The Disadvantages Of Strict Parenting

The Disadvantages Of Strict Parenting

Strict parenting isn't just embarassing for teens, its effects are actually harmful.

There are many different styles of raising children, all of which have differing effects on how they develop psychologically. It is important to be an authoritative parent, enforcing rules and expectations so that the child grows up with a learned sense of morality. However, parents who take their authority to an extreme level, expecting unquestioned obedience from their child, are known as authoritarian parents. This parenting style has negative effects of the social and cognitive development of children.

Authoritarian parenting is often characterized by strict rules and harsh punishments. These parents often shame their children and display a withdrawal of love and affection, as a form of punishment. The harsh, cold environment of fearful compliance that exists within authoritarian households, has many disadvantages on the development of children and adolescents.

Children raised by strict, authoritarian parents are more likely to have little self esteem and self-management when they reach adulthood. This is because blind obedience does not leave room for that child to learn how to self-regulate. They are more likely become depressed and show signs of anger outside the home. Also, for kids raised this way, juvenile delinquency is a common way of exercising their independence. Authoritarian parenting often teaches the child to only do what is right when a figure of authority is around, and it also teaches them to become excellent liars.

Balancing authority and enforcement, with warmth and affection is a style that has shown to be most beneficial to a child’s development. Parents who set high expectations for their children but are also understanding and willing to compromise, tend to have closer relationships not only during childhood , but throughout life. An open, relaxed, home-environment fosters strong relationships between parents and children. Growing up with the notion that it is okay to make mistakes is healthy for a developing adolescent and high self-esteem, self-discipline, and respect are characteristics seen in children raised in this way.

The level of strictness that parents enforce on their children plays an important role on development and can have lifelong effects . Being too permissive allows children to believe that they can do whatever they want without any consequence, but being too strict is also extremely harmful to a child. Therefore, a balanced combination of affection and authority within a relaxed home environment doesn’t only benefit cognitive and social development but it also breeds the strong, lifelong, relationships between parents and their children.

Cover Image Credit:

Popular Right Now

Sessions' War On Pot Is A War The GOP Will Lose

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is fighting a losing battle.

Jeff Sessions and the Trump administration continue their war on the GOP's future; this time attacking marijuana, just as Trump's Attorney General Jeff Sessions promised he would from the start.

The former Senator from Alabama revoked an Obama rule that left states with legalized recreational marijuana alone, allowing the states to operate the way they are meant to. Obama's rule was actually a big win for states' rights, as it prevented the federal government from interfering with legal marijuana industries in the United States.

Despite candidate Trump agreeing that the legalization of marijuana should be left up to the states, his appointment for Attorney General has never agreed and constantly appears afraid of marijuana.

While marijuana is not harmless, policing it the way Sessions wants to is inefficient, wasteful, and at the end of the day, unconstitutional.

Sessions has yet to call for any outrageous directions against the legal products, but removing the protections is one step in the completely wrong direction for him, the Trump administration, and the Republican party.

The constitutionality of the federal government attacking states with legal marijuana is not really up for debate. If Sessions decides to crack down on legal marijuana, it will be the wrong and unconstitutional decision.

More than that though, this revamped possible war on pot is not a battle Republicans need to be fighting.

Marijuana is something that should be legal in the country, and it inevitably will be - so long as the federal government ends its war on its legalization.

Colorado was the first state to legalize marijuana in the United States, and the tax revenue from the legal product has not stopped increasing.

Even more than tax revenue, there are numerous positive benefits to legalizing marijuana recreationally. A plant that can be grown on a window sill would allow people to use it medicinally. It would allow people to self-medicate if need-be.

Veterans are a big proponent of it. Realistically, marijuana can help our nation's veterans, and legalizing it recreationally would allow the most disciplined people in our country to self-medicate; avoiding the mess that is the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

The pros definitely outweigh the cons in terms of legalized marijuana. However, this is not the only reason that top Republicans should, at the very least, leave this topic up to the states.

The current Republican party does not exactly have a great image under Trump, and openly attacking marijuana while contradicting the Constitution is quite possibly the worst idea this administration could have, specifically for its future.

A survey taken in 2015 stated that 60% of polled young Republicans favor legalized marijuana. On top of that, millennials in general support marijuana legalization, and becoming bipartisan on this issue can paint a better picture for the Republican party.

The GOP is going backward if it actually decides to impede the progress that legal marijuana is making across the country. While alcohol and cigarettes remain legal, Sessions paints a party that wants to attack something that could positively impact society.

Young voters were not kind to Trump in this last presidential election and were a big reason for Doug Jones' upset of Roy Moore in the Alabama special election.

The GOP can appeal to its future by simply leaving pot alone. That is all they have to do to win on this subject. Leave it up to the states, and you are not pushing young conservatives away, but rather embracing the reality of widespread support for marijuana.

The battle against marijuana is one that Republicans will inevitably lose, but the loss could be worse if they try to go down with a fight. Federally intervening against an inevitable positive change in the United States is dead last on the list of things the GOP needs.

Leaving marijuana legalization up to the states is not only the right thing but also the smart thing for Republicans to do.

Cover Image Credit: Flickr Creative Commons

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

President Trump Ends Protection Status For Salvadoran Immigrants

Nearly 200,000 legal Salvadoran immigrants could face deportation after living in the U.S. for over a decade

President Trump has made a decision that could send around 200,000 Salvadorans living in the U.S back to El Salvador by 2019. The Salvadoran immigrants were granted temporary protected status permits back in 2001 after El Salvador was hit with deadly earthquakes. Those permits have been renewed on an 18-month basis since then.

Why does this matter?

This is another push by the administration to push out foreigners living in the U.S. and slowing down the flow of legal and illegal immigration. Since Trump became president, arrests by immigration have increased by 40% and fewer refugees are being accepted by the United States since the 1980s.

The Department of Homeland Security says their decision to revoke residency status to Salvadoran immigrants makes sense since conditions in El Salvador have improved since 2001. DHS gave immigrants a deadline of September 9th, 2019 to arrange their departure or seek permanent residency in the U.S.

Advocates have asked the department to give immigrants more time to seek permanent residency due to El Salvador’s increased violence and high homicide rate. There is also the question of money, immigrants will have to seek the help of an attorney to help them file for legal residency. Lawyer fees could be thousands of dollars depending on each case. Permit holders have been living in the U.S. for over a decade, they have U.S. born children, stable jobs, and possibly businesses.

Families will now have to decide whether they want to take their American-born children back to El Salvador, or stay in the U.S. and face arrest or deportation. Without the work permit, people will lose their jobs, leaving them without health insurance and other benefits.

How will this affect businesses and companies?

Many Salvadoran immigrants are also homeowners and make up the majority workforces in some cities like Houston, Texas. They work in the service industry, at places like Reagan National Airport, the World Bank, and many other major landmarks. Officials are calling the decision “shameful”, they also say more than 160,000 thousand workers are employed in the service industry nationwide and that losing them would be detrimental.

According to the Center for Migration Studies, permit recipients have more than 190,000 children who are U.S. citizens and nearly 90% of them are actively working. Some construction companies who are relying on these workers to repair the damage from Hurricane Harvey in Texas could lose up to 30 workers.

Is El Salvador ready to take back its citizens?

One of the main reasons why this decision was passed by the Department of Homeland Security was due to the developments and the reconstruction in El Salvador after the earthquakes. The country has come along way in terms of rebuilding schools, hospitals and roads, however, in recent years the country has been considered the most dangerous places on earth. In 2016, its economy experienced the slowest growth than any other country in Central America.

The Salvadoran government, including its president Salvador Sanchez Ceren, has pleaded with the Trump administration to allow its citizens to remain in the U.S. citing a drought and other factors. Moving hundreds of thousands of people back to El Salvador could also have a serious effect on the country's economy. Families living in the country also depend on family members living in the U.S. to send them money. More than $4 Billion per year is sent back to El Salvador, ranking as its single greatest source of income.

Advocates and other groups are now working to use the 18-month grace period to petition the government to come up with a permanent solution.

Cover Image Credit: Joint Task Force-Bravo

Related Content

Facebook Comments