The Truths From Leonardo DiCaprio's "Before The Flood"
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

The Truths From Leonardo DiCaprio's "Before The Flood"

Climate change is real and urgent, and DiCaprio teams up with National Geographic to share the truths.

The Truths From Leonardo DiCaprio's "Before The Flood"

On October 21st, National Geographic released "Before the Flood," a special on climate change starring Leonardo DiCaprio. This week, the 1 hour and 36 minute special circulated the internet, as it was free to watch for a short period of time. DiCaprio spent two years traveling the globe, experiencing climate changes from the air pollution in China, the ravaged rain forests of Indonesia, to the flooding of our own home country of America.

DiCaprio became interested in climate change at a very young age, from which he says his first memory was of a painting, called The Garden of Earthly Delights- that hung above his crib. It is a three panel painting by the Renaissance artist Bosch. The first panel depicts an image of the creation and harmony of the world, the second panel, named "Before the Flood," is an image of the Earth ravaged by sin and humankind's desire to take life into their own hand. The third panel hauntingly depicts the consequences of the second panel.

"Before the Flood" was an informative and moving documentary. Leonardo DiCaprio discovers that the more he learns about climate change on his journey, the more he realizes he actually does not know. He learns so many things that he was ignorant to be fore, and through the special, we feel the same way.

We all know the basics of climate change-the Earth's temperature is rising, the ice is melting, the sea levels are rising, and we are burning forests and using too many fossil fuels. The Ocean-full of coral reefs-and rain forests act as Carbon buffers for us, but we are destroying them and leaving ourselves vulnerable. "Before the Flood" educates us beyond these commonly known facts, and extrapolates on what will happen because of all of this-and what we can try to do to help.

The ice is melting-that we know for a fact. But do we know just how badly and quickly this is occurring? In the film, we learn that by 2040, we will be able to sail through the North Pole, because there will be no ice left to stop us from doing so. The land of Greenland has melted thirty feet in just the last five years. Thirty feet is about five twin mattresses stacked on top of each other, the tall way.

When DiCaprio was shooting scenes in Northern Canada for his recent movie The Revenant, there was no snow. Snow had to be shipped in to the set so that the scenes could have the necessary climate. It is not just the North Pole and Greenland that is suffering this kind of melting-it is our own continent.

(Photo from a scene of "Before the Flood," as DiCaprio explores the melting ice.)

All of this melting causes the sea level to rise-that we know as a fact, too. DiCaprio visited small islands will soon be swallowed up by the sea, no longer existing. And this is occurring in our home country as well. Florida is greatly susceptible to flooding and rising sea levels, so much so that it would be the first state to disappear. Florida even often has an occurrence called "Sunny Day Flooding," where the weather is warm and there is not a cloud in the sky, but rising water levels cause the streets to flood through sewers and drains.

(An example of "Sunny Day Flooding" in Miami, FL.)

While this has been an apparent issue over the last few decades, and increasingly so in the last couple of years, why have we yet to do anything about it? What can we even do about it? These are common questions, questions that Leonardo DiCaprio himself asked in the film.

The problems he found originate from the misconceptions we have about climate change. Many people do not believe in it because that is what we are taught. Big companies that greatly add to our climate disaster-companies like Exxon, Shell, and BP-send out messages that climate change does not exist. They want the public to deny this issue so that they can still have business. These, and other big companies-like Kraft, who is adding to the deforestation rapidly so that they may obtain palm olive for their products-organize anti-climate change movements so that they may simply stay in business.

Another detriment to helping stop climate change is the politicians in office. Many officials-like Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and Donald Trump-do not believe in climate change. If they, and other governmental officials do not believe in climate change, then the necessary laws for climate change will never be passed.

DiCaprio insists, in that aspect, that it is greatly up to us to change the politicians' minds. Once we, as a mass, demand a change, the politicians will soon be on board. The film used the example that when Barack Obama was originally campaigning, he was publicly against gay marriage. However, people banded together for the cause, and it was President Obama who then signed the gay marriage law into effect. Once we band together for the cause, the politicians will be on board, as well.

(In the film, Leonardo DiCaprio talks with President Obama regarding climate change.)

DiCaprio also visits the idea of a "Carbon Tax" multiple in the film as an answer to the climate change issue. A "Carbon Tax" would simply tax anything that emits carbon into the air. While raising taxes might seem like a bad idea at first, ultimately it could. Putting a "Carbon Tax" into effect would lead people to choose more renewable options. This type of tax has actually been done before, with positive outcomes. In the past, there has been a higher tax placed on cigarettes, which has ultimately lead to less cigarette consumption!

Another big question stands-what about solar and wind power? And that is a very real question, a question that DiCaprio also asks.

A shocking fact was shared in the film: the sun produces 1,000 times the energy we need for power in one day than we use in one year. So why hasn't America gotten on board with solar and wind power yet? There is no good answer to this question-we just do not have the will.

Solar and wind power have proven positive in other countries. Germany relies mainly on solar power, instead of fossil fuels. Denmark relies nearly on 100% wind power. Sweden has recently had an uprising from the citizens, as they have been concerned about their country's carbon use. Because of that, the government has promised to begin using other power sources-relating back to the fact that the people have the power to persuade the government in this issue!

Once solar and wind power structures are built, we basically have free power for a lifetime. Yet, sadly, America has yet to figure this out!

(An image of Denmark's solar power structures.)

All these governmental changes may seem difficult, and they can take a long time. Leonardo DiCaprio acknowledged that in the film, and searched for answers for something we can do about climate change ourselves right now. He learned, and shared with us in the film, that simply changing our diet can greatly help climate change. For example, beef and cows are more harmful to our climate than we realize. The United States alone dedicates a large amount of the country's land to cattle farming. The truth is, cattle release harmful methane into the air as they eat and burp. Silly as it may seem, it is true. We do not need to become vegetarians and completely cut out beef from our diets, but cutting out beef 50, to even 25%, or switching to chicken, actually will greatly decrease the amount of methane released into the air.

Together, as a team of countries around the world, we have recently taken a huge step in the right direction. In 2015, a large number of countries met together to pass the Paris Agreement-an agreement that brings all nations together to begin to do as much as possible to help combat climate change. They even talked about the "Carbon Tax."

If these countries will actually follow through with the Agreement, we can not be sure. However, it is a monumental start. In the film, President Obama acknowledged that it is the architecture of the solution for the problem. And Pope Francis acknowledged it as well, agreeing that it is step in the right direction.

(DiCaprio meets with Pope Francis, discussing the Paris Agreement.)

At the conclusion of the film, the scary questions remain: are we doing enough? What will the future hold for Earth? Is it too late?

DiCaprio reflects on this issue. He looks out into the city, realizing that we need to change each tiny light, change each car there is. And when you zoom out of the picture, you will see all the endless amount of lights and cars on Earth that need to be rebuilt and changed to be un-harmful. It is overwhelming.

The message needs to be overwhelming. We need to understand the fact that climate change is a real and urgent issue. President Obama reflects that he does not want his children and his grandchildren growing up in a world without beautiful glaciers and animals. Pope Francis urges that we need to band together to save our "common home." And Leonardo DiCaprio reminds us that it would be shameful of us to have the means, but not the will, to help stop climate change.

All information in the article was obtained from the film "Before the Flood." Watch the trailer on the National Geographic Channel, here.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments