supporters have been quick to criticize Clinton for her big money ties, while Clinton supporters have criticized Sanders for being too idealistic and simplifying complex issues. While debate on these issues is necessary and allows for our democracy to reach its full potential, I’m urging Democrats to be more cautious about the language we’re using to talk about these candidates. The truth is, the Democratic party is presented with two fine candidates with plenty of experience in Washington that could be elected at a pivotal time for our country where many important decision will be made. Now that each has a primary victory, it's time that we consider how those decisions might pan out.
Among the many important decisions our next president will have to make, perhaps one of the most critical could be the appointing of new Supreme Court Justices.
Four of the current justices are over 70 years old, one is over 80 years old, and the other three of that original group will all celebrate their 80th birthdays during the next presidential term. Justices Scalia, Thompson, and Kennedy have all served 25 years at least in the court. We are apt to face significant changes in the makeup of this court very soon as these Justices begin to seek retirement.
Electing a president who will appoint responsible Justices is imperative in this election cycle. Justices who will not overturn major Court decisions that have defended the constitutionality of The Affordable Care Act and the legalization of same-sex marriage will allow our country to progress in an appropriate manner. Both Clinton and Sanders are likely to appoint such Justices. Cruz, Trump, Rubio, Carson, Bush, and whoever else is running in the Republican party these days, are not. Regardless of who clenches the nomination, we need to make sure we can rally behind the candidate to protect this progress.
In addition, at stake are the critical power of the veto. Progressive legislation will be virtually impossible with most, if not all, of the Republican candidates who would have the ability to strike down whatever they see fit. The traction that Sanders has created on the campaign trail could reasonably lead to the introduction of progressive legislature, regardless of the election results. With one of the Republicans at the reins, this legislation will not be able to move. With Clinton or Sanders, there is a better chance.
It's undeniable that Sanders has a more progressive track record than Clinton. As a fellow self-described democratic socialist, I'm apt to side with Sanders on many issues. I find myself impressed by his unwavering passion for the issues he believes in and his defense of the middle class. However, I strongly believe that a Clinton presidency will be marked by responsible use of executive powers that further our country, especially when compared to the potentials of a Cruz or Trump presidency.
