Even though we attend the University of Alabama, there are many things we fail to know about our school.Learn some history and fun facts about the University of Alabama.After attending the University of Alabama for four years, you would think one would know everything there is to know about the school and its history. However, Alabama is a very history-rich campus, and there is a lot to learn. Here are fifteen things you probably don't already know about the University of Alabama.
1. The legend, Paul Bear Bryant, said he'd "croak in a week" if he were to stop coaching. Sure enough, he passed away only 27 days after his final game.
2. The nickname "Crimson Tide" was made popular by Zipp Newman following an Alabama vs. Auburn game. The teams played in a "sea" of red mud and the underdogs, Alabama, tied the game 6-6.
3. The first Alabama vs. Auburn game was played on February 22, 1893.
4. The University of Alabama has a men and women's wheelchair basketball program. This program is one of four in the country!
5. The President's mansion is one of seven to survive the burning of the campus by Union troops in 1865. It was protected by the the president's wife.
6. There are rumors that there is an underground passageway linking the President's mansion to Gorgas library.
7. Contrary to popular belief, you will NOT receive free tuition if you are hit by a university bus.
8. UA's Greek system is the largest in the country, by membership.
9. There is a rare books collection at Hoole Library with the earliest print dating back to 1493.
10. That pile of bricks next to the sidewalk leading to Lloyd Hall? Those are a marker of Madison Hall, an antebellum dorm burned by Union troops in 1865. The bricks were the only thing left of the building and the formation was constructed in 1975 after the site was first excavated.
11. If you graduate from the University of Alabama having never had below a 4.0 GPA, you will graduate wearing a red cap instead of black.
12. Up until 1847, Tuscaloosa was the capital of Alabama.
13. The Alabama Museum of Natural History is located in Smith Hall.
14. The famous bell tower, Denny Chimes, was built in 1929 in honor of President George H. Denny. The structure is made of Virginia bricks to honor Denny's home state, and the rest is constructed with Alabama limestone.
15. The Gorgas House located near Gorgas library was the first structure built on campus in 1829. Like the President's mansion, it survived the burning by the Union troops. The Gorgas House used to serve as a dining hall for students.
Welcome back
Sign in to comment to your favorite stories, participate in your community and interact with your friends
or
LOG IN WITH FACEBOOKNo account? Create one
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
StableDiffusion
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Sports
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
