Building a Type One civilization in 2018

Building a Type One civilization in 2018

The Practicality Of Creating A Type One Civilization In The 21st-Century
562
views

The majority of scientists acknowledge that a Type One civilization (on the Kardashev scale of civilization) is likely to emerge around 2100 at the current course of “civilization progression“. If we reflect on the calculations done in the 1970s such as those conducted by astrophysicist Carl Sagan, we as a global civilization were at a 0.7 on the Kardashev scale as far as energy production required to achieve Type One status. It is therefore the responsibility of people in the year 2018 to recognize that the conscious and deliberate creation of a civilization is essential to achieve the necessary requirements to transcend our current Type Zero status. A key aspect of this is to recognize the impediments to creating a global civilization like a Type One; particularly our current economic system.

Capitalism as a system has suppressed renewable energy sources extensively throughout the late 19th century, the entirety of the 20th century, and continue to do so into the 21st-century; even with major advances in the technological use of renewable energies. The reason for this is that achieving 100% renewable energy is verbatim “free energy”. This is problematic to the entire monetary-market system that capitalism depends on given the potential energy of the human species collectively would surpass in output that which it invested into the technology by a high factor of magnitude. Through this means of energy production, the entire position and premise of private economies built on the grounds of scarcity becomes completely obsolete and incapable of holding any position of legitimacy as a philosophical argument. The implementation of a 100% renewable energy system organized in a global networked manner that draws from every community, would have the necessary requirements to facilitate the final transition of a Type One civilization. The energy production of a global networked energy grid has yet to be recognized in its full potential.

If one considers the energy expended during the world wars and the materials wasted have been statistically calculated to have been capable of producing infrastructure over the entire surface of Mars; one can only imagine the potential capabilities of a fully global mobilized economic system deriving its energy from a unified system. The industrial capabilities of fossil fuel mobilized systems during the world wars were capable of completely shifting economic focus from domestic production to war total mobilization within six months. If this level of coordination is applied to provide every community food, water, energy, infrastructure, knowledge, productive capabilities,etc; than the human species would be capable of legitimately forming a global collective. In which every community is represented on the world stage, and every individual has the means of survival and access to the rest of human civilization to help advance humanity in an ontological continuum.

Humanity stands at a crossroads when it comes to creating a Type One civilization. The logistics and practical means of consciously creating a civilization that functions as a global species wide system is not only possible; but is the only solution to solving the problems and impotence of our current Type Zero stature. The human species has been evolving for hundreds of thousands of years, and we have been cultivating civilization for a fraction of that time. And yet humanity has gone in the span of 10,000 years from learning the basics of agriculture, to exploring the solar system and beyond. In the coming decades, centuries, and millennia, the human race will be accelerating towards crafting civilizations that are not only global, but multi planetary, multi solar, and (possibly in the distant future) multi galactic. The notion of such a massive and complex civilization is not something to be taken lightly nor laughed off as improbable given the statistical reality that civilization complexity is inevitable; if a species does not kill itself off. Therefore it is the responsibility of every human to envision themselves not just now in our current Type Zero existence; but to plan and work towards the greater complexities that Type One, Two, Three etc. level civilizations that we as humans could cultivate as species.

Cover Image Credit: WallDevil

Popular Right Now

This Is How Your Same-Sex Marriage Affects Me As A Catholic Woman

I hear you over there, Bible Bob.
42813
views

It won't.

Wait, what?

SEE ALSO: To My Closeted Self, I Have Something To Tell You

I promise you did read that right. Not what you were expecting me to say, right? Who another person decides to marry will never in any way affect my own marriage whatsoever. (Unless they try to marry the person that I want to, then we might have a few problems.)

As a kid, I was raised, baptized, and confirmed into an old school Irish Catholic church in the middle of a small, midwestern town. Not exactly a place that most people would consider to be very liberal or open minded. Despite this I was taught to love and accept others as a child, to not cast judgment because the only person fit to judge was God. I learned this from my Grandpa, a man whose love of others was only rivaled by his love of sweets and spoiling his grandkids.

While I learned this at an early age, not everyone else in my hometown — or even within my own church — seemed to get the memo. When same-sex marriage was finally legalized country-wide, I cried tears of joy for some of my closest friends who happen to be members of the LGBTQ community. I was happy while others I knew were disgusted and even enraged.

"That's not what it says in the bible! Marriage is between a man and a woman!"

"God made Adam and Eve for a reason! Man shall not lie with another man as he would a woman!"

"Homosexuality is a sin! It's bad enough that they're all going to hell, now we're letting them marry?"

Alright, Bible Bob, we get it, you don't agree with same-sex relationships. Honestly, that's not the issue. One of our civil liberties as United States citizens is the freedom of religion. If you believe your religion doesn't support homosexuality that's OK. What isn't OK is thinking that your religious beliefs should dictate others lives. What isn't OK is using your religion or your beliefs to take away rights from those who chose to live their life differently than you.

Some members of my church are still convinced that their marriage now means less because people are free to marry whoever they want to. Honestly, I wish I was kidding. Tell me again, Brenda how exactly do Steve and Jason's marriage affect yours and Tom's?

It doesn't. Really, it doesn't affect you at all. Unless Tom suddenly starts having an affair with Steve their marriage has zero effect on you. You never know Brenda, you and Jason might become best friends by the end of the divorce. (And in that case, Brenda and Tom both need to go to church considering the bible also teaches against adultery and divorce.)

I'll say it one more time for the people in the back; same-sex marriage does not affect you even if you or your religion does not support it. If you don't agree with same sex marriage then do not marry someone of the same sex. Really, it's a simple concept.

It amazes me that I still actually have to discuss this with some people in 2017. And it amazes me that people use God as a reason to hinder the lives of others. As a proud young Catholic woman, I wholeheartedly support the LGBTQ community with my entire being. My God taught me to not hold hate so close to my heart. He told me not to judge and to accept others with open arms. My God taught me to love and I hope yours teaches you the same.

Disclaimer - This article in no way is meant to be an insult to the bible or religion or the LGBTQ community.

Cover Image Credit: Sushiesque / Flickr

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

We Need To Call the Waffle House Shooting What It Is: White Terrorism

Ignoring the racial and political aspects of recent shootings only treats the symptoms, not the root cause.
43
views

In my Environmental Ethics class, we talked about the idea of a "non-place" - industrialization leading to places that are the same no matter where you go, where you know what to expect each time. You walk in and each is a carbon copy of the last.

The core idea behind making each identical is that no matter where you are, you know what you can expect. Its familiarity is its comfort – you are home, even if it's somewhere you've never been.

But the effect only stands part of the time: as we've seen recently, many public places have been the setting for mass murder.

One of the most recent shootings covered to varying degrees in the news took place at a Waffle House in Nashville. While the shooting has been covered in basic terms, objective reporting removes an integral degree of what this violence means for its victims.

Everyone involved in the Waffle House shooting was in their 20s. Everyone shot was a person of color.

The shooter had a history of supporting Trump and his ideologies, in addition to a record of both racist views and run-ins with the government.

The AR-15 that was used in the shooting was previously taken from him in one of the run-ins, though the government returned the rifle to his father with the promise that he would keep the gun from his son. He gave the gun back to his son sometime between the run-in and the shooting.

The Waffle House shooting exemplifies white privilege and white terrorism in how the shooter has been treated and how people of color, especially black people, are targeted both by civilians and by enforcement.

The shooter's bond, which was later revoked, was widely publicized in contrast with the release of rapper Meek Mill two days later, who was not given bond when he was originally arrested last year for a much lesser charge than murder.

Multiple acts of white terrorism, including the Charleston church shooting, the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting and the Waffle House shooting, were curtailed with the perpetrator arrested and unharmed.

Cops can nonviolently restrain, but only do so when the arrestee is white.

If the person is black, they will be targeted for living. They will be targeted for golfing too slowly. They will be targeted for giving change to the poor. They will be targeted for standing in their own backyard.

Racism and police brutality go long before the past few years, but the increase is unignorably tied to the current administration.

One of the Waffle House shooter's previous government run-ins was because he wanted to meet Trump.

Multiple other recent terrorists, including the Stoneman Douglas shooter, expressed wide support for Trump and his beliefs. The president himself said he could shoot someone and get away with it.

Taurean Sanderlin, Joe Perez, DeEbony Groves and Akilah DaSilva have their names remembered with love because they victims of this tragedy.

The two injured - Shanita Waggonerand Sharita Henderson - are remembered because they survived.

James Shaw Jr., who wrestled the gun away from the shooter, is remembered as a hero, even as he was humble in the aftermath: saying in an interview, “He was going to have to work to kill me.

He is remembered as a hero because he kept more from dying, but in another situation, another non-place, he could've been the men who were arrested in Starbucks.

It doesn't even have to be a non-place.

He could be any number of names from any number of places that have been carved into remembrance for fear of forgetting what #BlackLivesMatter stands for.

Multiple articles following the Waffle House shooting have said that the main detail unknown about the event is the shooter's motives. I don't think that's something we'll ever explicitly find out, but it doesn't take a detective to see the trail.

Cover Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Related Content

Facebook Comments