The Importance Of Being Politically Correct
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

The Importance Of Being Politically Correct

Even though it seems excessive, being politically correct may actually benefit our society.

The Importance Of Being Politically Correct
Rhode Island American Civil Liberties Union

Over the past several years, as social movements advocating for equality for racial, ethnic and sexual minorities have gained momentum, there has been an increasing trend in American society to use politically correct language. The term "politically correct" is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as "agreeing with the idea that people should be careful to not use language or behave in a way that could offend a particular group of people." This often takes the form of individuals correcting those who use "offensive" terms and nit-picking semantics, resulting in political correctness frequently being viewed in a negative light. There are multiple reasons people cite for opposing political correctness, but possibly the most common is that using politically correct language adversely impacts freedom of speech. This is a fairly logical argument; after all, one of the fundamental human rights we hold as American citizens is the right to freely express our opinions, whether by word-of-mouth or through the press.

Nonetheless, freedom of speech goes both ways: if we have the right to speak our minds in ways that may be considered harsh or insensitive, we also have the right to correct and try to educate those who use speech that could be construed as offensive. Understandably, constant correcting of one's choice of language, which is the form political correctness often takes, can be irritating, especially when it seems to be simply a matter of semantics. But if one is given guidance about how to be more sensitive, it should not be blown off. In such a situation, it is important to put oneself in the shoes of the person who might be offended and try to view the language in question from that perspective.

For example, think about the distinction between the words "tranny," "trans-gendered," or "transgender" to describe someone who does not identity with the gender he/she was assigned at birth. Clearly, "tranny" is an offensive term; anyone who uses it likely does not care if anyone is offended by the use of this word, or may even be trying to be intentionally derogatory. In such an instance, this language is used to intentionally deride the transgender population. Moreover, someone who is simply uneducated about the transgender population and unaware of what may be considered offensive may use the term "trans-gendered" to describe a gender non-conforming individual. On the surface, this term appears to be harmless, however, many transgender individuals dislike being referred to in this way. As described by Christina DiEdoardo, a transgender woman, use of this word makes it seem like "something has been done to us" and implies a distinct, completed choice to be transgender, rather than the reality of the long process of coming to terms with one's identity. Of course, this distinction between "trans-gendered" and "transgender" is incredibly subtle and impossible to pick up on unless one is educated about the difference.

This example illustrates not only the nuances of using politically correct language, but the reasons why people are often insensitive. As is the case with the use of the word "tranny," some people use politically incorrect language to intentionally ridicule a certain population. Unfortunately, not much can be done to correct offensive language with this type of malicious motivation. On the other hand, some people use politically incorrect language out of sheer ignorance. This is not a bad thing—after all, one cannot be blamed for simply not knowing the correct language to use in a given situation. This is the case with the word "trans-gendered": It seems harmless on the surface, yet carries greater weight for individuals in this population. In such an occasion where inexperience is the predecessor to using insensitive language, it is necessary to make people aware of the appropriate vocabulary. Otherwise, ignorance will continue to breed intolerance.

You may think, "people just need to learn to be less sensitive". But the fact is, if you belonged to a group of people who have constantly been discriminated against, you would be sensitive too. It is frequently the case that people belonging to any majority, whether it be racial, ethnic, gender, or sexuality based, are not aware of the systemic discrimination minorities face. In the end, only people belonging to these minorities can truly understand the experiences they go through and the effects certain language has on their sense of self. We can attempt to empathize, but we will never know the trials these populations face. It is for that reason the movement to be politically correct is a positive one. Even if it feels like being hypercritical, we must remember we can never truly understand the effects insensitive words have on others unless we belong to the minority group in question.

Ultimately, people should be politically correct not to be in line with the liberal ideology, but simply out of sheer human decency. It should be a common practice to treat others with respect, even if it requires slightly more effort than allowing one's speech to remain unfiltered. This is not to say we should hide our opinions; expressing opinions is still a vital part of exercising freedom of speech. But when expressing one's opinions, it is important to be open to the idea that new things can always be learned. Instead of getting defensive when corrected for unknowingly using insensitive language, look at is as room to grow. After all, nobody is perfect. We all are naive on certain subjects, but if we take the advice of others and create a more politically correct atmosphere, we can not only become a more informed society but also take a step toward equality for all.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments