Going Viral: The Easy Allure Of Sexy Science
Start writing a post
Student Life

Going Viral: The Easy Allure Of Sexy Science

Don't believe, or share, everything you read on the internet.

24
Going Viral: The Easy Allure Of Sexy Science
Singapore Science Center/Michael Bartalos

Many of you have probably seen some variation of the headline “Scientists say intelligence is inherited from mothers” in your newsfeeds recently. On behalf of actual scientists everywhere, I apologize. A cursory Google search points to one of the top hits being an article from The Independent, which includes a 30-second montage of alternating famous TV moms and blundering male idiots. In between Lorelai Gilmore, Lucille Bluth, Cersei Lannister, and other prime examples of motherhood, there are flashes of text claiming “Intelligence genes are carried on the X chromosome” and “Women have two… Men have only one.” That’s right, boys - that means you’re one plus one equals twice as stupid. If you go on to read the rest of the article, you’ll find the single actual reference points to a blog called Psychology Spot. While it is commendable that they bothered citing anything at all, I don’t think I have to restate the absurdity of relying on a blog post to shore up a scientific claim.

A laughably incorrect representation of DNA and chromosomes. © nobeastsofierce/shutterstock.com

Without going into too much detail on all the different ways the article fails to make any logical sense, I’ll highlight the points which I found most offensive. First of all, the article seems to be laboring under the impression that there are such things called “intelligence genes,” which are supposedly found on the X-chromosome. Intelligence isn’t some discrete quality that is governed by a specific set of genes in a single chromosome. It is insanely complicated and abstract, and probably dependent on a huge number of factors like genetics, environment, upbringing, diet, education, etc. And genetics is complicated too. No single gene confers one concrete quality over another; rather, the concerted interactions of multiple gene products spanning multiple chromosomes give rise to phenotypes. The presence of two X-chromosomes also does not add up to twice the gene dosage—in females the cell actually compensates for having two copies of X-chromosome genes by silencing one chromosome1. In men, the gene expression on the single X-chromosome is up-regulated. Let’s also not forget about the phenomenon of “crossing-over,”2 which you learned about in freshman biology. During fertilization of the female egg, chromosomes from both parents line up and exchange genetic information, resulting in the offspring to have chromosomes that are a mix of gene variants from both parents. So X-chromosomes aren’t passed down intact from mother to child — dad contributes too. Ultimately what it boils down to is this: there’s no scientific basis for the claim that mothers are solely responsible for the intelligence of their children. However, it is perfectly reasonable to say that contributions to parenting can be unequal. If a child is raised primarily by the mother, obviously her role will be more important in the cognitive development of the child. Taking that into consideration, it is of no surprise that mothers with high IQ will also raise children with higher intelligence, all that messy genetics aside.

Crossing over.

The fact of the matter is that both intelligence and genetics are complex subjects of study, and what we do know is probably far less compared to what we don’t yet know. The saddest part of this entire pile of rubbish is the fact this article, and many others that cite it, have gone viral. Catchy headlines like “New Research Establishes Inheritance Is Inherited From The Mother” and “Intelligence Inherited From Mother: Your Mother Was Right All Along” invade social media far too easily with little thought given to the content. This seems to be a prevailing trend in popular media, where it’s more valuable to come up with something that will ramp up page views instead of providing any new or accurate information. I’ll draw your attention to the recently aired "What On Earth” segment on the Science Channel that claimed the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle was solved. It supposedly involves a very theatrical phenomenon called an “air bomb.” Sounds epic, right? But is it accurate? No. Even the meteorologist interviewed in the segment later spoke to the Washington Post and said “The editing on this was horrendous… I was really upset when I saw this.” Rather than accurately represent what the meteorologist (Randall Cerveny) was really saying, “Science” Channel instead chose to edit the segment to make it more sensational and cool.

19 pictures of cat allergies fare better than an article on how to better parent autistic children. © Buzzfeed Science

One of my favorite Last Week Tonight segments, found here, is when John Oliver crushed the news media for portraying scientific studies misleadingly. I highly recommend a watch. Then again, perhaps the problem lies less with media outlets and more with content consumers, i.e. us. People will voraciously consume content that’s dramatic and sexy, or fits an already popular agenda, whether the science behind it is factual or not. Or perhaps it’s more cyclical, and both content creators and consumers are to blame. While I 100% support open access to science and do appreciate the tendency that people are now better able to read new research, there needs to be more accountability in what information is being presented. Whether that accountability rests with ourselves, so that we fact- and source-check information provided to us, or with the media themselves to do a better job. But until we achieve that utopic balance, exercise caution when you encounter the next new viral news story about science. As a general rule, if you don’t understand it, don’t share it, even if it sounds sexy and you’re only trying to get some likes.

References:

  1. Brockdorff, N., & Turner, B. M. (2015). Dosage Compensation in Mammals. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 491–521. http://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019398.
  2. Griffiths, A. J. F., Gelbart W. M., Miller J. H., et al. Modern Genetic Analysis. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1999. Crossing-Over. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21383/.
Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Waitlisted for a College Class? Here's What to Do!

Dealing with the inevitable realities of college life.

59065
college students waiting in a long line in the hallway
StableDiffusion

Course registration at college can be a big hassle and is almost never talked about. Classes you want to take fill up before you get a chance to register. You might change your mind about a class you want to take and must struggle to find another class to fit in the same time period. You also have to make sure no classes clash by time. Like I said, it's a big hassle.

This semester, I was waitlisted for two classes. Most people in this situation, especially first years, freak out because they don't know what to do. Here is what you should do when this happens.

Keep Reading...Show less
a man and a woman sitting on the beach in front of the sunset

Whether you met your new love interest online, through mutual friends, or another way entirely, you'll definitely want to know what you're getting into. I mean, really, what's the point in entering a relationship with someone if you don't know whether or not you're compatible on a very basic level?

Consider these 21 questions to ask in the talking stage when getting to know that new guy or girl you just started talking to:

Keep Reading...Show less
Lifestyle

Challah vs. Easter Bread: A Delicious Dilemma

Is there really such a difference in Challah bread or Easter Bread?

38142
loaves of challah and easter bread stacked up aside each other, an abundance of food in baskets
StableDiffusion

Ever since I could remember, it was a treat to receive Easter Bread made by my grandmother. We would only have it once a year and the wait was excruciating. Now that my grandmother has gotten older, she has stopped baking a lot of her recipes that require a lot of hand usage--her traditional Italian baking means no machines. So for the past few years, I have missed enjoying my Easter Bread.

Keep Reading...Show less
Adulting

Unlocking Lake People's Secrets: 15 Must-Knows!

There's no other place you'd rather be in the summer.

959632
Group of joyful friends sitting in a boat
Haley Harvey

The people that spend their summers at the lake are a unique group of people.

Whether you grew up going to the lake, have only recently started going, or have only been once or twice, you know it takes a certain kind of person to be a lake person. To the long-time lake people, the lake holds a special place in your heart, no matter how dirty the water may look.

Keep Reading...Show less
Student Life

Top 10 Reasons My School Rocks!

Why I Chose a Small School Over a Big University.

196555
man in black long sleeve shirt and black pants walking on white concrete pathway

I was asked so many times why I wanted to go to a small school when a big university is so much better. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure a big university is great but I absolutely love going to a small school. I know that I miss out on big sporting events and having people actually know where it is. I can't even count how many times I've been asked where it is and I know they won't know so I just say "somewhere in the middle of Wisconsin." But, I get to know most people at my school and I know my professors very well. Not to mention, being able to walk to the other side of campus in 5 minutes at a casual walking pace. I am so happy I made the decision to go to school where I did. I love my school and these are just a few reasons why.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments