The Comics Code: An Early Moral Panic

The Comics Code: An Early Moral Panic

The 1950s anti-comic book movement changed the industry - and is not unlike media controversies today.
730
views

Popular culture has been linked to politics since the beginning of civilization. Roman emperors would attend gladiator fights, writers would parody current events, and so on. In the modern era, one of the most politicized mediums has been, surprisingly, the comic book. With characters and stories like X-Men and Watchmen being used as political commentary in times of civil controversies and unrest, it usually comes down to just being a minor discussion, then we move onto something else. Yet this was not the case in post World War II America. In 1954 , Fredric Wertham, a child psychologist who often worked in crime-ridden and low-income areas, published his book Seduction of the Innocent, which stated that comics are the reason for children's involvement with criminal activity. The industry still sees some effects of this book and the controversy it started, and it translates very well to modern issues over pop culture.

During World War II, comic books were among the most popular forms of entertainment. They were cheap to produce, printed on newsprint type paper, and could be recycled for the war effort or traded among readers to get the most out of the books. Superman, Captain America, Wonder Woman, and Namor all fought the Axis forces in the pages of their respective titles. Crates of comics were sent to soldiers on deployment, as it was cheaper to send a weekly box of comics with the supply drops than it was a full USO show. Yet when the war ended, sales began to drop. People no longer felt the need to have larger-than-life heroes fighting villains on the four-color pages. The superhero genre fell, though some characters were able to keep popularity, most notably Batman and Superman, due to movie serials, television (in the case of Superman), and radio. The stories started to take a less violent turn, with many Batman and Detective Comics stories featuring Batman and Robin going against more “out-there” villains – and of course, infamous scenes of the two sleeping in the very close together beds in Wayne Manor. Characters like The Flash and the Justice Society of America ceased publication within a few years after the end of the war. Beyond the remaining superhero comics, the most popular genres became Western, crime, and horror. EC Comics, the publisher of the satire magazine/comic Mad, was publishing graphic horror and crime comics such as Tales from the Crypt and Crime SuspenStories. These comics had images of gruesome (for the time) violence and sexual innuendo, but were still popular with children, as there was no laws/rules saying kids couldn't purchase the books – often to the anger of parents.

Meanwhile, Wertham had noticed the “obscene” images in the books, and saw that the children at correctional facilities he worked in had exposure or were regular readers of comics. He believed that Batman and Robin were gay partners, that horror and crime comics were making kids want to commit crime, and so on. His only claim that was never really refuted was that Wonder Woman had heavy bondage messages, which was actually true – her weakness was being tied up by a man, and the creator, William Moulton Marston, completely intended for this to be the meaning. In 195x, Wertham published his infamous book, Seduction of the Innocent, alleging that comics were ruining the minds of America's youth. The book was a major success, selling countless copies, all while beginning to scare the industry, dominated at this point by DC Comics, EC, and Charlton Comics (Marvel was under the name of Atlas, and a minor company after the war). Sales fell even further, some shops refused to sell comics to minors, people gathered to burn stacks of comics in public. Despite the book's success, there are countless issues with Wertham's findings – he used a single sample size of only children at behavioral or other mental health facilities for his investigation; he did not actually read many of the comics themselves, only looking at selected panels without context; used only titles to gather information, among other logical missteps. This caught the attention of Congress, who organized a committee to hear the cases made by Wertham in 1955.

During the Congressional hearings, publishers were called in to testify. William Gaines, the man in charge of EC, was asked if his publications were in “bad taste.” He famously argued that they were in fact good taste, because while cover of one of his comics that showed a decapitated head, Crime SuspenStories #22, the gore wasn't too extreme. When the committee said there was in fact blood dripping from the mouth, Gaines simply responded by saying “a little.” Internally at the companies' offices, meetings and discussions were being had over what to do. They didn't want the government to interfere in their work, but they also wanted to be able to stay in business. The major publishers got together, and decided that in order to save themselves, they have to personally be policing their works. The Comics Code Authority was formed in 1954 and put strict regulations on the content, such as no depictions of drugs and that good must always triumph over evil in the end. This was strictly voluntary with no legal requirement, but publishers stuck to it for the sake of keeping themselves clean. As this was done during the early days of the investigations, some publishers used this as a way of showing Congress that they will be policing their content. The committee elected to let the companies be, and Wertham's credibility was being called into question. This, coupled with the first appearance of the new Flash in Showcase #4, started the Silver Age of Comic Books, lasting until the early 1970s. All was not well though with EC, and due to the backlash over their stories and Gaines' opposition to the Comics Code, the company went bankrupt in 1956, selling off all assets to other publishers.

Of course, this instantly became very limiting on what the writers could do. For example, any drug reference would make the comic “non-approved,” thus leading to a general lack of major PSA comics about drug abuse. Gay characters were strictly forbidden, as was any mention of sexuality beyond dating or marriage. Even certain words were banned, like “zombie” and “wolfman.” This led to a 1970 incident the Comics Code not approving a story in House of Secrets #83 written by Marv Wolfman, as the story started by saying it was told by a “wolfman.” DC argued that if it was made clear that the actual writer's name was legally Wolfman, the Code would have to approve it. They agreed, DC started to give credit to writers (something they were not really known for) – and in the end, the Code allowed for the horror-type words to be used, paving the way for Marvel's Werewolf By Night. On the drug/alcohol issue, Stan Lee was commissioned by the United States government to write a mainstream anti-drug story featuring one of Marvel's popular characters. He went on to write Amazing Spider-Man #--, in which Harry Osborn, the second Green Goblin, dies of a drug overdose – the Code would not approve the issue, so it was published without the seal of approval. The success of the issue caused the ruling to be changed, so as long as drugs were seen as a bad thing, they were allowed in, thus leading to DC's 1971 iconic “Snowbirds Don't Fly” in Green Lantern/Green Arrow #85-86.

Slowly, the Code became more and more relaxed. It more or less became a “well, if you want to” kind of approval – if it was sent through, it would get the seal and maybe a “parental guidence suggested” label for the shop to put up, if that. Dark Horse Comics rarely sent in their publications, as they allowed any writer/artist to put out anything and keep all rights (that's a different story for another time). Around 2001, Marvel abandoned the use of the Code and instead created their own rating system – All Audiences, Teen, Parental Advisory, and MAX, the latter of which was reserved for a specific imprint that included the hit Punisher relaunch and Alias (the first series to feature Jessica Jones). MAX comics were darker, and sold only to adults, oftentimes being kept behind the counter away from the other titles as to not be accidentally handled by a child. At the other companies, comic stories were also getting more adult/teen centric, but the Code let anything through with few exceptions. DC, Archie, and Bongo (publishers of The Simpsons comics) continued to send comics in, but the Comic Code Authority's staff left the group, leaving only a single person to read everything over. Bongo left the use of the Code in 2010, and by early 2011, DC also left the Code, using their own form of the Marvel ratings system, followed shortly by Archie, thus ending the Comics Code Authority altogether. Longtime opponent of movements and books like Seduction of the Innocent, the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (CBLDF) bought the copyright to the Comics Code name and logo, using it in their works usually in parody or to symbolize hysteria over comic content.

Fast forward to now. While there are not too many organizations against comic books, many find other mediums to argue against. Video game violence has been a debate ever since the release of Doom and Columbine, Internet security and safety is constantly discussed in schools, and even movies and television shows are met with controversy. The Netflix series 13 Reasons Why is being banned from talking about in schools, groups are calling for Netflix to take down the show, and some even wanting to make it set up so that only users over 18 can see it – which really doesn't make sense, considering most people under 18 are simply using a profile on an account paid for by someone else. The problem is not the content, but the context in which said content is shown. A comic book such as the horror series Escape from Jesus Island is targeted to an older audience, and if you're buying it for the first time in a comic shop, without a doubt they'll tell you that it's very graphic and disturbing. Really, it just comes down to what the reader/viewer is comfortable with – if you don't like graphic violence, don't watch Game of Thrones, but if you do, then go for it. Groups like the Comics Code Authority, while helpful and a decent check system, usually end up completely ruining creativity, as stories must be “safe.” We'll always have our media controversies, and eventually, they'll just be seen as a small aspect of the overall cultural history – something that is always evolving.



Cover Image Credit: Comics Code Authority

Popular Right Now

To The Girl Struggling With Her Body Image

It's not about the size of your jeans, but the size of your heart, soul, and spirit.

695265
views

To the girl struggling with her body image,

You are more than the number on the scale. You are more than the number on your jeans and dresses. You are way more than the number of pounds you've gained or lost in whatever amount of time.

Weight is defined as the quantity of matter contained by a body or object. Weight does not define your self-worth, ambition or potential.

So many girls strive for validation through the various numbers associated with body image and it's really so sad seeing such beautiful, incredible women become discouraged over a few numbers that don't measure anything of true significance.

Yes, it is important to live a healthy lifestyle. Yes, it is important to take care of yourself. However, taking care of yourself includes your mental health as well. Neglecting either your mental or physical health will inflict problems on the other. It's very easy to get caught up in the idea that you're too heavy or too thin, which results in you possibly mistreating your body in some way.

Your body is your special, beautiful temple. It harbors all of your thoughts, feelings, characteristics, and ideas. Without it, you wouldn't be you. If you so wish to change it in a healthy way, then, by all means, go ahead. With that being said, don't make changes to impress or please someone else. You are the only person who is in charge of your body. No one else has the right to tell you whether or not your body is good enough. If you don't satisfy their standards, then you don't need that sort of negative influence in your life. That sort of manipulation and control is extremely unhealthy in its own regard.

Do not hold back on things you love or want to do because of how you interpret your body. You are enough. You are more than enough. You are more than your exterior. You are your inner being, your spirit. A smile and confidence are the most beautiful things you can wear.

It's not about the size of your jeans. It's about the size of your mind and heart. Embrace your body, observe and adore every curve, bone and stretch mark. Wear what makes you feel happy and comfortable in your own skin. Do your hair and makeup (or don't do either) to your heart's desire. Wear the crop top you've been eyeing up in that store window. Want a bikini body? Put a bikini on your body, simple.

So, as hard as it may seem sometimes, understand that the number on the scale doesn't measure the amount or significance of your contributions to this world. Just because that dress doesn't fit you like you had hoped doesn't mean that you're any less of a person.

Love your body, and your body will love you right back.

Cover Image Credit: Lauren Margliotti

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

This One’s For Africa

add_a_photo

Read through to the end for an amazing Toto reference.

335
views

It's now been a week since I stepped foot on the African continent for the first time in my life. I first visited Johannesburg, where my dad and I spent a day on an 'apartheid tour.'

This tour consisted of visiting Shanty Town, one of the poorest communities in South Africa. The living conditions were indeed different. They had to steal electricity through homemade wires connected to the telephone poles. They had only a few porta potties for ten families to share. They had several spickets to obtain fresh water from. There was no heating in the houses, which were made from pieces of painted aluminum.

Such inconvenient circumstances have come from years of oppression towards black people in South Africa. It was incredibly sad to know that these problems still exist and that apartheid only ended so recently.

On the other hand, the people showed very little anger. Despite their living situations, the people of Shanty Town were so kind and welcoming. Everyone we passed smiled and waved, often even saying hello or asking about our wellbeing.

It brought some serious warmth to our hearts to see their sense of community. Everyone was in it together, and no man was left behind. They created jobs and opportunities for one another. They supported each other.

The next part of the day included a tour of Nelson Mandela's old house. We then made a trip to the Apartheid Museum.

Overall, Johannesburg did not disappoint. The city contains a rich history that human beings as a whole can learn a lot from. Johannesburg is a melting pot that still contains a multitude of issues concerning racism and oppression of certain cultures.

After two days in Johannesburg, my family made our way to Madikwe game reserve, where we stayed at Jaci's Lodge.

The safari experience was absolutely incredible. Quite cold (it's winter in Africa right now), but amazing enough to make up for the shivering. We saw all my favorite animals: giraffes galore, elephants, zebras, impalas, lions, hyenas, wildebeests, rhinos, you name it. While my favorite animal will always be the giraffe, I don't think any sighting could beat when two different herds of elephants passed through a watering hole to fuel up on a drink.

Finally on June 1st, I flew to George to start my program with Africa Media in Mossel Bay. On Sunday, we went on an 'elephant walk.'

The safari was certainly cool, but that makes the elephant walk ice cold. We got to walk alongside two male elephants - one was 25, the other 18. They were so cute!! We got to stroke their skin, trunk, and tusks. They had their own little personalities and were so excited to receive treats (fruits and vegetables) at the end of the journey.

My heart couldn't be more full. Africa, you have become my favorite continent. And it sure is going to take a lot to drag me away from you.

Related Content

Facebook Comments