What Are The Real Attributes To Winning An Argument?

What Are The Real Attributes To Winning An Argument?

Is winning an argument all about the grace in which you approach it?
23
views

Arguments are an inevitable part of life. Through relationships, friendships and professional associations, conflict of ideas drive productivity and create improvement. Merriam Webster dictionary defines an argument as, “an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.” This definition recognizes that opposite views are present and that there is a discussion regarding them, but it doesn’t recognize whether someone wins or loses an argument. Are arguments supposed to be won and if so how does one win an argument?

Let’s break this down. The first thing behind an argument is content. Usually, there needs to be validity behind the content of the argument. Logically, this makes sense. How can someone win an argument without any validity?

In recent trolling of the internet, I’ve read countless articles which persuasively argue a point which really lacks legitimacy. But how do those people and writings stand out and create such a movement behind their views?

After much contemplation, I decided. It’s not necessarily the reasoning behind the belief, it’s the mannerism in which the belief is presented.

A pristine example is the notorious Adolf Hitler. We can assign the blame of mass annihilation of millions and World War II to him. He created such a movement that took thousands of patriotic militants and turned them into killing machines. Hitler’s ideas were definitely not lawful, just or valid. So how did Hitler achieve such high power, such popularity, and so much success? How did he persuade the general public to argue for his beliefs?

Historians believe one of the reasons he reached his achievements was the mannerism in which he presented himself. In historical accounts, Hitler was described as someone with charisma and strength. He spoke with eloquence which demanded respect and attention. It wasn’t what he was saying that was capturing him, it was his self- promotion and image that drew in his supporters.

The content of what Hitler preached was not really the backbone of his power, it was the nature in which he approached the argument that attributed to his success.

So is winning an argument all about the grace in which you approach it?

Personally, I say it is a huge contributor. I still believe every person needs sound points to persevere in conflict. However, people underestimate the art of communication within a conflict. Screaming, acting out, losing control in an argument, even over valid ideas, discredits the argument entirely. The trick is the method of communication. This is a major key to winning any sort of argument.

So, next time you have a disagreement, not only think about the content of the argument but keep in mind the manner in which you approach it.
Cover Image Credit: Childbrand

Popular Right Now

The Trump Presidency Is Over

Say hello to President Mike Pence.

68008
views

Remember this date: August 21, 2018.

This was the day that two of President Donald Trump's most-important associates were convicted on eight counts each, and one directly implicated the president himself.

Paul Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman for a few months in 2016, but the charges brought against him don't necessarily implicate Trump. However, they are incredibly important considering was is one of the most influential people in the Trump campaign and picked Mike Pence to be the vice presidential candidate.

Manafort was convicted on five counts of tax fraud, two counts of bank fraud, and one count of failure to file a report of a foreign bank account. And it could have been even worse. The jury was only unanimous on eight counts while 10 counts were declared a mistrial.

Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer, told a judge that Trump explicitly instructed him to break campaign-finance laws by paying two women not to publicly disclose the affairs they had with Trump. Those two women are believed to be Karen McDougal, a Playboy model, and Stormy Daniels, a pornstar. Trump had an affair with both while married to his current wife, Melania.

And then to no surprise, Fox News pundits spun this in the only way they know how. Sara Carter on Hannity said that the FBI and the Department of Justice are colluding as if it's some sort of deep-state conspiracy. Does someone want to tell her that the FBI is literally a part of the DOJ?

The Republican Party has for too long let Trump get away with criminal behavior, and it's long past time to, at the very least, remove Mr. Trump from office.

And then Trump should face the consequences for the crimes he has committed. Yes, Democrats have a role, too. But Republicans have control of both chambers of Congress, so they head every committee. They have the power to subpoena Trump's tax returns, which they have not. They have the power to subpoena key witnesses in their Russia investigations, which they have not.

For the better part of a year I have been asking myself what is the breaking point with Republicans and Trump. It does not seem like there is one, so for the time being we're stuck with a president who paid off two women he had an affair with in an attempt to influence a United States election.

Imagine for a second that any past president had done even a fraction of what Trump has.

Barack Obama got eviscerated for wearing a tan suit. If he had affairs with multiple women, then Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell would be preparing to burn him at the stake. If they won't, then Trump's enthusiastic would be more than happy to do so.

For too long we've been saying that Trump is heading down a road similar to Nixon, but it's evident now that we're way past that point. Donald Trump now has incriminating evidence against him to prove he's a criminal, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller is just getting started.

Will Trump soften the blow and resign in disgrace before impeachment like Nixon did? Knowing his fragile ego, there's honestly no telling what he'll do. But it's high time Trump leaves an office he never should have entered in the first place.

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Nike's Step Into The Political Realm Gives Us Something to Consider

Nike went political once again with Colin Kaepernick as their main advertisement.

KenzieM
KenzieM
105
views

Nike's new advertisements have brought up a lot of controversy in the past week. Colin Kaepernick, who used to play for the San Francisco 49ers. He is now a free agent after he was let go. He is now the face of Nike. The last few years the NFL (National Football League) has been a platform for Colin Kaepernick used his position to bring awareness to police brutality. He did this by kneeling while they played the national anthem. Many began to follow in his footsteps and kneel as well.

Police brutality is and can be a massive problem. Many do not believe that the people that are meant to protect you actually do. And when the policemen themselves remain virtually unchecked this could actually be a problem.

I know you may want to stop reading this now but listen to my argument.

You can become a police officer when you are 20 years old. It is about as much schooling as you would need to become a CNA or (Certified nursing Aid). However, CNA's are not allowed to handle paperwork, their own patients, or even handing out medicine. Why do you need more schooling to do paperwork, but not to carry a gun? Only some of law enforcement agencies require a two-year degree. Police officers also only have one psych evaluation when they enter into the force. I believe that seeing what police officers see every day can cause extreme stress and mental instability. We must recognize police officers are humans too. They cannot be perfect no matter how much they try. But a system needs to be put in place to help them be the best they can be and weed out the ones that do not need to have that kind of responsibility.

I would also like you to think about this. Nike is a business. Yes, they may have lost a few customers by displaying Colin Kaepernick's face on their new advertisements. But they have gained $43 million dollars in free press. Nike is being talked about everywhere. And products are being bought by people who have supported Colin's movement. So Nike may or may not actually back Kaepernick's protest. I believe they haven't because they are doing nothing with the buzz that they have received. Nike has done this many many times. They advocated for women's rights, even for a man that tested HIV positive and was an incredible marathon runner. They knew this would generate revenue like no other. And because Nike is a sports store, getting involved in politics that included a sports front man. It became like a kid in a candy store. I do love Nike's products. And I am not saying that they are using Kaepernick, but I wish they would put their money into actually helping solve the problem.

I would also like to talk about Colin Kaepernick's protesting. I think it is a good thing when people that have a lot of attention put on them raise awareness for something that is wrong. However, raising awareness only does so much. Recognizing a problem is only the first step. What is the second you ask? Action. If you want to see diversity and change in Law enforcement. Change it. Apply to be a police officer or a lawmaker. You can't just continue to ask someone else to fix the problem. There's a saying that I've followed pretty much all my life. If you want something done, and done right. Do it yourself.

KenzieM
KenzieM

Related Content

Facebook Comments