I am full of many faults. We are all innately flawed human beings, and for the absolute majority of my life, I let this fact consume me. It is important to grow, and it is important to constantly work on the things about yourself that are not so good. But today I am going to take a break from that, and I am going to focus on why I am so happy to be me, flaws and all. Even though I'm not very good at doing crafty things, I still have really good taste. I hated the way that my hair laid when I cut it to my shoulders a few years ago, but I'm so excited because it is growing back quickly. It isn't quite where I want it to be yet, but it already hangs halfway down my back, and I am so impressed by my hairs ability to do exactly what I hope for it to do. I never have been the best at math and science, but I could write essay after essay and never once get tired of writing. I'm not very good at leaving a good impression on someone right away, but when people are patient with me, I am so lovable! I am not super clever, but I still can make people laugh. I didn't get the job that I really wanted last Spring, but I got an even better one that I will be starting in the Fall which goes to show that things really do end up working out for me, even when I become discouraged. I am goal oriented and driven to the point that it can annoy others, but I am grateful for these traits because it means that I am a hard worker. I am one of those weirdos that loves vegetables just as much as fruit, which (almost) cancels out that I love junk food as well. I always like to try new things, and I am rarely ever stuck in my ways. I'm nearly always caring and observant, and I love to work with people. Even though I dislike that I am extremely shy, I absolutely love being introverted. Even though I am a sinner by default, I love being His daughter, and I know that He loves me right back. I love that I am goofy. I don't always love the gap between two of my teeth, but I love that my smile is big and loose. I love that I ineract easily with cats and dogs, and I love that they almost always enjoy interacting with me too. I love that I like to read and that I like to take pictures too. I have a wide set of interests, and I always see a lot of good in other people. The point is, even though I am flawed and should be working on my flaws, it is really important to recognize that I am a very special and good person too. Sometimes I don't take enough time to give myself credit. When I sit down and think about what I love about myself, it makes it easier to approach the things that I don't like with a level head. I'm so happy that I am me and I am becoming the person that I am, and I really hope that you feel the same way about yourself!
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Health and Wellness
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
