Why Are Women's Pants' Pockets Basically Nonexistent?

Why Are Women's Pants' Pockets Basically Nonexistent?

Everything was fine until the patriarchy decided women didn't need to carry things around with them.
6092
views

Back in high school, arguably one of the most terrifying periods of your life (right after the crippling self-doubt of your college years, of course), I had gotten into a rather animated conversation with a male friend of mine over why women always carried around big purses or purses in general. Even though I was young and sweet, only 17 (see what I did there?), I was already well versed in the subject of pocket inequality and launched into a full-scale lecture on the injustice of the female pants pocket size, highlighting all the key concepts from the inefficiency of the front pocket to the downright betrayal of the fake-pocket.

When I began to delve into the finer details of pocket inequality and just how much it pissed me off, my male friend quickly cut me off and said something along the lines of, “Jesus Rena, it’s honestly not that big of a deal. Don’t get so worked up about it.”

Needless to say, I severed all ties with him.

Just kidding, I only seriously considered it. But here’s the thing; pockets are a big deal. And most members of the male species don’t understand how big of a deal decently sized pockets are because they already have them!

The History of Women's Pockets (or lack thereof)

The history of the small pocket goes back a lot further than you’d expect and it’s riddled with subtle and not-so-subtle sexism. Women have been demanding built-in storage space in their clothes for centuries.

Women’s clothes didn’t really have internal pockets until the 18th century. The earliest pockets were pouches hidden underneath the petticoat of their poofy dresses that were tied around the waist.

These “pockets” were basically impossible to access in public since they were underneath so much clothing. It wasn’t until later in the 1700s when the pouches became a fashion accessory, that slits were made in the dress to allow easier access. These pouches were often elaborately embroidered and were used to store a variety of items.

The Victorian era was when things started to suck and pockets fell out of favor. Gone were the big ball gowns. The slimming Grecian-inspired look was in and that left no room for big pockets, or any pockets really.

But women still needed a place to keep all their stuff, and so the purse was born. The ancestor of the modern day purse, the reticule, was basically useless. They were tiny bags that women would carry in their hands that didn’t have room for anything. These bags were intricately designed and seen as a status symbol. Richer women would have smaller bags because they didn’t need to use their hands. Larger reticules were looked down upon because it meant that their owners worked and did, you know, normal, everyday things. instead of lounging around all day.

The game changed when women began wearing pants in the 1930s because they had to take over many of the men’s jobs while they were off fighting the war. At first, these pants were fully functional with pockets the same size as men’s pants (probably because they were men’s pants).

However, once it was determined that women were going to keep wearing pants even after the World Wars, designers decided to make trousers more slimming and appealing to the female figure. So history repeated itself and the Pocket Excommunication of the 19th century recurred in the 1940s. And we’ve been complaining about our small pockets ever since.

Why does this matter?

Women are just as active as men, sometimes even more so. And while purses are nice, they’re a hassle. Purses were literally made to be used as a statement that women who don’t need to use their hands, and therefore don’t work, are more feminine. Bulky pockets took away from that femininity. Designers chose attractiveness over functionality with women’s pockets and then started a whole separate industry for purses that’s fueled by the lack of pockets in female clothes.

Well, I say screw it! I’m tired of complaining about my pocket sizes, fake pockets, and no pockets. I’m definitely tired of people asking me why I don’t carry a purse. Purses get in the way. Pockets are a functional feature in pants and shouldn’t be omitted just because someone somewhere decided that it would make women’s hips look less attractive.

We are past the point where we can just sit silently with our large phones in our hands or lost in the chasm that is our purse. It’s time we women had actual pockets.

Cover Image Credit: LadyClever

Popular Right Now

I'm The Girl Who'd Rather Raise A Family Than A Feminist Protest Sign

You raise your protest picket signs and I’ll raise my white picket fence.
449471
views

Social Media feeds are constantly filled with quotes on women's rights, protests with mobs of women, and an array of cleverly worded picket signs.

Good for them, standing up for their beliefs and opinions. Will I be joining my tight-knit family of the same gender?

Nope, no thank you.

Don't get me wrong, I am not going to be oblivious to my history and the advancements that women have fought to achieve. I am aware that the strides made by many women before me have provided us with voting rights, a voice, equality, and equal pay in the workforce.

SEE ALSO: To The Girl Who Would Rather Raise A Family Than A Feminist Protest Sign

For that, I am deeply thankful. But at this day in age, I know more female managers in the workforce than male. I know more women in business than men. I know more female students in STEM programs than male students. So what’s with all the hype? We are girl bosses, we can run the world, we don’t need to fight the system anymore.

Please stop.

Because it is insulting to the rest of us girls who are okay with being homemakers, wives, or stay-at-home moms. It's dividing our sisterhood, and it needs to stop.

All these protests and strong statements make us feel like now we HAVE to obtain a power position in our career. It's our rightful duty to our sisters. And if we do not, we are a disappointment to the gender and it makes us look weak.

Weak to the point where I feel ashamed to say to a friend “I want to be a stay at home mom someday.” Then have them look at me like I must have been brain-washed by a man because that can be the only explanation. I'm tired of feeling belittled for being a traditionalist.

Why?

Because why should I feel bad for wanting to create a comfortable home for my future family, cooking for my husband, being a soccer mom, keeping my house tidy? Because honestly, I cannot wait.

I will have no problem taking my future husband’s last name, and following his lead.

The Bible appoints men to be the head of a family, and for wives to submit to their husbands. (This can be interpreted in so many ways, so don't get your panties in a bunch at the word “submit”). God specifically made women to be gentle and caring, and we should not be afraid to embrace that. God created men to be leaders with the strength to carry the weight of a family.

However, in no way does this mean that the roles cannot be flipped. If you want to take on the responsibility, by all means, you go girl. But for me personally? I'm sensitive, I cry during horror movies, I'm afraid of basements and dark rooms. I, in no way, am strong enough to take on the tasks that men have been appointed to. And I'm okay with that.

So please, let me look forward to baking cookies for bake sales and driving a mom car.

And I'll support you in your endeavors and climb to the top of the corporate ladder. It doesn't matter what side you are on as long as we support each other, because we all need some girl power.

Cover Image Credit: Unsplash

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Dear America, We Can Step Forward As A Country If We Stop Believing That Only One Belief Is Valid

It's time to promote unity and emphasize our commonalities because only through unity can we step forward as a country.

309
views

Dear America,

2018 was a year of political strife and conflict. The left and the right fought constantly. Republicans and Democrats blamed each other for the tiniest mistakes, and there were only a small number of successful bipartisan deals. Politicians and citizens alike seemed more concerned with sticking to party platforms, even ones they truly didn't believe in, rather than compromising with the other side to improve our society.Yet all this name-calling and hatred — what does it do in the end? What does it accomplish?

We've only seen an increased polarization of American politics and an expanded hostility towards "the other side." We don't consider the well-being of each and every person in America and the bettering of our society, or the building of a stronger world for our children and grandchildren.

We spend so much time insulting each other's political beliefs that we forget probably the most important fact that links us all together: We are all human. We all share the same basic needs, the same struggles, the same moments of happiness and sadness.

And yet we are willing to put our similarities aside and only focus on our differences. We are willing to thrust ourselves into the deep anger and loathing that comes in attacking those different from us. We are willing to parry insults behind the safety of a phone screen and forget all about what makes us alike. And we are willing to gloss over the fact that we have more similarities than differences.

SEE ALSO: Dear Trump, Thanks For Transforming Me Into A Responsible, Educated Citizen

Yes, political beliefs make a person. Political beliefs define the values, ideas and thoughts of a person. But sometimes, we have to reach over those beliefs, as hard as that may be, and focus on the bigger picture at hand. What will insulting someone because of those beliefs do? It definitely won't change their views or make them see things from your point of view.

It's sad and frustrating that this endless fighting doesn't even occur between two countries or two governments or two nation-states. Instead, we see arguments and strife between two family members, two neighbors or even two strangers, all living in the same community and under the same government, all sharing more similarities than differences.

We need to stop focusing so much on singular ideas. We need to stop believing in the close-minded idea that only one thought is the best thought. And instead of wasting energy trying to change other's opinions, we need to use that energy and time to promote unity and emphasize our commonalities.

These past few years have truly divided America. Let's make 2019 a year of unity, because only through unity can we step forward as a country.

Related Content

Facebook Comments