A Literal Nazi Is Running Unopposed In Illinois

A Literal Nazi Is Running Unopposed In Illinois

How did we not learn from the election of Donald Trump?

It is 2018. Less than two years after the election of a man who has bragged about committing sexual assault, claiming an entire country of people are rapists and criminals, among other horrors.

If you thought that Donald Trump was the worst kind of human being that Republicans could produce with a Republican-dominated House, Senate and Oval Office, you were dead wrong.

In Illinois' Third Congressional District, a Holocaust denier by the name of Arthur Jones is running unopposed for the House seat. He is the Republican candidate, and according to some reports, the Republican party has admitted that the man is a "reformed" Nazi. His political website claims the Holocaust is nothing more than "an international extortion racket." He also used to be a leader of his local KKK chapter. Jesus Christ. You have to be kidding me.

To make matters worse (bet you didn't think it could get any worse), Illinois' Third Congressional District includes part of Chicago and its southwestern suburbs and has been a historically Democratic stronghold. The Illinois Republican Party released a statement saying it was difficult to find anyone to run against Jones because it is such a Democratic stronghold.

The Illinois Republican party statement continued to say that, “The Illinois Republican Party and our country have no place for Nazis like Arthur Jones. We strongly oppose his racist views and his candidacy for any public office, including the Third Congressional District.”

Few other than Jones himself believe he will win in the general this November. But that's sort of not at all the point. The point being here is that the Republican party was unable to find ANYONE else to run against this man for the Republican nomination, a man who, besides being a quite literal Nazi, is a racist, homophobic, xenophobic bigot whose views nearly mirror Trump's.

Did the Republicans learn nothing from the election of Donald Trump?

That's where I struggle with this "breaking news." How can you become so complacent to allow this man space to spew his hateful views, rather than step up to the plate to be the moderate this country desperately needs? How can you allow your party to nominate this man when you yourself have said he doesn't align with your views, nor the views of the Third Congressional District?

And here's the damn kicker. How can you claim that he doesn't support your views as a party when the nominee of your party has the same thoughts, the same "opinions" (if you can call them that)? If the Republican Party wasn't full of self-righteous contradictions before, they certainly do now.

The Republican Party is going up in flames, and I say let them burn.

Cover Image Credit: Pexels

Popular Right Now

Why The Walk Out Was Necessary For The Gun Control Conversation

The kids are our future and they're making sure we know it.

If you haven't heard about the March 14th Walk Out protest that took place in high schools all across the country, you may be living under a rock. The protest was posted all over social media and shared hundreds of times by passionate students in high schools from coast to coast. It was truly a movement and, like all movements before it, caused a lot of conversation and controversy amongst political parties, parents and really anyone who heard about it.

The Walk Out was organized by the organizers of the Women's March to push for gun reform and to honor students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school; the school where a month before, 17 students and faculty members were killed in cold blood by a shooter. Since that event the students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas spoke on national television in front of their peers and superiors alike, begging for stricter gun laws and citing the deaths of their friends and teachers as the reason why. Those senseless deaths deserved not to be in vain. On March 14th, the students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas walked out of their classes for 17 minutes - in honor of the 17 lives lost that day and to shout their message of stricter gun control loud and clear. These students were not the only ones who did so; thanks to social media, the Walk Out was shared on all platforms and students across the country united with their peers to honor the victims and ask that something be done to prevent more senseless acts of violence in our nation's schools. Despite being something these students felt strongly about, their act was the topic of much controversy in America; the topic of gun control is an incredibly divisive and partisan issue, and these students made sure it was clear what side they were on.

For one teacher in Oak Hall, Virginia, this Walk Out was not the answer. Many people were against the idea, claiming that students were only using it as an excuse to get out of class or to draw attention to themselves rather than the issue it was protesting. This sixth-grade teacher's counter to the movement quickly went viral, prompting more conversation and argument.

At first glance, the message is obvious and innocuous; it's blatantly clear that many of the perpetrators of school shootings in the past have cited mental illness or bullying as the reason they felt compelled to do what they did. The purpose behind the Walk Up Not Out campaign is to fix that, to spread kindness in our schools and hopefully derail a plan of mass murder by inviting someone to sit at your lunch table. It's not a revolutionary idea.

The problem with this campaign becomes clearer the longer you think about it. It is, in essence, victim shaming. By telling students that "just be[ing] nice" is all they need to do, the message of these killings being the students' fault that people feel the need to shoot up schools comes out pretty clearly. Even if this was not the intention of this counter-campaign, that is what is has become.

As a person who has grown up with and around mental illness, and has been in a high school where I saw and have firsthand experience with kids not being so nice to each other, I have never felt the need to grab a gun and take it with me to exact revenge on my peers. I know plenty of people that I went to high school with and connected with later who were bullied, by definition, who ate lunch alone, who never had partners for projects... None of these people ever thought that murdering their classmates was an answer to their problems. While it does seem like a cop out when these cases come to light, the underlying factor of extreme mental illness can not be smiled away. A person who feels the need to kill people is not going to lose that need by eating lunch with other students.

This epidemic of school shootings needs to come to an end. All of the students who walked out of their classrooms in protest of senseless violence, all of the students who are scared to go to school because what if they're next?, and all of the parents who now have to worry that maybe their child won't come home from somewhere they're supposed to be safe know this. Stricter gun control is a huge issue, one that will not be solved easily, but the conversation has to start somewhere. These students are our future, they will be voting in the next election, they will be voting at their state and local levels; these students have something to say and a whole lot of fire behind it.

Walk Up Not Out may very well have been started solely to undermine these students, but it is not a lost cause. These students are walking up to each other every day, talking about their futures and what they can do to ensure they see them. These students are walking up to the voting podiums, making choices to make sure they have the representation that will most showcase their ideals. These students are walking out of their classes to make sure their voices are heard, but they are walking up every day, to make their voices mean something.

Regardless of if you are for or against gun control, it is hard to argue that these students are not making a difference. They are starting the conversation and fighting for their own peace of mind. The kids are our future, and they're making sure we know it.

Cover Image Credit: https://cdn.saleminteractivemedia.com/associated-press/data/photos/2018/73/90e03728-35e2-45f3-b174-08cdca720976.jpg

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

The Gun Violence Epidemic In The U.S. Is Out Of Control And It Is Time We Make A Change

Many other countries have much stricter gun control and it is time the U.S. took notice.

It is a sad truth that gun violence in America has become a norm. While the issue is brought up in politics, regulations and laws tend to focus on mental health, arming others with guns, and pretty much anything but actual gun control. Nevertheless, according to The Guardian, there have been 1,624 mass shootings in 1,870 days in the U.S. This means about nine out of every ten days on average there has been a mass shooting.

A mass shooting is most often defined as an event when four or more people are shot during a single incident. In 2017 alone, there were 345 mass shootings, and as of February 21, there have been 34 in 2018. In two months, 34 mass shootings have occurred and the U.S. is no closer to stopping that number from rising. To compare, many other countries have much stricter gun control and it is time the U.S. took notice.

In Britain on August 20, 1987, the Hungerford gun massacre occurred when a lone gunman killed 16 people and then himself. The shooter, Michael Ryan, had a handgun and two semi-automatic rifles. After Hungerford, Britain cracked down and banned the right to own semi-automatic firearms, pump action weapons, and registration became mandatory. Nine years later, another mass shooting occurred with handguns. This led to the eventual banning of all cartridge ammunition handguns.

In Japan, there is a 1958 law on the possession of swords and firearms. It states no one shall possess a firearm or firearms except a shotgun, but still with high regulation. Prospective shotgun owners must attend and pass classes, writing and practical exams, psychological assessments, and extensive background checks.

In Australia, after a mass shooting resulting in 35 deaths by one gunman, gun control regulations swept the political scene. Part of the gun reform included a national gun buyback policy for all weapons that did not comply with the new licensing and registration system (automatic and semi-automatic rifles), which led to the buyback and melting down of more than 650,000 firearms in Australia.

In the countries that have suffered tragic gun violence and implemented gun control regulations, gun violence has shrunk considerably, especially in comparison to the U.S. It is estimated that Americans own 48% of the estimated 650 million civilian-owned guns worldwide. This news should be eye-opening, but it is common knowledge that of the high income and highly-developed nations, the U.S. having some of the worst rates of gun violence and gun-ownership is not surprising.

In the wake of the Parkland, FL Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in which tragically 17 people were shot and killed by an AR-15 style semi-automatic rifle, the students involved have brought about the #NeverAgain movement. The movement advocated for tighter gun regulations to prevent these kinds of tragic mass shootings and gun violence. This movement and many others like it that came before are vital to promoting the needed change in the U.S.
Cover Image Credit: flickr

Related Content

Facebook Comments