The Battle Between Hollywood And China

The Battle Between Hollywood And China

Nationalism at the box office.

A Kickstarter was recently started to fund Wolverine Entertainment, a production company aimed at fighting Chinese influence in Hollywood.

While it's doubtful that a single independent production company could fight the influence of China's growing film industry, they are responding to a very evident, and possibly concerning, trend.

While many American industries struggle to keep up with foreign competitors, Hollywood continues to dominate the international market. Other nations export manufactured goods and raw materials, but America's biggest export is its culture. The prospect of China coopting the international entertainment market is a tangible threat to the U.S. economy, considering the countless jobs created by Hollywood, but it represents an even bigger threat to the American ego.

The key to understanding the tension here is to see the fundamental difference between the Chinese and American film industries. According to a law passed last year, the Chinese film industry is obligated to serve the interests of the people and government of China. In the United States, however, the film industry is free to pursue its own interests, which may be distinct or every contrary to those of the U.S. government.

As much as Hollywood is accused of serving a variety of agendas, it is primarily interested in making money. In the interest of profit, Hollywood's biggest films are increasingly being directed at Chinese audiences, sometimes moreso than Americans. The most recent Transformers movie, for instance, made more money in China than it did in the U.S.

The problem here is that the global box office does not favor intelligent or well-written films. In order to translate easily across cultural boundaries, films have to focus on special effects over dialogue, character development, or any sort of social commentary. In essence, the wider the target audience becomes, the more bland and indistinct the movie must be. Any film that does not meet China's standards can expect to lose millions at the box office as a result. In other words, don't expect a blockbuster chronicling the Tiananmen Square protests anytime soon.

For all of China's influence in Hollywood, the Chinese film industry's attempts to go international continue to struggle. Last year's American-Chinese co-production The Great Wall seemingly set this cause back. The film likely covered its expenses, but it was a commercial disappointment in the U.S. In fact, the film's use of American stars in a Chinese narrative proved controversial, and it's possible American audiences would have responded better without being pandered to.

China's influence on American films is not ideal for a variety of reasons. However, it's important to remember that Hollywood became the cultural force it is today by drawing talent from around the world. In fact, if there is a silver lining to this trend, it's that American audiences may be exposed more to other cultures. After all, if China becomes an exporter of quality films, it would be downright xenophobic to reject them solely for their country of origin.

More quality films would be a win for filmgoers, regardless of where they are produced. The real problem is not China, it's bad movies.

Cover Image Credit: Universal Pictures

Popular Right Now

I'm A Woman And You Can't Convince Me Breastfeeding In Public Is OK In 2019

Sorry, not sorry.


Lately, I have seen so many people going off on social media about how people shouldn't be upset with mothers breastfeeding in public. You know what? I disagree.

There's a huge difference between being modest while breastfeeding and just being straight up careless, trashy and disrespectful to those around you. Why don't you try popping out a boob without a baby attached to it and see how long it takes for you to get arrested for public indecency? Strange how that works, right?

So many people talking about it bring up the point of how we shouldn't "sexualize" breastfeeding and seeing a woman's breasts while doing so. Actually, all of these people are missing the point. It's not sexual, it's just purely immodest and disrespectful.

If you see a girl in a shirt cut too low, you call her a slut. If you see a celebrity post a nude photo, you call them immodest and a terrible role model. What makes you think that pulling out a breast in the middle of public is different, regardless of what you're doing with it?

If I'm eating in a restaurant, I would be disgusted if the person at the table next to me had their bare feet out while they were eating. It's just not appropriate. Neither is pulling out your breast for the entire general public to see.

Nobody asked you to put a blanket over your kid's head to feed them. Nobody asked you to go feed them in a dirty bathroom. But you don't need to basically be topless to feed your kid. Growing up, I watched my mom feed my younger siblings in public. She never shied away from it, but the way she did it was always tasteful and never drew attention. She would cover herself up while doing it. She would make sure that nothing inappropriate could be seen. She was lowkey about it.

Mindblowing, right? Wait, you can actually breastfeed in public and not have to show everyone what you're doing? What a revolutionary idea!

There is nothing wrong with feeding your baby. It's something you need to do, it's a part of life. But there is definitely something wrong with thinking it's fine to expose yourself to the entire world while doing it. Nobody wants to see it. Nobody cares if you're feeding your kid. Nobody cares if you're trying to make some sort of weird "feminist" statement by showing them your boobs.

Cover up. Be modest. Be mindful. Be respectful. Don't want to see my boobs? Good, I don't want to see yours either. Hard to believe, I know.

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

There Are No More Government Shutdowns On The Horizon For Now, But The Future Is Unknown

Can the government shutdown occur again?


A $333 billion spending bill has been made for President Trump to sign to prevent any further government shutdowns. The bill says little about the broader the president is demanding to build. Other border security ideas are mentioned and funding for some departments that have been neglected because of the shutdown.

As for the border, there are some provisions. Texas' Rio Grande Valley border has built a 55-mile "pedestrian fencing" which cost about $1,375 billion. Trump is willing to sign this deal but also making an executive order by declaring a national emergency to get the border wall he wants. He explained it by saying, "We're going to confront the national security crisis on our southern border and we're going to do it one way or the other." He says we have to take action fast in order to stop the smuggling of drugs and human trafficking, which he says Mexico is responsible for.

President Trump is making a total of $8 billion dollars, spending from the executive order, national emergency, and the congressional appropriations bill. Senates leaders have given their opinion on it. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have given their statement, "The President's unlawful declaration over a crisis that does not exist does great violence to our Constitution and makes America less safe, stealing from urgently needed defense funds for the security of our military and our nation."

This declaration of emergency is going to court, to make sure it is legal. Many leaders have opposed saying this is a fake emergency. Declaring an emergency lets the POTUS move around some money in the military-construction funds a total of $3.6 billion. That money will have to pull from other fundings to gain it. If Trump does not get his desired wall, we can expect another government shutdown.

Related Content

Facebook Comments