I see you smiling as you walk through the halls in your perfect sweater, trendy pants and boots. You walk with your head high, greeting those who come across your path. You are on your way to chapel because you need to be at a minimum of 18 of them by the end of the semester, but you will probably go to more. I can tell you are trying to help everyone with everything, no matter what it takes. You stay up late to finish the mounds of homework your seven classes have assigned you because you spent the day helping other people. I see your smile, though. I see how hard you are trying. There isn’t a single break in your day to even sit down for lunch. I don’t know how you do it. You are perfect. The perfect student, friend, daughter, sister and employee. You strive for perfection in everything. But here’s the thing. You were not created to be perfect. I know, it’s hard to believe. If we were made to follow in Christ’s footsteps and he was perfect, shouldn’t we also strive for perfection? Well, the answer is tricky. You were not created for perfection. You were created to fall down, get hurt and fall short. Within these failures, you are giving God the chance to come into your life and put his own perfection on display. This does not mean you shouldn’t try, it just means it’s okay to fail. I know you have heard the verse that tells us how we all fall short of God’s glory; you’ve probably heard it so much it’s become. I’m here to tell you it’s okay to say no to people, to be a little selfish with your time, to take care of you as long as you are still giving it all to God. This is my letter to you, the person who is tired of trying to be perfect. You cannot be perfect. If you believe you are perfect, where is your need for God? I see the smile that doesn’t quite reach your eyes, the sweaters you wear because they are easy to throw on in the morning and still look professional. I see the light left on in your room because you fell asleep studying again. I see the coffee you carry because you were too stressed to sleep. I see your heart and the good intentions you have. I see the smile you want to reach your eyes, but just can’t because of the exhaustion. I see you. I know you. I am you.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Student Life![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
