This Is Not A Turning Point For Sexual Misconduct

This Is Not A Turning Point For Sexual Misconduct

Women have been coming forward with stories of their harassment for decades; a few Hollywood stars isn't going to change anything.

Recently, there has been a seemingly unending litany of allegations of sexual misconduct, harassment, and abuse levied against famous people, many of whom were previously admired by large swaths of the population.

Except, by the time this is published, we might not be talking about it anymore. Or, if we still are, we probably won't be in a week or two.

Oh, those men who committed such foul, disgusting acts will still have to live with the socially--though certainly not legally--imposed consequences, as well they should. But the supposed national dialogue about and maybe even national reckoning with sexual misconduct will be over, a relic of the past much like all those conversations about gun control we were supposed to have.

See, many people think of this as a possible Flashpoint in American culture: a moment and series of events that will shape and change how we look at sexual misconduct. But we were also supposed to have one of those after the hearings on now-Supreme-Justice Clarence Thomas' alleged sexual harassment.

But, as we are continually shown, we are far from past the days of men in power using their power and positions of authority to coerce or force themselves upon women in sexually promiscuous and inappropriate, if not violent, ways. And mostly they do this without consequence.

Women have been coming forward with their stories of being sexually abused or harassed by men in their lives for as long as they have had any level of platform to do so. None of this should really surprise us; the fact that it does is more an indictment on how unwilling we have been in the past to believe women when they do come forward.

A 2015 study showed that roughly 71% of women do not report their sexual harassment, likely due to the possible consequences to their own career, implied or direct threats from their harassers, or a belief that they would not be believed or, if they were, that it would not matter. Despite the moving and purposefully disturbing #MeToo campaign, there is nothing to really suggest that these power dynamics will change.

Virtually all of the sexual abusers and harassers in the news lately, with the exception of Roy Moore who is an exceptional case because of the age of his victims, were accused by relatively famous women who also operated in tandem with one another. Most women do not have the platform, relative safety, or voice that fame would provide them nor might they know of other women willing or able to join in their accusations.

I know it must seem that I am taking up a very defeatist tone, but it is hard to be hopeful when we have a serial sexual abuser--who has admitted as much on tape--in the White House.

It is hard to be hopeful when, despite articles like this one from The Atlantic, many liberals still laud and worship Bill Clinton despite his deeply disturbing litany of sexual misconduct--ranging from harassment to abuse to possible rape.

It is hard to remain hopeful when some in Hollywood are calling for these stars accused of such degenerate acts to get second chances which would really be third or fourth or fifth or, you get the idea, chances.

As much as I would like to believe that we have reached a turning point in our discussion about sexual harassment and abuse, I find it very hard to do so.

Cover Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Popular Right Now

I'm An 18-Year-Old Female And I Will Never Be A Feminist

Honestly, I'd rather be caught dead than caught calling myself a modern-day feminist.

"A man told me to have a good day... I'm triggered." How ludicrous does that sound? Tune in because that is the extent of modern day feminism.

Sure, I think boys are stupid and that I'm probably better than 90% of the male population, but that doesn't make me a modern-day feminist. Now I believe that woman should stand up for themselves, and Golding's quote: "I think women are foolish to pretend they are equal to men, they are far superior and always have been," is by far one of my favorite quotes... but modern day feminism is not something I want to be associated with.

I'm all for "anything you can do I can do better," and "We can do it!" but realistically speaking in some situations, that isn't feasible. As an 18-year-old woman who works out regularly, and is stronger than the average female, I couldn't carry a 190-pound man back to a safe zone after he was shot on the front line of a war even if I tried. It is not anatomically possible for a grown woman to be as strong as a fully developed male.

Reality check: Men and women are not equal.

They are not physically equal, they are not mentally equal. Modern-day feminism is equality between the two genders, but corrupt and on steroids. I support what feminism used to be. I support women who work hard and have goals and ambition... not girls who hate men and stomp around with no shirts on to piss off the public. Feminism has developed into a polluted teaching that young men and women are plunging into.

We are built dissimilarly.

The human brain is literally an organ that is sex oriented. There is a cognitive difference, that singlehandedly destroys gender equality.

I will not spend my time running a revolution against anyone who likes Donald Trump. I am not going to binge watch Trump's twitter in an effort to start some leftist gob of drama. I refuse to be part of this head hunt to attack all Republicans on the newest Instagram post made about how feminism is stupid. I do not hate men, and society would crash and burn without the successful men and women who work together to create what we call the United States of America.

Why, you ask? Why are the 15-25 year olds of our society clinging to feminism? They are hopping on the rapidly growing bandwagon where all the hipsters, feminists and Trump haters reside. It's "cool" to hate Donald Trump. Twitter is a world of liberalism, hatred and fake love towards all. Social media is where this generation is living — and modern-day feminism brews there.

We need to keep separation in the household within roles.

We must raise our children to do what they are best at rather than trying to do something they are incapable of just to prove an irrelevant point.

Women must stand up for what they believe in and be strong in their shoes, while not getting so caught up in what your modern day feminist says she thinks is right.

We cannot let this briskly changing society sway us away from what is going to keep the world working precisely.

Cover Image Credit: Macey Joe Mullins

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

To Fix Taxes, We Have To Rethink 'Wealthy'

"Wealthy" doesn't mean the same for everyone.


When discussing taxes today, so many politicians are quick to rush to the adage "tax the rich." Bernie Sanders has called for the rich to be taxed higher to pay for Medicare for All. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has called for a 70% tax on the wealthy.

However, all of these proposals are missing a key thing: a true definition of rich.

When thinking about what counts as rich, it is important to distinguish between the "working wealthy" and the "investment wealthy."

The working wealthy are the people in society that get paid highly because they have a high skill set and provide an extremely valuable service that they deserve just compensation for. This class is made up of professionals like lawyers, doctors, and CEOs. In addition, the working wealthy are characterized by another crucial aspect: over a long term calculation of their earned income over time, they don't come out as prosperous as their annual incomes would seem to suggest. This is because this set of the wealthy has to plunge into student debt for degrees that take years to acquire. These jobs generally also require a huge amount of time invested in lower-paying positions, apprenticeships, and internships before the big-money starts coming in.

On the other hand, the investment wealthy is completely different. These are the people that merely sit back and manipulate money without truly contributing to anything in society. A vast majority of this class is born into money and they use investments into stocks and bonds as well as tax loopholes to generate their money without actually contributing much to society as a whole.

What makes the investment wealthy so different from the working wealthy is their ability to use manipulative techniques to avoid paying taxes. While the working wealthy are rich, they do not have AS many resources or connections to manipulate tax laws the way that the investment wealthy can. The investment wealthy has access to overseas banking accounts to wash money though. The investment wealthy can afford lawyers to comb over tax laws and find loopholes for ridiculous prices. This is tax evasion that the working wealthy simply does not have access to.

That is why it is so incredibly important to make sure that we distinguish between the two when discussing tax policy. When we use blanket statements like "tax the rich," we forget the real reasons that the investment wealthy are able to pay such low taxes now. Imposing a larger marginal tax rate will only give them more incentive to move around taxes while squeezing the working wealthy even more.

Because of this, in our taxation discourse, we need to focus first on making sure people pay their taxes, to begin with. Things like a tax of Wall Street speculation, capital gains taxes, a closing of loopholes, and a simplification of the tax code. These things will have a marked improvement in making sure that the investment wealthy actually pays the taxes we already expect of them now. If we stick to the same message, the only thing we will be changing is the rate that the uber-wealthy are avoiding.

Related Content

Facebook Comments