I’m NOT With Her
Start writing a post

I’m NOT With Her

"A dishonest woman shines more in politics than elsewhere."

I’m NOT With Her

Before I even begin writing, I want to clarify that I am not writing this to support Donald Trump. Rather to simply explain my fears and thoughts on what we know to be true about one of our presidential candidates, Mrs. Clinton.

Recently, outsiders have perceived America as a laughing stock. I mean can you blame them? Look at us, and look at this upcoming election. We have a woman who has a federal investigation CURRENTLY happening running for President of the United States. Can anyone tell me how that is okay? Because I don't understand how this is allowed.

I will be petrified for our country if she does become the next President. She has already done so much bad for our country without even being President that it makes me question how much worse she could actually do if she does become elected. For 30 years the Clintons have been lying and cheating their way to the top.

Let's start with the fact that she let four of our American soldiers die in Benghazi, after ignoring their cries for help. There is solid proof of this, yet people just brush this off and take her word. Even after this incident occurred she didn't even show the slightest sign of condolence or sympathy. What she actually did was appear on live television and asked, "What difference does it make?"

Considering she grew up as a privileged white American, attended Yale University, she should know the difference that it makes. It’s pretty self-explanatory. FOUR of our men are dead because of her. Mothers and fathers lost sons and children do not have fathers, yet again because of her. My heart breaks for these families especially mothers like Patricia Smith, who lost her son in Benghazi and stated that Hillary, "Kills people." But I mean come on, "What difference does it make?"

But I guess she really wouldn't know what it's like to have a real family. Considering that one of her own nieces, Macy Smit, reported to the NY Post that she is not voting for her because she is all talk. Macy Smit also stated that she completely is not about family values like she says she is. Considering that she has never even met or helped out Macy's family. She has also stuck by a man who has harassed many women. And she wants to be supported by women? What woman would support someone who stood by her husband after knowing he was assaulting other women and cheating on her with INTERNS? Does the name Monica ring a bell?

She is also so out of touch with the middle class as well, I mean what can I say? She ended her career as secretary of state with hundreds of millions of dollars, thanks to the Clinton Foundation, and the pay for play she engaged in. But that all goes back to how she really doesn’t know what it's like to be an American citizen. Too bad the American workers don't have a few million dollars to "donate" to her fund, right? Because maybe then we could actually get her attention and get her to fight for us.

Did all of her voters also forget that she dumped 33,000 emails into a bleach bit program to become destroyed? What did she have to hide? Well, we have learned a lot about Clinton’s emails through a source called WikiLeaks. We also know how all of her closest staff members feel about Catholics. Because apparently, Catholics are only Catholics because their rich friends won't understand if they became Evangelicals. You would've thought that she would have at least apologized on behalf of her staff right? Well, she didn’t she actually allowed it to happen. So even though this didn’t come directly from her she also didn’t do anything about it.

Even though many things still remain unclear when it comes to the emails, as we all know by now, the FBI has recently re-opened her case to investigate more into her private server. But as Clinton has asked for the FBI to release all the information that they have, I mean that would be a lot easier if she didn't delete everything.

I also LOVE her integrity. Even from when she first started her political career as an investigator on the Watergate scandal. She wanted to bring justice for the people against a president who spied on the democrats. Too bad she didn't get to see the investigation through and was kicked off the team because she was making back-room deals with people. Shocking right?

After all of this proof that she is not who she says she it, it astounds me that people with still stand by her. How do Americans not believe reliable sources? Family members from victims of Benghazi, and even WikiLeaks have shown evidence, but instead, people are just taking her word for all of it. She is fooling all of you and simply doesn't care about anyone but herself.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments