Why I No Longer Watch The Vlogbrothers

Why I No Longer Watch The Vlogbrothers

Calling for my people’s death is never a joke.
3312
views

I nearly wrote about this at the time. But I deleted the draft. I was afraid. The internet is not always a kind place to be.

Don’t get me wrong; the internet can be a great place. I used to be a very lonely person. I assumed that the ratio of nerds to non-nerds in my area was representative of the world – meaning that outside my family I would rarely, if ever, find someone who was as unashamedly enthusiastic about knowing things and liking things as I was.

And then my big sister, who had recently gone off to college, started sending me Facebook messages about something called Vlogbrothers. I held out for a while, more interested in reading books than watching YouTube videos. But she persisted. Eventually, one Thanksgiving, she cornered me with her laptop, saying, “John Green has a puppy named Willy, and his brother Hank wrote a song for Willy, and the video is really cute. Want to watch it?” And I did. And not long after that, I found myself sitting at my parents’ desktop, binge-watching the entire Vlogbrothers archive. I remember smiling a lot, and laughing a lot, and thinking about how awesome it was that hundreds of thousands of people were subscribed to this channel. Hundreds of thousands of people enjoyed listening to the Green brothers talk about and be enthusiastic about things. Hundreds of thousands of people were unashamedly enthusiastic about knowing things and liking things. Hundreds of thousands of people heard the phrase “we should decrease world suck” and thought “yes, we should!” Hundreds of thousands of people were nerds like me. I spent years happily referring to myself as a “Nerdfighter” and identifying with that community.

PewDiePie is a YouTuber who has fifty-four million subscribers, more than any other YouTube Channel. He makes millions of dollars a year in ad revenue, and he had a deal making a show for Maker Studios, a division of Disney. This January, he posted a video in which he paid people to hold up a sign that read “Death to all Jews.”

I didn’t see the video when it was first posted. But in early February, Maker Studios dropped his deal and cited the video as the reason – and suddenly it seemed everyone on the internet was talking about the incident and sharing the video around. They also started sharing around other videos PewDiePie had made in which he donned Nazi uniforms and said that Hitler did nothing wrong. I watched them. I don’t want to go too deeply into how they made me feel. Suffice to say that they scared me.

But what was worse was the backlash. The creators of other popular YouTube channels started speaking up, in tweets and in videos. They said that it wasn’t fair how PewDiePie had been treated. Among these YouTubers were the Vlogbrothers. Those nerds I looked up to. In a series of tweets that he has since deleted (but not retracted), Hank Green said that we should not “attack” PewDiePie, that calling him antisemitic was “a rhetorical leap at best,” that sure he was “unpleasant” but it was “just a joke” and we should focus on people who “perpetrate actual hate.”

Those tweets made me feel even worse than the videos. This was someone I looked up to, one of the nerds who let me know that I was not really that alone in the world – and he thought that calling for the death of my people was not “actual hate”? He thought that our fear and anger was unjustified?

I told my parents about it. They know how much the Vlogbrothers meant to me and my sister; we’d often shared the Green brothers’ educational and social justice centered videos with them. My parents suggested that I contact Hank directly about it, since he has such a focus in his videos about making the world a better place, and the Vlogbrothers often take feedback from their community. So I sent Hank and John an email explaining how antisemitic words and actions are antisemitic regardless of the context, that “Death to all Jews” is never a joke, and how this entire thing made me feel. Neither of them replied.

My sister chose a different avenue to take action. The Vlogbrothers often say that they are proud of how polite and supportive the comment sections on their videos are. So my sister made a comment on one of their videos asking for them to “please clarify Hank’s stance on antisemitism” because “what he said had made her feel unsafe.”

Within minutes, other Nerdfighters began to reply to her comment, attacking her. They denied the whole thing: “he didn’t say anything hateful.” They asked her if she knew what a joke was. They threw out curse words I won’t repeat here. One used “Jew” as an insult. One said she must have a “serious neurosis” because “no one really believes that all Jews should die.” One accused her of being a “troll” because “there’s no way you really feel unsafe because of what he said.”

Like I said, the internet is not always a kind place to be. But we had thought that this was one of the kinder places.

After a few days, my sister deleted the comment, and we both unsubscribed from the Vlogbrothers and most of the other channels they are connected to. YouTube keeps recommending that I watch their videos. Not long after the comment section fiasco, Hank posted a video titled “I Disagree With Me,” which I clicked on in a moment of hope, but it turned out to be about the environment.

I am an optimist. I like to think that if you explain to people how what they said or did hurt you, they will realize their wrongdoing and correct themselves. Sometimes they don’t.

Nerdfighteria is supposed to be about learning things and using that knowledge to make the world a better place. And in some ways, it does do that. The yearly Project for Awesome draws attention and hundreds of thousands of dollars to a wide range of nonprofits. The Green brothers have used their platform to create and promote educational YouTube channels – Crash Course, SciShow, Healthcare Triage, Sexplanations, The Art Assignment, and so many more. They tell people that it’s okay to be nerdy. They make fun, clever content that formed the basis of many of my dearest friendships, both online and in-person. Those are all good things.

I am glad to know that there are hundreds of thousands of nerds in the world. But I am also glad that I have nerdy real-life friends now, and so I no longer need Nerdfighteria, because I no longer feel safe there. I no longer trust or respect the Vlogbrothers.

Last December, I shared my story with The Road to Nerdfighteria, a group collecting stories about how the Vlogbrothers and the community they created has shaped our lives. Just after I unsubscribed from the Vlogbrothers channel, a member of that group contacted me asking for my permission to use my story in an upcoming podcast project. I said that they could if they included an addendum, explaining the reasons why I no longer feel safe in Nerdfighteria, and that while I hope that Hank and John will continue to inspire and give hope to other people the way they inspired and gave hope to me, Nerdfighteria is no longer my home.

They have promised to include the addendum. They told me they do not want their project to “whitewash” Nerdfighteria, and that Nerdfighters should know that they still have things to work on.

Over the past few months, I have been scared much more often than I’d like to be. But The Road to Nerdfighteria’s promise to me gives me hope for that community.

Cover Image Credit: Sophie Katz

Popular Right Now

Islam Is Not A Religion Of Peace, But Neither Is Christianity

Let's have in honest converation about the relgious doctrine of Islam

53477
views

Islam is not a religion of peace.

Christianity is also not a religion of peace.

But, most people in both religions are generally peaceful.

More specifically, bringing up the doctrine of Christianity is a terrible rebuttal to justify the doctrine of Islam.

That is like saying, "Fascism is not a good political ideology. Well, Communism isn't any good either. So, Fascism is not that bad after all."

One evil does not justify another evil. Christianity's sins do not justify Islam's.

The reason why this article is focused on Islam and not Christianity is the modern prevalence of religious violence in the Islamic world. Christianity is not without its evil but there is far less international terrorist attacks and mass killing perpetrated by Christians today than by those of Islam.

First, let's define "religious killings," which is much more specific than a practicer of a religion committing a murder.

A religious killings are directly correlated with the doctrines of the faith. That is different a human acting on some type of natural impulse killing someone.

For example, an Islamic father honor killing his daughter who was raped is a religious killing. But an Islamic man who catches his wife cheating and kills her on the spot is a murder, not a religious killing. The second man may be Islamic but the doctrine of Islam cannot be rationally held at fault for that killing. Many men with many different religions or experience would make the same heinous mistake of taking a life.

Second, criticizing a doctrine or a religion is not a criticism of everyone that practices the religion.

It is not even a criticism of everyone who make mistake while inspired by the religions. Human are willing to do heinous things when governed by a bad cause. Not every World War 2 Nazis was a homicidal maniac but human nature tells them to act this way in order to survive in their environment. It is hard to fault a person from traits that comes from evolutionary biology and natural selection.

However, commenting on a philosophy, ideology or a religion is not off limits. Every doctrine that inspires human action should be open for review. The religion may be part of a person's identity and it holds a special place in its heart but that does not mean it should be immune to criticism.

Finally, before going into a deconstruction of the myth that Islam is a religion of peace, there needs to be a note about the silencing of talking about Islam.

There is a notion in Western Society that if a person criticizes Islam, then that person hates all Muslims and the person suffers from Islamophobia. That is not the case, a person to criticize religion without becoming Donald Trump. In Western Society criticizing fundamental Christians is never seen as an attack on all Christians because there is a lot of bad ideas in the Bible that Christians act on. Therefore, criticizing Islam should have the same benefit of the doubt because the Quran has many bad ideas in it.

The Quran advocates for war on unbelievers a multitude of times. No these verses are not a misreading or bad interpretation the text. Here are two explicit verses from the Quran that directly tell Followers to engage in violence:

Quran 2: 191-193:

"And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah (disbelief or unrest) is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists and wrong-doers)"

Quran 2: 216:

"Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."

There is no rational way to interrupt these passages in a peaceful way. The whole premise of both passages is to inspire followers that war against the unbeliever is justified.

The first verse advocates for genocide against non-believers for the mere transgression that a society worships a different god or worships another god along with Allah.

The second passage is arguable more dangerous because the first passage just advocate that fighting may be a necessity, while the second passage encourages it. The second passage claims that war on the unbeliever is a good thing under the eyes of Allah.

The reason why these passages are dangerous is because they directly incite religious violence. For most followers of Allah, these passages are ignored or they convince themselves the passages means something they do not. However, for a large numbers of followers that view the text of the Quran as the unedited words of Allah, these texts become extremely dangerous. These passages become all the rational they need to wage war on non-believers.

This is dangerous because there are millions of followers of Islam worldwide that believe every statement in the Quran is true.

Therefore, the Quran becomes a direct motivation and cause for its followers to attack non-followers. Rationally one can understand where the Islam follower comes from, if a person truly believes that Allah or God himself wrote these words then why would you not comply.

Especially when there is verses in the Quran that says the Follower who does not fight the infidel is not as worthy of a Follower that does wage war against the non-believer (Quran 4:95). Finally, when male Followers are told that their martyrdom fighting for the faith will be rewarded with an eternity in paradise with 72 virgins for personal pleasure. If a Follower truly believes all of this is the spoken word of Allah then there is more rational why a person would commit these atrocities then why they would not.

Men and women are radicalized by these passages on a daily basis.

No, it is not just the poor kid in Iraq that lost his family to an American bombing run that indiscriminately kills civilians but also the middle classed Saudi Arabian child or some Western white kid that finds the Quran appealing. If radicalization were just poor people, then society would not have much to be worried about. However, Heads of States, college educated people and wealthy Islamic Followers are all being radicalized and the common dominator is the doctrine of Islam.

Osama Bin Laden, one of the most infamous terrorist in history, was not a poor lad that was screwed by the United States military industrial complex. Bin Laden was the son of a billionaire, that received an education through college from great schools. There is no other just cause for Bin Laden to orchestrate such grievous attacks on humanity besides religious inspirations. A person can rationally tie Islam Followers gravitation towards terrorism to a specific verse. Quran 3: 51 tells readers,

"Soon shall we cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers."

Any rational person can tie Islamic passages like this directly to terrorism. It is not a complicated correlation to like Nazism and Jewish persecution to Christianity. The Holy Book of Islam directly encourages the Followers of Islam to inflict terrorism unto the non-believer.

So why do some many people deny these obvious truths about Islam and violence?

Political Correctness and the want to not be viewed as a bigot. The correlations here are as direct as the terrors of the Spanish Inquisitions and Catholicism and no one is afraid to retrospect and say, "Yes Christianity caused the direct murder of thousands of people". A person would not even be controversial if one stated that both World Wars has significant religious undertones. However if anyone states that terrorism and violence has a direct link with Islam then there is an outcry.

Even President Obama refused to use the terms Islam and Muslim when publicly talking about the War on Terrorism. I am a hypocrite also because I used the term Islamic Follower instead of Muslim in an attempt to sound more political correct.

That is a problem when society refuse to use terms that are correct in an attempt to not offend anyone. Imagine if scientist could not report their findings because the underlying politics. Society needs to be able to have open dialogue about this problem or else it will never heal. Society needs to throw away the worrisome about being politically correct and focus on identifying the problems and solving them.

The world of Islam needs to open themselves up to this criticism.

There can no longer be a closing of dialogue where the West cannot speak on the doctrines of Islam because they are not partakers (That applies to all organized religion too, especially the Catholic Church). People who draw Muhammed must no longer be threatened with attacks on their life.

When Islamic women and men speak up about the sins of Islam, they must stop being silenced. If humanity is going to take steps into the future with better technology and more dangerous weaponry, then we need to solve this problem with Islam and gradually to organized religion at all.

If not it will doom us way before we get there…

Thank you for reading and if you enjoyed this article follow my podcast on Twitter @MccrayMassMedia for more likewise discussions.

Cover Image Credit:

https://unsplash.com/photos/JFirQekVo3U

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

5 Reasons Beto O'Rourke Has My Vote In November

And 5 reasons why he should have yours, too.

125
views

In the midterm elections coming up this November, incumbent Texas Senator Ted Cruz is being challenged by El Paso native Beto O'Rourke. O'Rourke is what political scientists call a "quality challenger" against Cruz, because he has held public office before. He has served in the US House of Representatives for the 16th district of Texas since 2012. O'Rourke is modern, passionate, innovative and intelligent. I would be proud to have him representing my fellow Texans and me in the Upper House of Congress. Here are just a few of the reasons why he will have my vote this November.

1. He truly cares about Texas constituents.

Beto has spent the past several months driving across the state and visiting every single county in Texas (note: there are 254 of them). He has spoken at town halls, universities, and anywhere else he can have his voice heard. This shows that he is willing to make a genuine effort to connect with the people of Texas, to hear their concerns on the issues of today, and to answer any questions they may have about his plans as a Senator. He is not an unreachable politician who acts in his own self interest, but is instead a down to earth and humble fellow citizen.

2. He is running a grassroots campaign.

Beto's campaign funding comes solely from grassroots donations of the people who support him. He does not accept any money from PACs (political action committees), which is rare in political campaigns these days. There is nothing disingenuous about this man - every dollar of his funding came directly from those who believe in his ideas and support his candidacy.

3. He understands the value of having various cultures in the US.

O'Rourke was born and raised in El Paso, Texas, a border city that is part of the largest bi-national community in the Western Hemisphere. It is right across the border from Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico. Although O'Rourke is not a native Spanish speaker, he has learned the language and now speaks it fluently. On his Twitter account, Beto has expressed appreciation multiple times for the bi-cultural community in which he grew up.

4. He will fight for universal healthcare.

O'Rourke believes that healthcare is a right, not a privilege. If elected, he would like to call for expansion of Medicaid to ensure care for children, the elderly, and the disabled. O'Rourke's campaign has also mentioned creating a public option within the healthcare exchange that will guarantee affordable coverage, and also plans to make incentives for insurance companies to participate in the exchanges. To read more about Beto O'Rourke's stance on healthcare, click here.

5. He has ideas for immigration reform.

A few of these ideas include passing the DREAM Act, introducing a more efficient path to citizenship for immigrants, and ensuring that those who are prosecuted for entering the US illegally are given the chance to defend their claims under due process of law. The DREAM Act will allow for undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children and went to school here to obtain legal status. A more efficient path to citizenship will allow immigrants the opportunity to come here legally without having to wait several years for that chance. For a full look at Beto's stance on immigration, click here.

If any of this serves your interests or sparks your curiosity, visit Beto O'Rourke's website at https://betofortexas.com to learn more.

Cover Image Credit:

Photo by Human Rights Campaign

Related Content

Facebook Comments