A Diplomatic Boycott Of T​he Olympics Is Not Enough to Inspire Change
Start writing a post

A Diplomatic Boycott Of T​he Olympics Is Not Enough to Inspire Change

The US government announced that it will diplomatically boycott the 2022 Olympics in Beijing. Here's why it hasn't worked in the past.

A Diplomatic Boycott Of T​he Olympics Is Not Enough to Inspire Change
Getty Images

Earlier this week, with less than two months until the official beginning of the 2022 Beijing Olympic Winter Games, President Joe Biden announced a ‘diplomatic boycott’ of the games due to China’s abuses against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang and anti-democratic crackdown in Hong Kong. The UK, Australia, and Canada will soon follow suit in implementing the act.

The boycott is not an all-out boycott from the games – athletes will still be able to compete and represent their countries. The only change from the normal scape of things is that diplomatic officials from boycotting countries will not make the trip from their respective countries to China. Even with many diplomats not attending the games, all major sponsors for the games have kept relatively quiet and will continue to sponsor the games, thus making the boycott more symbolic than financial.

This is not the first time that the Olympics will be held in China – with Beijing also being the host city for the 2008 Summer Games. But, President Xi Jinping has stated that he still wants to signal international prestige to the world and his domestic audience, especially amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Those politicians who clamor to boycott for political self-interest are showing off and hyping things up, no one cares whether they come or not,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement. The relations between China and the USA seem to get more heated by the hour, and the U.S.’ boycott may serve as a symbolic act, but in retrospect, it does nothing for the issues they care about.

Going back to 1980, the USA under President Jimmy Carter boycotted the Summer Olympics in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The decision backfired and received a negative public backlash – athletes who only had one shot at qualifying for the biggest sporting event in the world - and in their lives - didn’t have a chance to compete. To make matters worse, the Soviets swept up many of the medals that the Americans would have won at the games and did nothing to sway any form of policy within the Soviet Union. It ended up being a great use of propaganda for the Soviet Union against the United States in the most heated part of the Cold War era.

According to Nicholas Sarantakes, who wrote a book on Jimmy Carter and the 1980 boycott, “The things that motivate nation-states are far more significant than how many gold medals you win… It’s been tried several times. And it fails every time.” The U.S. boycott for 2022 is not nearly as severe as the one from 1980 but allows the U.S. to firmly have its stance on the human rights issues within China. The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic committees are separate entities from the U.S. government, and the U.S. government only disallowing representatives from their jurisdiction allows for a less messy process.

The theme from every boycott of Olympic games, whether it be diplomatic or all-out, is that little change arises from boycotts. Yes, companies may not gain as many viewers on their broadcasts from the U.S., but that does little to the countries that are targeted in the first place. There are better ways for a government to stand against human rights violations other than boycotting an Olympics. The track record of boycotting a major sporting event to inspire global change is not impressive – having a stance on an issue is fine, but diplomacy cannot be met by hiding in the shadows.

The Olympics have always stood as a grounds in which all people, no matter what country, can be equal. It is one of the greatest, if not the greatest events in sports because it brings people from every corner of the world together on a massive stage. So, boycotting the games diplomatically does not feel correct. Human rights issues in China are a huge deal, and the U.S. government is making a decision in the correct direction, albeit the wrong action. A diplomatic boycott, nor any boycott at all, has proven to cause much change in international diplomacy.

From Your Site Articles
Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

Is Meaningful Casual Sex A Paradox?

Why noncommittal sex is more complicated than we'd like to think.


I lost my virginity to a graduate student from Los Angeles. We’d met at a rundown cafe whose Yelp page complained of an alleged rat infestation. His name was Ken and he was 25. What drew me to him was the peculiar way his mouth was perpetually fixed into a sideways, half-moon shape that was like a smirk but without any trace of smugness. But the two most striking parts of Ken by far were the dinner plate roundness of his face and his small, expressionless teddy bear eyes. Of the things that mattered to him, there was his best friend, a college dropout who sold computer parts in Toronto, and sex.

Keep Reading... Show less

A Conversation About Sex

"Sex is a part of nature. I go along with nature." - Marilyn Monroe

Thinking Beyond Barriers

There it is. Even though I'm not around you, I can feel it. Was there a flutter of embarrassment in your mind when you saw the word sex in this article’s title? Did you look over your shoulder to ensure nobody was around before you began to read this?

Keep Reading... Show less

13 Signs You Are A True Cancer Of The Zodiac

Calling all babies born June 21st - July 22nd!

My Astral Life

I'm the first to admit that I am one of THOSE people who uses their zodiac sign as a description of themselves. I realize not everyone believes in astrology-related anything, and there are plenty of people who don't fit their signs. However, I'm one of the people who truly fits their sign to a tee. I'm a Cancer, a Crab, a Moon Child. It's currently our season fellow Crabs! So without further ado, here are all of the signs that you're a Cancer.

Keep Reading... Show less

The Blessing of Lacking Sex Appeal

To all the fellow non "it" girls out there


Lacking sex appeal is not a desirable thing. It makes you fee not ugly, but wrong. Not having charisma is not a life goal. It doesn't make you fee friendless, but isolated. Not being the "it" girl happens, and tonight (and every nigh prior to this)

Keep Reading... Show less

Confessions From the Single Friend of the Group

It is truly the worst place to be

Confessions From the Single Friend of the Group

Look. If you are anything like me, complaining about being single is such a hard thing to because you are genuinely happy for your friends, but as they continue to be happy in their relationships, the ever crushing weight of being the single friends can become overwhelming. For context, my primary friend group consists of four people. We are all roommates and it is a great time here. All three of my roommates have boyfriends/girlfriends, which makes our friend group of four quickly jump to seven, and it is wonderful! I love my roommates so much and I love their S.O's, but no matter how much I love them I always get extremely jealous and sad. The sad thing is that the only part that ever truly ends up bugging me is that since I am single, they are my go-to top priorities and it has been really hard to watch myself slip from the top of their go-to's to not being their go to when they feel the weight of the world. What makes it harder is that expressing that I feel alone and unwanted makes me sound jealous and like I don't want my friends to hangout with their people. I get it. I do. But there are just days I want to be someone's first pick and I'm not.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments