We have all heard it before "I am busy", "too busy doing work", "not enough time I have work to do." The time we spend is mostly sucked up by so many different aspects of work. You can't escape it for as long as you have the desire to improve yourself, you will continue to put as much effort necessary to reach that level of efficiency. However, though you don't just keep yourself busy, you should instead use your time to be productive. Being productive has way more value than doing busy work. I could spend plenty of time being busy with several distractions that go through any normal life. I could spend busy amounts of time searching various platforms for a desired lyric of a song, check my Facebook for my friend's posts all from today, or watch a silly video on the internet that serves no purpose other than to humor myself. Being busy is just another term now and days just to make it seem as though we are doing something of importance when in reality.....we're not. Now this is not always the case I am well aware of that. It is our go to when we are presented with something that is either relevant or irrelevant. In which case provokes us to show a sign or matter of signaling that we are engaged in other matters. It is purely instinctual because we love to just be consumed in our business first before wanting to do other things of equal or more interest. Instead of completely denying ourselves of pursuing other means of spending our time, we should spend less time being busy and have our time spent more effectively. To do this is to be productive so that we may spend our other reservoirs of time connecting and better communicating with others After all we owe it to ourselves to be well balanced in every facet of our lives, so we don't have to stress over nonsense that in no way is precious to our normal day lives or beneficial. Conflict will always arise in some form or another. To counteract such times you simply need to let go of distractions. Productive time makes everything that seems impossible...possible! While making a etiquette enhancement in your abilities to otherwise radically commence a change in your practice of habits/distractions. This may seem like such a simple change. Undeniably so it brings a greater impact to others than just yourself. Such a commitment can be seen from others and cause them to be moved in ways in their lives that don't have structure. Not everyone can conceive to such a notion on their own, sometimes it must be shown in full view to truly bask in the glory.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Health and Wellness
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
