Bob Dylan Should Have Won The Nobel Prize A Long Time Ago

Bob Dylan Should Have Won The Nobel Prize A Long Time Ago

It's about time.
6
views

On Thursday, the Nobel Academy announced the recipient of the 2016 Nobel Prize for Literature. The winner? Bob Dylan. Dylan is the first musician to ever be awarded the prize. It's been viewed as a somewhat radical decision on the part of the committee, pushing the boundaries of what is viewed as literature, and what is not.

Responses to the news have been split into three camps: "Bob Dylan won the Nobel Prize this is amazing," "Bob Dylan? Meh. Who cares," and "But he's a musician!" I fall into the first category. Not only does Bob Dylan deserve this award, it's actually overdue.

For anyone who doesn't know, Bob Dylan is an extremely influential singer/songwriter. He began performing in New York in the 1960s and he's never really stopped. He's a folk musician, though some of his music is considered to be classic rock. He has an unusual voice, which means that people usually either love or hate his music, and he's famous for his harmonica. Dylan is an iconic figure in music, and while he has denied being "the voice of a generation," many feel that his songs embody the American experience in different eras.

Not only does his music appeal to the average person, his lyrics, unlike those of most songs, hold up incredibly well without musical accompaniment. Here's an excerpt from one of his most famous songs, "Blowin' in the Wind"

Yes, and how many times must a man look up
Before he can see the sky?
Yes, and how many ears must one man have
Before he can hear people cry?
Yes, and how many deaths will it take 'till he knows
That too many people have died?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind






(Listen to this song here.)


Academics have spent years analyzing his verses and agree that they hold up as poetry without the lyrics. His songs are taught at colleges around the country, and it is an agreed-upon fact that he changed the music industry.

But, according to the Academy, none of these are the reason he won the Nobel Prize. He didn't win because of his lyricism, but “for having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition.” He won for making new ways to write lyrics and expanding ideas of musical expression.

So, to everyone saying Dylan doesn't deserve this award, I'm sorry, but you're wrong.If Winston Churchill can win the same prize for the speeches he gave, then Dylan can win it for a lifetime of accumulated poetry.

He's been an active performer for 50 years. His lyrics are recognized as excellent poetry, without the aid of music. And, the Nobel Prize usually goes to a writer whose work shows social awareness. Robert Hillburn, a music critic from the Los Angeles Times who interviewed Dylan on multiple occasions said, "He made you think. He was talking about life, politics, civil rights — he made music the equivalent of books."

Bob Dylan fits all the criteria. Couple that with the fact that he's been considered for the Prize multiple times in the past and never won, and it's not surprising that he won.

It's just time.




Cover Image Credit: Flickr Creative Commons

Popular Right Now

I'm The Girl Without A 'Friend Group'

And here's why I'm OK with it

916129
views

Little things remind me all the time.

For example, I'll be sitting in the lounge with the people on my floor, just talking about how everyone's days went. Someone will turn to someone else and ask something along the lines of, "When are we going to so-and-so's place tonight?" Sometimes it'll even be, "Are you ready to go to so-and-so's place now? Okay, we'll see you later, Taylor!"

It's little things like that, little things that remind me I don't have a "friend group." And it's been like that forever. I don't have the same people to keep me company 24 hours of the day, the same people to do absolutely everything with, and the same people to cling to like glue. I don't have a whole cast of characters to entertain me and care for me and support me. Sometimes, especially when it feels obvious to me, not having a "friend group" makes me feel like a waste of space. If I don't have more friends than I can count, what's the point in trying to make friends at all?

I can tell you that there is a point. As a matter of fact, just because I don't have a close-knit clique doesn't mean I don't have any friends. The friends I have come from all different walks of life, some are from my town back home and some are from across the country. I've known some of my friends for years, and others I've only known for a few months. It doesn't really matter where they come from, though. What matters is that the friends I have all entertain me, care for me, and support me. Just because I'm not in that "friend group" with all of them together doesn't mean that we can't be friends to each other.

Still, I hate avoiding sticking myself in a box, and I'm not afraid to seek out friendships. I've noticed that a lot of the people I see who consider themselves to be in a "friend group" don't really venture outside the pack very often. I've never had a pack to venture outside of, so I don't mind reaching out to new people whenever.

I'm not going to lie, when I hear people talking about all the fun they're going to have with their "friend group" over the weekend, part of me wishes I could be included in something like that. I do sometimes want to have the personality type that allows me to mesh perfectly into a clique. I couldn't tell you what it is about me, but there is some part of me that just happens to function better one-on-one with people.

I hated it all my life up until very recently, and that's because I've finally learned that not having a "friend group" is never going to be the same as not having friends.

SEE ALSO: To The Girls Who Float Between Friend Groups

Cover Image Credit: wordpress.com

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

After 'Extremely Wicked' And 'The Stranger Beside Me,' We Now Understand The Criminal Mind Of Ted Bundy

1 hour and 50 minutes, plus 550 pages later.

1921
views

Netflix recently released a movie in May called "Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil, and Vile" (2019), based on the life of Ted Bundy from his girlfriend's viewpoint.

In 1980, an author and former Seattle police officer, Ann Rule, published a book about her experience and personal, close friendship with Ted Bundy, called "The Stranger Beside Me."

These two sources together create an explosion of important information we either skim over or ignore about Ted Bundy. Watching this movie and reading this book can really open your eyes to who Ted Bundy really was. Yeah, there are the confession tapes on Netflix, too, but these other things can really tie it all into one big masterpiece of destruction.

I swear, it will blow your mind in different ways you never thought possible.

In the movie, "Extremely Wicked", Zac Efron stars as the infamous Ted Bundy, America's most notorious serial killer. He portrayed the murderer who kidnapped, killed, and raped 30 women or more. Personally, he made a great Ted Bundy, mannerisms and all. Lily Collins stars as Ted's girlfriend who was easily manipulated by Ted and believed that he was innocent for years.

The movie is told in the order that Liz, Ted's girlfriend, remembers.

In the book, "The Stranger Beside Me", Ann Rule writes about Ted Bundy, who used to be her old friend. They met while working at a crisis center in the state of Washington and were close ever since. Like Liz, Ann believed he was innocent and that he was incapable of these horrific crimes.

Ted Bundy had made both Liz and Ann fools. He easily manipulated and lied to both women about many things for years, his murders being "one" of them.

Okay, so we all know that Ted Bundy was absolutely guilty as hell and totally murdered those women. 30 women or more. He literally confessed to that, but researchers and authorities believe that number to be way higher.

But... you must know that the movie and the book tell two different stories that lead to the same ending. That's why it's so intriguing.

At one point, I couldn't stop watching the movie. Then, I bought Ann Rule's book and was completely attached to it. I couldn't put it down.

For me, Ted Bundy is interesting to me. Unlike most young girls today, I don't have a thing for him nor do I think he's cute or hot. I know that he used his charm and looks to lure women into his murderous trap. That's why it's so hard to understand why this movie and book created a new generation of women "falling in love" with Ted Bundy.

GROSS: He sodomized women with objects. He bludgeoned women with objects or his own hands. He was a necrophile. Look those up if you have not a clue of what they mean. That could change your mind about your own feelings for Ted Bundy.

After "Extremely Wicked" and "The Stranger Beside Me", I now understand the criminal mind of Ted Bundy. He was insane, but he was also smart, put together, educated, charming, and lots more. That's why I'm so interested in why his brain was the way it was.

The criminal mind is an interesting topic for me anyway, but for Ted Bundy, it was amazing to learn about.

I highly recommend both the movie and the book I quickly read in two weeks! If you want answers, they are there.

Related Content

Facebook Comments