For most of us, our summer vacations were fairly typical. School is out, so we relaxed a little, worked a lot, and loved every minute of it. If we had to answer that typical question of how we spent our summer vacation, I can't think of most accomplishments that could top what the chamber choir did.
This grand break held a grand adventure for Clarion's choir. They went on a European experience like no other. They traveled to Wales to perform at an international competition. If that wasn't cool enough to go on a trip where people got to sing and enjoy some of the many wonderful sites that is offered, they managed to take third. That's right, they were the third best group in the world in that contest. Not just regional or state, the entire world.
I originally meant to make an article about them before they went on their trip because they needed donations. Unfortunately, that didn't happen because my summer has been incredibly busy with work. I'm lucky to remember if it is Friday night and have my articles in on time. On that note, I apologize to them. I am writing this article to point out just how wonderful it is that they were successful overseas.
With the school deciding to phase out their music program, it is nice to see that Clarion students are incredibly talented. In fact, their choir director was someone who was a math professor at the university. He just so happened to also have a minor in music, as well.
Since I know a few of the choir members, this is exciting news. Friends, even a fraternity brother, went to Wales and ended up placing at an international event. Classmates of mine went on a musical adventure that they will never forget. It is moments like this that make me proud to be a member of Clarion University. When Clarion succeeds, I get the biggest grin on my face. A small town college like Clarion making a big splash on an international level? That's as awesome as when one of our athletes goes on to win gold in the Olympics, play in a Super Bowl, and coach one of the most dominate programs in NCAA basketball, but this accomplishment is a little more special in my opinion. Athletics are cool, but music is refreshing. It is almost as refreshing as intellectual accomplishments. After all, Clarion is well-rounded, shouldn't their accomplishments be?
Congratulations to the Chamber Choir. What you have achieved is what makes me proud to be a golden eagle. Keep on flying my musical friends!
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Entertainment![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
