There are two types of girls in the world, girls with
finstas (fake Instagram) and girls without. I happen to be part of the group of
girls who do have finsta and I would never go back. I have my real Instagram and
believe me I love posting nice pictures of me and my friends, the occasional
selfie, and the rare artsy food picture (not typically my Instagram style, but
occasionally.) But then there’s the world of finsta. Let me define Instagram’s
for you in 3 words. Reckless, savage, scary. Just too put it into prospective
if anybody who I did not approve to see my finsta saw it, I would be mortified,
a little embarrassed and then shunned from society (only slightly kidding about
this one.) The world of finsta gives girls away to express themselves freely to
about 50 of their closes friends. If you were to given permission to visit that
typical girls finsta the pictures you would see could vary from the ugliest
selfies, to embarrassing pictures of their friends, too reckless picture of
them or their friends and the chosen boy from the night before, too screenshots
of text messages that are too scary to even put into words.
The morning after a great or even bad night out you will see
Instagram feeds full of finstas stating things you couldn’t imagine in your
wildest dreams, the most savage comments and ever dreaded drunk picture of yourself
you didn’t know your friend took. When you are posting a finstagram everything is
fair game. Finstagram lives by the saying “If you can’t take the heat, get out of
the kitchen” but finsta would say that in a lot more savage terms. Most girls
who have finsta post on their finstagrams more then there real instagrams. When
posting on real Instagram you need to make sure your picture is perfectly
edited, your hair looks great, your make up on point but at the same time look
like you didn’t even try to take that picture even though you have 350 others
in your camera roll that look exactly like that one. Posting a finstagram is a
whole different game, posting a finsta you look for the most reckless, crazy,
hilarious, ugliest, best type of black mail picture there is. Along with the picture
you need a hilarious caption to go along with it that all your friends will
love. There are only a few rules of finstagram, be reckless, don’t get offended
and learn to laugh at yourself. Life isn’t always serious and I think
finstagrams give girls a chance to step out of the “perfect” life they portray
on Instagram and show a whole different side of themselves on their finstagrams
without a care in the world. A girl finstagram is like a door to her true self,
if a girl lets you follow her finstagram, you truly are blessed. Girls of the
world, keep strutting your stuff a finstagram. To the girls who don’t have one,
it will change your life forever.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Student Life![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
