Communication is important. Using Gaga GIFs for that communication is even more important. No worries-- there are more than enough to accurately express just how you feel.
Popular Right Now
Something happened today that I never thought in a million years would happen. I opened up a drawer at my parents' house and I found my pink, 4th generation iPod Nano. I had not seen this thing since I graduated from the 8th grade, and the headphones have not left my ears since I pulled it out of that drawer. It's funny to me how music can take you back. You listen to a song and suddenly you're wearing a pair of gauchos, sitting on the bleachers in a gym somewhere, avoiding boys at all cost at your seventh grade dance. So if you were around in 2007 and feel like reminiscing, here is a playlist straight from the iPod of a middle schooler in 2007.
1. "Bad Day" — Daniel Powter
2. "Hips Don't Lie" — Shakira ft. Wyclef Jean
3. "Unwritten" — Natasha Bedingfield
4. "Run It!" — Chris Brown
5. "Girlfriend" — Avril Lavigne
6. "Move Along" — All-American Rejects
7. "Fergalicious" — Fergie
8. "Every Time We Touch" — Cascada
9. "Ms. New Booty" — Bubba Sparxxx
10. "Chain Hang Low" — Jibbs
11. "Smack That" — Akon ft. Eminem
12. "Waiting on the World to Change" — John Mayer
13. "Stupid Girls" — Pink
14. "Irreplaceable" — Beyonce
15. "Umbrella" — Rihanna ft. Jay-Z
16. "Don't Matter" — Akon
17. "Party Like A Rockstar" — Shop Boyz
18. "This Is Why I'm Hot" — Mims
19. "Beautiful Girls" — Sean Kingston
20. "Bartender" — T-Pain
21. "Pop, Lock and Drop It" — Huey
22. "Wait For You" — Elliot Yamin
23. "Lips Of An Angel" — Hinder
24. "Face Down" — Red Jumpsuit Apparatus
25. "Chasing Cars" — Snow Patrol
26. "No One" — Alicia Keys
27. "Cyclone" — Baby Bash ft. T-Pain
28. "Crank That" — Soulja Boy
29. "Kiss Kiss" — Chris Brown
30. "Lip Gloss" — Lil' Mama
With the AP exams in May approaching quickly, my AP Environmental Science class has wasted no time in jumping right into labs. To demonstrate the damage to the environment done by strip mining, we were instructed to remove the chocolate chips from cookies.
The experiment in itself was rather simple. We profited from fully or partially extracted chips ($8 for a full piece and $4 for a partial) and lost from buying tools, using time and area and incurring fines.
This might seem simplistic, but it showcased the nature of disastrous fossil fuel companies.
We were fined a $1 per minute we spent mining. It cost $4 per tool we bought (either tweezers or paper clips) and 50 cents for every square centimeter of cookie we mined.
Despite the seemingly overbearing charges compared to the sole way to profit, it was actually really easy to profit.
If we found even a partial chocolate chip per minute, that's $3 profit or utilization elsewhere. Tools were an investment that could be made up each with a partial chip, and clearly we were able to find much, much more than just one partial chip per tool.
Perhaps the most disproportionally easiest thing to get around were the fines. We were liable to be fined for habitat destruction, dangerous mining conditions with faulty tools, clutter, mess and noise level. No one in the class got fined for noise level nor faulty tools, but we got hit with habitat destruction and clutter, both of which added up to a mere $6.
We managed to avoid higher fines by deceiving our teacher by pushing together the broken cookie landscapes and swiping away the majority of our mess before being examined for fining purposes. This was amidst all of our cookies being broken into at least three portions.
After finding many, many chips, despite the costs of mining, we profited over $100. We earned a Franklin for destroying our sugary environment.
We weren't even the worst group.
It was kind of funny the situations other groups simulated to their cookies. We were meant to represent strip mining, but one group decided to represent mountaintop removal. Mountaintop removal is where companies go to extract resources from the tops of mountains via explosions to literally blow the tops off. This group did this by literally pulverizing their cookies to bits and pieces with their fists.
They incurred the maximum fine of $45. They didn't profit $100, however.
They profited over $500 dollars.
In the context of our environmental science class, these situations were anywhere from funny to satisfying. In the context of the real world, however, the consequences are devastating our environment.
Without even mentioning the current trajectory we're on approaching a near irreversible global temperature increase even if we took drastic measures this moment, mining and fracking is literally destroying ecosystems.
We think of earthquakes as creating mass amounts of sudden movement and unholy deep trenches as they fracture our crust. With dangerous mining habits, we do this ourselves.
Bigger companies not even related to mining end up destroying the planet and even hundreds of thousands of lives. ExxonMobil, BP? Still thriving in business after serial oil spills over the course of their operation. Purdue Pharma, the company who has misled the medical community for decades about the effects of OxyContin and its potential for abuse, is still running and ruining multitudes more lives every single day.
Did these companies receive fines? Yes.
But their business model is too profitable to make the fines have just about any effect upon their operation.
In our cookie mining simulation, we found that completely obliterating the landscape was much more profitable than being careful and walking on eggshells around the laws. Large, too-big-to-fail companies have held the future of our planet in their greedy paws and have likewise pulverized our environment, soon enough to be unable to return from.