As Justin Bieber says, "Maybe you should go and love yourself." Well, you should love yourself. It will be the best decision you make.
Self-love is one of the most important aspects of an individual's life. Loving yourself results in happiness, confidence and positivity. Loving yourself is one of the best things that you can do for yourself. Once you learn to love yourself, you will learn what happiness is. Because If you can't love yourself, how are you supposed to love someone else?
Once you learn to love yourself everything else will fall into place. Once you stop forcing certain aspects of your life, everything will work out. Once you stop searching for love, and instead focus on yourself, love will find you when you are least expecting it.
Until you find that someone special, even when you do find that someone special, who else is going to be there at 3 a.m. when you're crying, shaking and wishing everything would end? Who is going to be there? The answer is you. You will have to pick yourself up and pull yourself together.
Unless you learn to love yourself, you will not be able to pull yourself together. When you have a bad day, you have to figure out how to make it better. You can't rely on others to fix it. You can only rely on yourself in the end.
In the end, the only person you can trust and ultimately rely on is yourself. You should be your own best friend. You should be capable of being alone. In fact, you should learn to be alone and enjoy being alone.
Spending time by yourself is one of the most enjoyable and relaxing things you can do. It helps you find yourself and truly realize who you are. Spending time by yourself helps you realize what you love and what you deserve.
Love yourself so that way when you do find someone and they treat you negatively you have the power to walk away. By loving yourself you will be able to stand up for yourself. You will not feel alone when you do end up walking away if you have self-love. By loving yourself you are setting standards for how others will treat you.
It is not selfish to love yourself. It is healthy and beautiful. Make your happiness a priority over anyone else's until and when that special person comes along. By loving yourself you realize that you do not need anyone but yourself. At the end of the day, all you have is yourself. Until that special person comes along, put all that effort into yourself, so you can be the best you that you can be. Ultimately, until then, be the best you can be and worry about loving yourself unconditionally, rather than how much others love you.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Relationships![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
