Being nice is not that hard. It seriously isn't hard at all. I have learned in my years that being nice truly pays off in the end. It really does. People will remember when you have been nice to them, and it could really brighten someone's day. Being nice to someone could make or break their day and sometimes people really might need it. A smile or a compliment could really send someone over the moon with happiness. I believe that being kind really can improve someone else's day as well as yours. When you exude positive vibes, more than likely positive vibes will come back to you. It is very easy to be a nice person, and it doesn't cost you anything. Literally nothing. Kind looks and compliments are free. For example, if someone is having a bad day, one nice thing you say could turn their day around. Some of my best friendships have came from just being nice and attracting the people I love to be around. I promise that purpose will remember the kindness that you pass on. Being positive and having high energy are qualities that are often missing in some people. I don't believe that anyone should live out their days in misery. It isn't healthy and life is awful if you live that way. Even if you have a bad day, don't take it out on other people! If your day has been horrible, it is not a stranger's fault. If you woke up and the day started off bad, do not take it out on other people. Everything happens for a reason. It really does. Every event that occurs happens because it is suppose to happen. You can control the outcome of some events, though.What I mean by this is something simple--don't be rude to someone just because your day was bad. It isn't nice to take out hard feelings on someone else.No one deserves to suffer for something bad that happened to you. I believe this is where patience comes into play, and realizing that not everything is going to work out in your favor all the time. I make it a point to be kind and try to make others happy. Of course, even I have bad days but I try to not let that affect how I interact with other people. Just because I'm not having the best day doesn't mean I shouldn't try to make others have the best day possible. It is so easy to be nice to someone and it feels awesome when you make someone smile. Being kind to someone can be something as simple as complimenting their outfit, or something as huge as buying them a present they have wanted for a while. It doesn't matter what you do so long as you try and be the best version of yourself everyday. So really-- be kind and pass it on, you never know who might need it.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Student Life![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
