The Myers-Briggs Test Doesn't Lie

The Myers-Briggs Test Doesn't Lie

This test tells you who you are at your core - who you are on the inside.

If you know what the Myers-Briggs test is, the odds increased that you might have taken the test once or twice…

Or you’ve taken the test multiple times throughout the years to see if you’ve changed between your 13-year-old emo phase and the 18-year-old college student that you’ve become (guilty). Or even simply taking it for your own amusement to see where you stand in the world compared to other people (also guilty).

I don’t know about you, but if you’ve taken a psychology class, you’ve probably heard of these inventories- more than likely you’ve studied them. In all seriousness, this sort of personality inventory test is one that takes various traits of your personality and matches it to one of the 16 personality types created by Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers based off of Carl Jung’s personality inventory.

Some of the traits that define a personality type include extraversion/introversion, sensing/intuitive, feeling/thinking, and perceiving/judging. If you’re still looking for a formal definition of the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (aka MBTI), basically the test is, “An introspective self-report questionnaire with the purpose of indicating differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world around them and make decisions” according to the definition of the test on Wikipedia.

So, now that you have an idea of what this test is, it’s safe to assume that you might be tempted to take the test if you haven’t taken it, or maybe even haven’t taken it in a while, or even if you’re curious what your personality type is. The website I like/most commonly use is 16 Personalities.

It not only gives a free version of the test, but also gives details, descriptions, and information about relationships, both romantic and platonic relationships; it even gives career path advice. The website gives so much information about your personality type.

There’s been so many times that I read these personality trait informatives and even those little posts about “Ways to tell you’re an ENFP” or “Stuff ENFPs say,” among others.

There are even been times when I’ve read a post and sat there stunned at the seeming precision of how much my own personality traits and the way I am matches some of the parts of the true ENFP definition.

Also, can you tell I’m a proud ENFP?

But seriously, with each time that I take this test albeit a reliable test it’s not the real one, it reveals how much not only that your true personality doesn’t change, but rather evolves, but also how each person has specific traits that make them who they are. There are personality traits of an ENFP like curiosity, being friendly, or observant, and they match up with traits that I, throughout the years, have seen in myself and others have seen in me.

I might say it once, I might say it a hundred times: I’m an ENFP through and through.

Having probably taken this test more than the average human problem does, I’ve tracked the personality traits in myself in ways where I can see how each part of me- even the quirkier parts- is not transforming itself, but simply changing in a maturation way.

I admit, there were times growing up that I became less of an extrovert and started questioning my own personality. I do know that with the evolution of who I’m becoming throughout life I have still stayed me, confirmed by both this test. Like I said, I’ve probably taken this test more than the average human; it's who I am at my core.

Each person throughout their life should be able to see that who you are, at your core, doesn’t change fully. Yet, we can hide parts of ourselves that make it appear like we do, we never fully change who we are. Who we are builds a foundation for how we live our life. It builds a foundation for a career we can follow, for what we do with our lives.

As I mentioned before, the MBTI test is one that determines who we are at a glance, but it doesn’t determine who we make ourselves become and how we live our lives. It shows how we can live our lives to its potential and a test simply telling you the type of human you are, although living through that personality and even having the test tell you what you can do later in life can be beneficial.

This test doesn’t lie when telling you who you are at your core. The thing about it though, is that this test should be an introspective report, as the definition describes, but an introspective report helping you live up to the best you that you can be.

To embrace the quirks that come with your personality, the negative and positive aspects, and even some of your own habits. Life is about learning to embrace who you are. You are who you are for a reason and you’re a wonderful human being however you are. You may see it in yourself or other people, but we all change. Whether drastically or simply only a bit as time progresses, but we all develop into people we once weren’t or were a version shy of being.

So whether the odds are that you’ve just taken this test before reading the entire article or you are taking it for what feels like the millionth time, either for school or for your own amusement, remember who you are at your core and show those around you that you are no longer the 13-year old going through their emo phase or even how you’re growing up and out of the 18-year-old just starting their adventures through life.

Cover Image Credit: Angela Wynn

Popular Right Now

I Am A Female And I Am So Over Feminists

I believe that I am a strong woman, but I also believe in a strong man.

Beliefs are beliefs, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. I'm all about girl power, but in today's world, it's getting shoved down our throats. Relax feminists, we're OK.

My inspiration actually came from a man (God forbid, a man has ideas these days). One afternoon my boyfriend was telling me about a discussion his class had regarding female sports and how TV stations air fewer female competitions than that of males. In a room where he and his other male classmate were completely outnumbered, he didn't have much say in the discussion.

Apparently, it was getting pretty heated in the room, and the women in the class were going on and on about how society is unfair to women in this aspect and that respect for the female population is shrinking relative to the male population.

If we're being frank here, it's a load of bull.

SEE ALSO: To The Women Who Hate Feminism

First of all, this is the 21st century. Women have never been more respected. Women have more rights in the United States than ever before. As far as sports go, TV stations are going to air the sports that get the most ratings. On a realistic level, how many women are turning on Sports Center in the middle of the day? Not enough for TV stations to make money. It's a business, not a boycott against female athletics.

Whatever happened to chivalry? Why is it so “old fashioned" to allow a man to do the dirty work or pay for meals? Feminists claim that this is a sign of disrespect, yet when a man offers to pick up the check or help fix a flat tire (aka being a gentleman), they become offended. It seems like a bit of a double standard to me. There is a distinct divide between both the mental and physical makeup of a male and female body. There is a reason for this. We are not equals. The male is made of more muscle mass, and the woman has a more efficient brain (I mean, I think that's pretty freaking awesome).

The male body is meant to endure more physical while the female is more delicate. So, quite frankly, at a certain point in life, there need to be restrictions on integrating the two. For example, during that same class discussion that I mentioned before, one of the young ladies in the room complained about how the NFL doesn't have female athletes. I mean, really? Can you imagine being tackled by a 220-pound linebacker? Of course not. Our bodies are different. It's not “inequality," it's just science.

And while I can understand the concern in regard to money and women making statistically less than men do, let's consider some historical facts. If we think about it, women branching out into the workforce is still relatively new in terms of history. Up until about the '80s or so, many women didn't work as much as they do now (no disrespect to the women that did work to provide for themselves and their families — you go ladies!). We are still climbing the charts in 2016.

Though there is still considered to be a glass ceiling for the working female, it's being shattered by the perseverance and strong mentality of women everywhere. So, let's stop blaming men and society for how we continue to “struggle" and praise the female gender for working hard to make a mark in today's workforce. We're doing a kick-ass job, let's stop the complaining.

I consider myself to be a very strong and independent female. But that doesn't mean that I feel the need to put down the opposite gender for every problem I endure. Not everything is a man's fault. Let's be realistic ladies, just as much as they are boneheads from time to time, we have the tendency to be a real pain in the tush.

It's a lot of give and take. We don't have to pretend we don't need our men every once in a while. It's OK to be vulnerable. Men and women are meant to complement one another — not to be equal or to over-power. The genders are meant to balance each other out. There's nothing wrong with it.

I am all for being a proud woman and having confidence in what I say and do. I believe in myself as a powerful female and human being. However, I don't believe that being a female entitles me to put down men and claim to be the “dominant" gender. There is no “dominant" gender. There's just men and women. Women and men. We coincide with each other, that's that.

Time to embrace it.

Cover Image Credit: chrisjohnbeckett / Flickr

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Past Legal And Modern Social Apartheid

An opinion piece on past legal Apartheid in South Africa and how it is socially reflected in the United States.


When stepping inside of a solitary cell at Constitutional Hill in Johannesburg, I felt a tightness in my chest and wanted to leave that small space immediately; imagining a Black South African who broke the pass laws during Apartheid being in there is beyond disturbing. Due to laws such as the Native (Urban) Areas Act No 21 of 1923, the Bantu/Native Building Workers Act of 1951, and the Bantu Homelands Citizens Act of 1970, Black South Africans during Apartheid were extremely limited in where they could live, detrimentally affecting their economic and employment opportunities. When touring the former Constitutional Hill prison, the guide told us that, when Black South Africans were caught without passes permitting their stay in Joburg for the day and/or night, they spent 5 days in prison, along with murderers and others who committed serious crimes. If caught multiple times breaking these pass laws, they would spend 5 years in this prison. Most of those who violated these pass laws were unemployed or sought better employment in Joburg; this is understandable, as a person has a better chance of having a job by being there physically. When thinking further about the lack of opportunity they suffered from due to the aforementioned laws creating this effect, this legal repercussion becomes further and further disturbing. Additionally, this also directly led to the creation of "White" and "Black" areas, where Whites lived in areas of better opportunity (ex. cities, suburbia), and Blacks were subjected to living in poverty and townships where there was limited economic and employment opportunities.

This lack of opportunity is echoed in the U.S. when looking at socially designated "White" and "Black" areas. Trayvon Martin was murdered by George Zimmerman essentially because he thought Martin "was not where he belonged", which was in a nice suburban area. As a person of color myself, I have been stared at in museums, followed in stores, and once at 12 years old kicked out of a shop (I did not do anything wrong), because I "stuck out". In this way, society told me (and violently told Martin) that we don't belong in those areas, that we "belong" in ghettos or prison; the racial demographics of populations in U.S. prisons will support me here. Therefore, by society socially designating where people "belong", not only do they bind themselves in their own ignorance, but also prevent people of color from sharing the same access to plentiful life and economic opportunity.


Native (Urban) Areas Act No 21 of 1923: Prevented Black South Africans from leaving designated area without a pass. The ruling National Party saw this as keeping Whites "safe" while using Blacks for cheap labor.

Bantu/Native Building Workers Act of 1951: Allowed Black South Africans to enter the building industry as artisans and laborers. Restricted to "Native" areas. Prevented competition between Whites, Coloureds, and Blacks. Could not work outside a designated area unless given special permission.

Bantu Homelands Citizens Act of 1970: All Black South Africans would lose their South African citizenship/nationality over time. Would not be able to work in "South Africa" due to being aliens. Black South Africans would have to work inside their own areas and could only work in urban areas if they had special permission from the Minister.

South African History Online. "Apartheid Legislation 1850s-1970s." South African History Online, South African History Online, 11 Apr. 2016,

Related Content

Facebook Comments