Paris Climate Agreement: Good Or Bad?
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

Paris Climate Agreement: Good Or Bad?

This is not an argument that we should all abandon being stewards to our environment, or that we should purposefully destroy the earth.

79
Paris Climate Agreement: Good Or Bad?
Fusion TV

The idea of man-made climate change as an imminent danger is currently a very big topic throughout the world community. While there have been many steps towards reducing pollution and emissions, government elites across nations of the world thought it would be advantageous to enter into a world-wide agreement on the reduction of predominantly CO2 emissions. Hence, in 2015 United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC) gave the world the Paris Climate Accord. Recently President Trump has pulled the United States out of the agreement, stating it would not achieve the actual goal of reducing CO2 enough for the cost and it would hurt the American economy. Many critics of the accords have also stated it would do very little in the way of actually preventing global warming or climate change. Is this assertion founded in logic or misguided? Let’s look at the facts.

The Paris Climate Accord has four major goals:

  • To keep global temperatures "well below" 2.0C (3.6F) above pre-industrial times and "endeavor to limit" them even more, to 1.5C
  • To limit the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by human activity to the same levels that trees, soil, and oceans can absorb naturally, beginning at some point between 2050 and 2100
  • To review each country's contribution to cutting emissions every five years so they scale up to the challenge
  • For rich countries to help poorer nations by providing "climate finance" to adapt to climate change and switch to renewable energy.

This Paris Accord was created to replace the Kyoto Protocol which was deemed a failure when the United States failed to ratify it, and China was exempted from it as they were classified as a “developing nation”. Canada also dropped out of the Kyoto Protocol as reported by CNN, “Environment Minister Peter Kent says Kyoto's goals are unworkable because the United States and China never agreed to Kyoto, and that a new pact is needed to address emissions.” The western world was eager to resurrect a Climate Agreement in light of the Kyoto Protocol collapse.

The United States has been scolded by the United Nations and world leaders as one of the leading contributors to man-made climate change routinely citing the US greenhouse gas emission rates continue to rise. This was proven false by The Heritage Foundation, an organization that considers policy. Heritage reported this on the United States being the leading producer of greenhouse gases “Instead, since 2005, our [the United States] emissions are down by roughly 10 percent and almost twice that amount on a per capita basis.” When examining the data closer, green energy was not the main contributor to this decrease in emissions, rather an increase in low emission natural gas usage. According to Heritage, “The game-changer for the U.S. has been the shale oil and gas revolution over the past six years brought about through new smart drilling technologies. The U.S. is now the largest natural gas producer in the world. And as America has produced more natural gas, we have shifted away from coal. This, according to the Energy Information Administration, accounts for more than 60 percent of the carbon emission reductions in the United States.”

It is important to note as well that the Paris Accord would be destructive to the United States economy, creating a huge tax burden for the already debt-saddled taxpayer. According to Heritage, “the Paris Agreement would have cost the American economy $2.5 trillion dollars by 2035, with a total loss of income of $20,000 for a family of four over the same time period. Household electricity costs would have risen 13-20% more, while nearly 3,000,000 American workers would have lost their jobs.” These harmful economic effects are due to the sudden changes in the energy sector of the American economy in both the short and the long term. Regardless of whether you are a Conservative Republican or a Liberal Democrat, these economic impacts would devastate every working class/middle class American and affect the ability to actually execute on the terms of the Accord in the first place.

This is not an argument that we should all abandon being stewards to our environment, or that we should purposefully destroy the earth. What I am saying is that we need to be careful with how we approach combatting climate change. Lining the pockets of wealthy bureaucrats in the name of environmentalism is not the answer. We should not have to make extreme economic sacrifices in order to save the planet. We should invest more heavily in Nuclear Power, energy farming as well as natural gas production. These three methods of producing energy would produce more energy for a cheaper price with fewer emissions. For example, nuclear power on average only produces 29 tonnes of CO2/GWh, whereas oil produced 733 tonnes/GWh and Coal 888 tonnes/GWh. Natural gas also produced significantly fewer emissions at 499 tonnes/GWh than oil or coal. Above that, nuclear power has developed increasingly since the Chernobyl Accident in 1986 (which was caused by a flawed reactor design and inadequately trained personnel) and is now extremely safe and effective.

Each country should examine what works economically before we dedicate to giving money to global organizations that ultimately doesn’t cause any significant change. The Kyoto Protocol was a form of international law, which was signed by 192 countries. During the Protocols enforcement, emissions globally have not gone down in the numbers that environmentalists wanted to see even as it was mandatory for hundreds of nations. Why would the Paris Accord be any different for a voluntary agreement in which policies aren’t required to be instituted? In the end, it was a blessing for the American Public and bust for the policy-making elite that President Trump pulled the United States out of the Paris Climate Accords, as it would have a devastating impact on the economy. The advancement of technology in renewable energy such as solar and wind will eventually become economical at a large scale replacing the need for oil and coal, the biggest offenders of CO2 emissions. This will be driven by innovation and the consumer.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Featured

Ford Cars That We Love

There's a good chance we've all driven a Ford or spent a lot of time at Ford, but what are some of the best cars they've ever made?

12895
Ford Cars That We Love
Photo by Jessy Smith on Unsplash

There are arguably few bigger automakers than Ford. They are a company that shaped the auto industry as we know it today and with a solid reputation in the industry, our wide range of Ford leases has always been a popular choice among drivers.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

Prose: One Call

What if you had one call, but you could not say anything other than what you were told to say? In this short excerpt, Bethany finds herself at odds with her jailers and with the one she was told to call, the one she loves. What would you do when the conversation takes a turn off script?

10623
Prose: One Call
https://unsplash.com/s/photos/jail

With each incessant numbing ring of the phone call, I could feel the betrayal coiling around me like the phone line, squeezing me tighter.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

'Hotel Transylvania: Transformania' Film Review

Solid animation can't raise the newest entry in Sony's colorful monster series beyond the basics

73912
'Hotel Transylvania: Transformania' Film Review
Photo Credit: Amazon Prime Video – YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6suJohjIvfo

I take a slight issue with the idea that Adam Sandler didn’t have a good dramatic role until ‘Uncut Gems,’ what about ‘Hotel Transylvania’ (he says semi-seriously)?’

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

4 Common Reasons Couples Get Divorced

Are some people just not meant to be together? Is there any way to prevent an impending divorce?

94757
4 Common Reasons Couples Get Divorced

We've all heard the statistics. Roughly 50% of married couples eventually end up divorced. This can lead to complications, problems with your children, financial issues, and no small amount of negative emotions.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

​Pets are Good for the Soul

Millions of Americans have found comfort in pet ownership. The media has been awash with stories about a surge in pet ownership, as Americans have taken advantage of the ability of pets to improve emotional well-being.

86308
Good for the Soul
Pets are Good for the Soul

America is going through a mental health crisis. This crisis predates the global pandemic, but has in many ways been dramatically exacerbated by it. In 2019, 19.86% of adults, or 50 million Americans, reported suffering from a mental illness. The emotional toll of the pandemic has been heavy, with over half of U.S. adults saying that they have experienced stress and worry related to Covid-19. Anxieties over work, uncertainty about the future and other triggers have intensified the mental health crisis. Millions of Americans have found comfort in pet ownership. The media has been awash with stories about a surge in pet ownership, as Americans have taken advantage of the ability of pets to improve emotional well-being.

Keep Reading... Show less
Facebook Comments