Undermining The Utilitarian Argument For The Survival Lottery
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

Undermining The Utilitarian Argument For The Survival Lottery

Enough college clickbait; let's get philosophical.

Undermining The Utilitarian Argument For The Survival Lottery
Seeking Alpha

John Harris’ suggestion of a “survival lottery” to minimize the number of innocent deaths as a result of organ failure is an influential idea, albeit one that’s hard to swallow. Despite the merit of his well-constructed argument, however, I don’t necessarily believe that all utilitarians must be in favor of such a system; that is to say, I don’t believe that the survival lottery would always increase the greater good. In this paper I am going to argue that there is too much ambiguity in whether or not the survival lottery would actually increase the world’s overall wellbeing for all utilitarians to be required to support it. I will do this by first exploring two key assumptions relied upon by the utilitarian argument in support of the survival lottery, and then highlighting scenarios that undermine one of these assumptions. I will ultimately conclude that there are situations that would have a negative or neutral impact on the greater good, and that they would occur frequently enough in practice to undermine the solidity of the utilitarian argument for such a system.

The utilitarian argument in favor of a survival lottery relies primarily upon the assumption that all lives are of equal value. This is a widely used assumption in ethics, and it is one I can stand by for the sake of this paper. If you can save two lives by sacrificing one, it seems intuitive that this is for the greater good; the classic trolley thought problem often highlights this intuition. But while I can stand by this first assumption, there is a second by which I can’t: the assumption that each life has an equal impact on those around it. This assumption follows from the impartiality clause that requires utilitarians to treat all individuals equally and thus ignore or disbelieve of the special impact each life has on the world around it. I find this to be a grand oversight.

Take, for example, an old man who lives alone with no family or friends. His life still has value, of course, but he has no direct influence over anyone around him. If he were to be picked to give up his organs in the survival lottery he would be unhappy, but no one else would be greatly affected (with the exception of the individuals to whom his organs would be given, and I assume they would be quite happy with those effects). On the other hand, imagine a mother of three children who goes to work each day to support her family, comes home and offers comfort and love to her husband and children, and is an integral part of their lives. If she were to be chosen to sacrifice her life in the survival lottery, it would have a much larger negative impact on the overall welfare than if the aforementioned man was. How could we be sure that this negative impact would be compensated for by the positive impact of lives being saved? What if, for example, the individuals being rescued by this mother’s organs were lonely people who did not have families or friends relying upon them? I believe that we could then make the argument that even though two lives were saved at the expense of one and those lives had equal value, they did not have equal impacts on the lives around them. We must consider how the untimely death of each individual would affect the rest of the world beyond the scope of a life’s intrinsic value.

There are countless other scenarios you could imagine in which the greater good might actually be decreased by the survival lottery; perhaps the forced donor was about to cure cancer and the donee was about to become a serial killer. These are extreme examples, but they make the point: you could not always be certain that the survival lottery would be for the greater good. Sometimes it would, of course; say you switched the roles of the cancer cure-er and the serial killer. But there would be enough times that the impact on the world’s wellbeing would be negative or neutral to call into question the solidity of the system. If the survival lottery was sometimes beneficent and sometimes maleficent, would it really be any better than the way the world is now?

While Harris’ argument is compelling and there is much more to be said on the topic, I believe there is enough evidence to suggest that utilitarians might not actually be required to support all instances of the survival theory. Unless it can be proved that all lives and deaths have an equal impact on the world around them, the argument cannot fully hold.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

100 Reasons to Choose Happiness

Happy Moments to Brighten Your Day!

A man with a white beard and mustache wearing a hat

As any other person on this planet, it sometimes can be hard to find the good in things. However, as I have always tried my hardest to find happiness in any and every moment and just generally always try to find the best in every situation, I have realized that your own happiness is much more important than people often think. Finding the good in any situation can help you to find happiness in some of the simplest and unexpected places.

Keep Reading...Show less

Remember The True Meaning of Christmas

“Where are you Christmas? Why can’t I find you?”

A painting of the virgin Mary, the baby Jesus, and the wise men

It’s everyone’s favorite time of year. Christmastime is a celebration, but have we forgotten what we are supposed to be celebrating? There is a reason the holiday is called Christmas. Not presentmas. Not Santamas. Not Swiftmas. Christmas.

boy standing in front of man wearing santa claus costume Photo by __ drz __ on Unsplash

What many people forget is that there is no Christmas without Christ. Not only is this a time to spend with your family and loved ones, it is a time to reflect on the blessings we have gotten from Jesus. After all, it is His birthday.

Keep Reading...Show less
Golden retriever sat on the sand with ocean in the background
Photo by Justin Aikin on Unsplash

Anyone who knows me knows how much I adore my dog. I am constantly talking about my love for her. I attribute many of my dog's amazing qualities to her breed. She is a purebred Golden Retriever, and because of this I am a self-proclaimed expert on why these are the best pets a family could have. Here are 11 reasons why Goldens are the undisputed best dog breed in the world.

Keep Reading...Show less

Boyfriend's Christmas Wishlist: 23 Best Gift Ideas for Her

Here are the gifts I would like to ask my boyfriend for to make this season unforgettable.

Young woman opening a Christmas gift

Recently, an article on Total Sorority Move called 23 Things My Boyfriend Better Not Get Me For Christmas, was going around on social media. I hope the author of this was kidding or using digital sarcasm, but I am still repulsed and shocked by the lack of appreciation throughout this article. I would like to represent the girlfriends out there who disagree with her standpoint -- the girlfriends who would be more than happy to receive any of these gifts from their boyfriends.

Keep Reading...Show less
Two teenage girls smiling

The 2000s were a time that many young adults today can look back on, joyfully reminisce and somewhat cringe at the trends and the fads that we all used to love and adore. Here's a list of things from the golden 2000s that will have one feeling nostalgic about all of those times.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments