Revolutionary-Era Legislation And Self-Gratifying Liberalization

Revolutionary-Era Legislation And Self-Gratifying Liberalization

The future is now, Old Man.

Yeah, I hate the Electoral College.

Yeah, this opinion was incited by my attending a politics course at my liberal arts college. Yeah, I am young and mostly uneducated in the scope of politics.

Yeah, I still hate the Electoral College.

Jump back to a time way back when- a time when the skies still had the bite of winter but the burn of summer at sundown. It is at this time that I was leaving class. Leaving a particularly invoking class, I caught one last glimpse at my peers’ words to “hear out your opposing side” and “listen to understand, not just to respond” that were freshly jotted in the already doodle-filled margins before packing my journal.

Closing my notebook seemingly also closed the route I believed that afternoon was intended to take. Stomping down stairs, slamming open doors, and finally re-emerging into the sweet orange of 5 o'clock, I realized how noisy my brain was with post-class thoughts and thunks. I needed to reflect on this class- now. The discussion was that good.

I quickly wondered how I’d listen to the “other side”, what issue should I side with, and what others were I inevitably about to get to know? These questions subsided as the practically forgotten memory of our asking about the Electoral College grew from an inkling of a thought into a full train of them. This was the moment. The conception of a hatred towards Revolutionary-era legislation.

One line of my note’s section resonated the whole walk home in that orangey warm that finally provoked me into action.

“If you want to change the world, you need to know the world…”

Within the confines of that classroom, upon hearing this statement came visions of grand Euro-trips and other travel-based day dreams, but by scrapping that, I tuned into the sentence’s more primary conclusion- “get up and go understand.”

“What is the point of the Electoral College,” I type into Google’s search bar.

Lauren, your bias is showing.

My stance is seemingly simple for a governmentally uneducated girl. Is it true fair to have the very few (538 to be exact) represent the very many (voting for the past election was about 130 million Americans)? The answer- unsure. The Lauren answer- duh of course not.

As is the way of my attending a liberal arts college in the midst of my generation’s social justice uprising- I inherently feel as if I know what I’m talking about. I.e. I think I’m right. I, who has had one semester of US Constitutions and another of Gov and Econ, feel like I am ready to pave the way to a new outcome of presidential elections.

Just like every other child of my self-gratifying mindset, I sat down at my computer, and made a petition. “‘Not My President’: End the Unfair Electoral College's Power!”: a petition by Lauren Memery- the link is down below.

Here’s the kicker, I may believe that I’m changing the world with my single-signitured petition (signed by yours truly), but I completely missed the “listen to the other side to understand, not respond,” Or in my case- react.

So, with myself becoming “all ears”, I metaphorically “heard out” the pro-Electoral College side by once again… sitting at my computer, but this time to educate myself, like my original intention.

Let the record show that the Electoral College was established back in the drafting up of the Constitution out of fear of the budding democracy becoming a destructive tyranny. It was made as a back-up on the off chance that the country is blinded in a mob mentality of support or rejection towards candidates (Hey 2017, the Founding Fathers want their election outcome back).

They feared violence and unrest would break out to sway opposing voters to a certain side. Unrest surely continues from differing stances on candidates, but violence isn’t a common worry within election season.

With its original purpose slighted, the process of having state representatives double check who will be America’s next POTUS does however attempt fair voting by giving unfair power to less populated states. Once again, the few determine the decisions of the many. This is supposed to save the opinions of the Midwest, but if it’s at the cost of the many people living at the Coasts than how is that fair?

Finally, there is the rule that an elector can oppose the choice of their state and become none other than a non-representing representative.

My intent of understanding the opposition’s stance sadly only solidified my own. I really did try to understand, but the only understanding made was my understanding of how unnecessary this all is. These rules, put in place by those afraid of a hypothetical, tangibly oppress and ignore the literal and current inhabitants of this United States.

So, I made a petition. Maybe a little self-gratifying liberal agenda can change the world, even if our own mind-sets don’t.

Sign here to support the disbanding of the Electoral College:

Cover Image Credit: Pexels

Popular Right Now

This Is How Your Same-Sex Marriage Affects Me As A Catholic Woman

I hear you over there, Bible Bob.

It won't.

Wait, what?

I promise you did read that right. Not what you were expecting me to say, right? Who another person decides to marry will never in any way affect my own marriage whatsoever. Unless they try to marry the person that I want to, then we might have a few problems.

As a kid, I was raised, baptized, and confirmed into an old school Irish Catholic church in the middle of a small, midwestern town.

Not exactly a place that most people would consider to be very liberal or open-minded. Despite this I was taught to love and accept others as a child, to not cast judgment because the only person fit to judge was God. I learned this from my Grandpa, a man whose love of others was only rivaled by his love of sweets and spoiling his grandkids.

While I learned this at an early age, not everyone else in my hometown — or even within my own church — seemed to get the memo. When same-sex marriage was finally legalized country-wide, I cried tears of joy for some of my closest friends who happen to be members of the LGBTQ community.

I was happy while others I knew were disgusted and even enraged.

"That's not what it says in the bible! Marriage is between a man and a woman!"

"God made Adam and Eve for a reason! Man shall not lie with another man as he would a woman!"

"Homosexuality is a sin! It's bad enough that they're all going to hell, now we're letting them marry?"

Alright, Bible Bob, we get it, you don't agree with same-sex relationships. Honestly, that's not the issue. One of our civil liberties as United States citizens is the freedom of religion. If you believe your religion doesn't support homosexuality that's OK.

What isn't OK is thinking that your religious beliefs should dictate others lives.

What isn't OK is using your religion or your beliefs to take away rights from those who chose to live their life differently than you.

Some members of my church are still convinced that their marriage now means less because people are free to marry whoever they want to. Honestly, I wish I was kidding. Tell me again, Brenda how exactly do Steve and Jason's marriage affect yours and Tom's?

It doesn't. Really, it doesn't affect you at all.

Unless Tom suddenly starts having an affair with Steve their marriage has zero effect on you. You never know Brenda, you and Jason might become best friends by the end of the divorce. (And in that case, Brenda and Tom both need to go to church considering the bible also teaches against adultery and divorce.)

I'll say it one more time for the people in the back: same-sex marriage does not affect you even if you or your religion does not support it. If you don't agree with same-sex marriage then do not marry someone of the same sex. Really, it's a simple concept.

It amazes me that I still actually have to discuss this with some people in 2017. And it amazes me that people use God as a reason to hinder the lives of others.

As a proud young Catholic woman, I wholeheartedly support the LGBTQ community with my entire being.

My God taught me to not hold hate so close to my heart. He told me not to judge and to accept others with open arms. My God taught me to love and I hope yours teaches you the same.

Disclaimer - This article in no way is meant to be an insult to the Bible or religion or the LGBTQ community.

Cover Image Credit: Sushiesque / Flickr

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Abortion Should Be A Woman's Right To Choose

You shouldn't take away someone's right to choose just because you don't believe in abortion.


Abortion, a taboo topic most everywhere and quite a controversial one here in America. In my personal opinion abortion should always be allowed when the fetus is not viable outside the mother. According to record a fetus has not been known to survive any earlier than 21 weeks when including the rare case of Lyla Stensrud. Fetuses at that time are not alive because they cannot survive outside their mother. After this alloted amount of time abortions should only be allowed for these two types of pregnancies. Pregnancies that are life threatening to the mother, because she is not required to give up her own right to life to allow another to live. And, pregnancies where the baby will not survive because birthing a stillborn is mentally damaging to the mother and causes physical trauma that could have been avoided. Allowing abortions will help reduce the number of children who wind up in the system because they were parented by people who did not want children. It will decrease the number of minors who are mothers with no high school degree. It will prevent rape victims from having a traumatizing reminder of what happened to them. It will give options to women who took precautions, but fell into the low percent that get pregnant even with their efforts to avoid it. When abortion is illegal it does not stop women from having abortions. Women will use coathangers, hit themselves in the stomach, ingest toxins, or do many other dangerous things to terminate a pregnancy. Making abortion illegal will only stop safe abortions not abortion completely.

Related Content

Facebook Comments