It should always be the main goal in college to get your degree. It is what most would say the "prime directive" when we are thinking of college. In today's society it is truly uncertain of you getting into top business practice, if you don't have a degree of some kind in the field you are choosing to apply for and make a living off of. Especially if you want to stand the best chance because there are probably more individuals than just you going for the same job. Yes get the degree and you have the job.....really? Over time as you grow up through High School you begin notice that in some cases that is not the case. Some people on their application may have one leg up on you. The reason why is based off of their connections. People that they know who deliberately enhance their status with their own status, and share experiences that they have shared together. Now it's not just that they have a high status but that their background and expertise relates to the job you are looking into. Unfortunately not everyone has this amazing perk at their disposal whenever they choose. It is a developed relationship that becomes what it is over time. Now in High School the pool of people to talk to and have that kind of connection is very rare. That is where college comes into play. In college you are given a widespread of all professionals within almost any category of work you are set for. You can't go wrong with any of them from professors, coaches, administrators, to even the president himself. All of them can add up to you having a job maybe even before you graduate. If not a job it can also turn into internships, so that you may not only gain knowledge but even more connections in the facility you are working in. Only factor that can block from these chances in developing your status is getting too sucked up into other matters. For instance going to parties, traveling around, getting to involved with other people and their matters. It's nothing bad to have fun but in the long you are where you are because of the decisions you made. Initially as a freshman try to leave everything else to the next few years, and really work to choose your path in life. Staying committed to your school work is what is important. That means getting on good terms with the higher up people who facilitate the college you are getting your degree from. It may seem hard and less than necessary, you managing this skill of communicating is not something you can use enough for sure. Plan your future and make the adjustments necessary to seal it.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Student Life![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
