While sexual assault is prominent in all industries, recent events have shown that Hollywood is currently going through a “purge”. After the staggering show of camaraderie by #MeToo, more women are feeling empowered and safe to come out about sexual harassment and, in certain cases, assault.

Which finally begs the question...

Is it morally imperative to separate the art from the artist?

When you’re binge-watching Frank Underwood in House of Cards spin lies into gold is it tainted now? Or can you compartmentalize his personal and possibly criminal life from his performance?

I can’t necessarily say that an artist’s personal life takes away from the art itself but I do feel that as a consumer I can choose where to spend my money and time. I know people argue that art and the artist should be kept separately but that is virtually impossible. Whether it is giving money to buy something or giving them more ratings for watching their show, it helps them. Whether we like it or not the world is money- and profit-driven.

If people say they would continue watching House of Cards or Weinstein produced movies after the recent scandals, companies like Netflix or Miramax would have no incentive to separate themselves from problematic people. So while we might not approve or like these individuals, we are nonetheless supporting them by continuing to be a consumer of their products.

So next time you’re about to buy Chick-fil-A fries or watch Louis C.K., think about whether there could be a better option... like Rhianna. You can never go wrong with Rhianna!