Why You Can't Be Pro-Life And Pro-Women's Rights
Health and Wellness

You Might Say You're 'Pro-Life' But All I Hear Is 'Anti-Women's Rights'

Denying a woman the right to choose what happens to her body is anti-women's rights.

703

I recently stumbled across an article whose title intrigued me: "Just because I'm Pro-Life Doesn't Mean I'm Anti-Women's Rights, You Can Be Both." My idea of pro-life has always been something rather simple—the denial of a woman's right to choose. While pro-choice isn't exactly anti-life, pro-life is the exact same as anti-choice.

Wanting someone to have a fresh opinion on this whole abortion debate, I clicked the article. I can get behind the introduction; the author is definitely for equality with most aspects of a woman's life. When I got to the third paragraph though, I was disappointed. Just like a lot of pro-life people, she compared abortion to murdering a child.

To make things even worse in my mind, she cited that the "baby" has separate DNA from conception. This is partially true. Sure, the sex cells that meet together have the same DNA that the child will have if it makes it to birth, but that isn't a baby yet. It's a zygote. It's something the mother may not even be aware of yet, and it's something that could be completely unwanted.

It could also be completed wanted, planned and loved, but end up threatening the mother's life. I'll talk about the fun grey area of unwanted but necessary abortions after I talk about the next citation.

She leaves a link for us to follow if we want more information about life starting at conception, but guess when the most recent study was done—1997! The last study that claimed life began at conception was over two decades ago. As a scientific mind, I want something that's less than a decade old. In fact, that's what I was taught to look for.

The more recent, the better.

But that isn't the point of this article. I'm not writing about this person to bash her out-of-date sources; I'm writing to say that you can't be pro-life and pro-women's choice.

Remember what I mentioned a few paragraphs ago? How a zygote could be completely wanted and loved, but end up putting the mother's life at risk? Which is more important: the mother or the not-yet-born-may-still-die-child? Not every woman that seeks an abortion wants to "kill her child."

Sure, she covers her ass by mentioning a "normal pregnancy" very fleetingly, but people calling women baby-killers outside of Planned Parenthood aren't going to know who is there out of choice and who is there out of need.

Here's some food for thought: What if a rape victim has a perfectly normal pregnancy that could be carried to term?

Another scenario: What if the parent(s) wouldn't have the ability or even want to care for an unwanted child?

I'm not anti-life, and I don't support killing babies.

However, if I had a friend who needed an abortion because she was raped? If she had no ability to care for herself, let alone a child? If she made a big mistake and couldn't stand the life that she and her child would have to lead? I wouldn't call her a murderer. I wouldn't tell her she killed her child out of her own selfishness.

I would be there to comfort her, to console her, to make sure she knew the world didn't hate her, just like I would hope someone would do for me if I was in that position.

If your stance is that a woman should be forced to carry a child she doesn't want, then your stance is anti-women's rights.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

Everyone remembers the first time they went to one of the Disney parks. Spinning in teacups and having Goofy wrap his arms around my 8-year-old self were some of my fondest childhood memories, and I'm surely not alone in that.

Keep Reading... Show less
Lifestyle

These Superfood Beauty Products Show Kale And Matcha Work For SO Much More Than We Thought

Just another summer's day with a cold glass of kombucha on my face.

I've been vegan for about six years now, so a love for fresh vegetables and superfoods has now become a core part of my being. Don't get me wrong. I love my indulgent, creamy pastas and truffle fries more than anyone. But I keep most of my focus on eating clean and healthy so I can indulge guilt-free.

But I'd say about a large part of my diet has always, unknowingly, included superfoods. Being Indian, lentils, beetroot, garlic, ginger, and whole grains have been core essentials on the family dinner table since I could digest solid foods.

Keep Reading... Show less

Now that college is around the corner for most if not all young adults, students once shook by a pandemic now have to shift their focus on achieving their career goals. As if we thought we had it together already! As an NYC girl, I have always seen myself as a hustler, hungry to advance my career in journalism by having one skill: working hard.

Keep Reading... Show less
Lifestyle

5 BBQ Essentials Every Vegan Should Bring To Avoid Summer Cookout FOMO

You'll have your whole family drooling when you bring these goodies over too.

All vegetarians and vegans can relate when I say this: summer barbecues aren't fun when there's nothing you can eat.

Keep Reading... Show less

Kourtney Kardashian has decided to leave "Keeping Up With The Kardashians" after nearly 14 years and although we saw this coming, it breaks our heart that she won't be there to make us laugh with her infamous attitude and hilarious one-liners.

Kourtney is leaving the show because it was taking up too much of her life and it was a "toxic environment" for her.

Keep Reading... Show less
Health and Wellness

We Asked You How You Felt About Resuming 'Normal' Activities, And Some Of Your Answers Shocked Us

The New York Times asked 511 epidemiologists when they'd feel comfortable doing "normal" activities again, considering COVID-19. We asked our peers the same thing, for science.

Last month, the New York Times surveyed about 500 epidemiologists asking about their comfort level with certain activities once deemed normal — socializing with friends, going to the doctor, bringing in the mail. That's all well and good for the experts, but they are a very niche group, not the majority of the population. What do "normal" people feel safe doing? In certain states, we've seen how comfortable everyone is with everything (looking at you, Florida), but we wanted to know where Odyssey's readers fell on the comfort scale. Are they sticking with the epidemiologists who won't be attending a wedding for another year, or are they storming the sunny beaches as soon as possible?

Keep Reading... Show less
Facebook Comments