What Worries Me About The Black Lives Matter Movement

What Worries Me About The Black Lives Matter Movement

Do black lives matter universally or conditionally?

On a sunny, humid Tuesday afternoon I picked up the weekly issue of City Paper, one of Baltimore's free publications. I love this paper. It covers such a broad range of perspectives and writing styles. Reading through it makes me proud to be the beautiful, intellectual Baltimorean I am.

But there's a particular grim, bitter section of the paper that is so consistently grim that after a few consecutive reads, one is left numb. The "Murder Ink" segment covers murders in Baltimore weekly. I skim over it most times, because reading through it copiously, to me, is pointless. Well, this week I chose to read the page entirely. It consists of brief accounts of murders, often a result of gun shot wounds. Every victim was an African American male under the age of 35. Every. single. one. Now, I do not think these brief news reports on violence in Baltimore would be any more unfortunate or make an interesting read if the victims were another race or gender. It would still send a dark cloud over my spirit, moving me to wonder, "Why is there so much violence in our city?"

I ponder even further, "Why is there so much violence among black males?" A few weeks ago, Baltimore native rapper, Lor Scoota, was killed after leaving a peace rally in Baltimore city. He was shot multiple times through his car. And last week, one of his business partners was gunned down in from of his home.

After seeing in our national news more unfortunate, disgusting events that have happened involving violence against black men, I must now take a closer look at black lives and examine when they matter and when they do not.

Yes, it is apparent, to me, that black lives matter conditionally or only in certain situations. Over the past week, two incidents involving black men and a white police officers have made national news. According to available footage, the victims — black men — were killed unlawfully. We've seen these types of cases before. Cases where white law enforcement use what many claim as "excess force" and the perpetrator ends up dead.

I've seen it, and I am tired, and numb, and mentally weak. I do not want to take sides, because when I do, it hurts. Both sides; it's filled with frustration, confusion, and rage. Which sides am I referring to you ask? Well, there's the blue side (for cops) and the black side (for supporters of human equality). Somewhere, for some people, the two may collide. I think I am one of those people. I stand smack in the middle of the blue and the black. Unfortunately, too often, blue is seen as bad to the black and black is seen as bad to the blue.

So when and where do we place value for these groups? Can we always respect police for serving and protecting communities? Do we place value on blacks lives universally?

I can't say we do enough of both. It's like some type of flighty, on and off again relationship where both parties are only all in when it is beneficial or comfortable.

Have we gotten too comfortable with black on black murders? So comfortable that we only see the value of black lives when law enforcement or a non black has taken it away.

Are we now comfortable with furthering violence, taking the lives of police officers because of their career choice and association?

What is the Black Lives Matter movement? I need to know because I don't feel it, I don't see it in black communities. I only see it and hear it as a reactive measure.

I need to know because I am tired, and numb, and tired.

Cover Image Credit: www.renegadetribune.com

Popular Right Now

I'm The Girl Without A 'Friend Group'

And here's why I'm OK with it


Little things remind me all the time.

For example, I'll be sitting in the lounge with the people on my floor, just talking about how everyone's days went. Someone will turn to someone else and ask something along the lines of, "When are we going to so-and-so's place tonight?" Sometimes it'll even be, "Are you ready to go to so-and-so's place now? Okay, we'll see you later, Taylor!"

It's little things like that, little things that remind me I don't have a "friend group." And it's been like that forever. I don't have the same people to keep me company 24 hours of the day, the same people to do absolutely everything with, and the same people to cling to like glue. I don't have a whole cast of characters to entertain me and care for me and support me. Sometimes, especially when it feels obvious to me, not having a "friend group" makes me feel like a waste of space. If I don't have more friends than I can count, what's the point in trying to make friends at all?

I can tell you that there is a point. As a matter of fact, just because I don't have a close-knit clique doesn't mean I don't have any friends. The friends I have come from all different walks of life, some are from my town back home and some are from across the country. I've known some of my friends for years, and others I've only known for a few months. It doesn't really matter where they come from, though. What matters is that the friends I have all entertain me, care for me, and support me. Just because I'm not in that "friend group" with all of them together doesn't mean that we can't be friends to each other.

Still, I hate avoiding sticking myself in a box, and I'm not afraid to seek out friendships. I've noticed that a lot of the people I see who consider themselves to be in a "friend group" don't really venture outside the pack very often. I've never had a pack to venture outside of, so I don't mind reaching out to new people whenever.

I'm not going to lie, when I hear people talking about all the fun they're going to have with their "friend group" over the weekend, part of me wishes I could be included in something like that. I do sometimes want to have the personality type that allows me to mesh perfectly into a clique. I couldn't tell you what it is about me, but there is some part of me that just happens to function better one-on-one with people.

I hated it all my life up until very recently, and that's because I've finally learned that not having a "friend group" is never going to be the same as not having friends.

SEE ALSO: To The Girls Who Float Between Friend Groups

Cover Image Credit: wordpress.com

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Abortion Bans Are Only A Small Part Of The Republican War On Women

These bans expose the Republican Party for what it truly is.


This week, several states passed laws that ban abortion after six to eight weeks of pregnancy, before most women even know that they're pregnant. The most egregious of these is Alabama — the state has banned abortion except for in cases of danger to the mother. Exceptions in the cases of rape and incest were actively voted against by the state legislature. Under the new law, any doctor who is caught giving an abortion would be sentenced to 99 years in prison, and the woman would be charged with murder.

Apart from the fact that this explicitly violates the decision of Roe v. Wade (which is the point), this is only a small part of the slow but steady degradation of women's rights by Republicans in the United States. To anyone who believes that this is simply about people being "pro-life" or "saving the children," then tell them to look at what happens after the fetus is carried to term.

Republicans oppose forcing fathers to be involved in the lives of their children that were forcibly carried to term, desires to cut food stamps and make it more difficult to feed said child, cut funding for affordable housing to make it more difficult for them to find homes, cut spending to public education so these children can't move up the social ladder, and refuse to offer the woman or her child health insurance to keep them both healthy. What about efforts to prevent pregnancy? Republicans also oppose funding birth control and contraception, as well as opposing comprehensive sexual education. To them, the only feasible solution is to simply keep your legs shut. They oppose all of these things because it is, in their eyes, a violation of individual rights to force people to do something. The bill also makes women who get abortions felons, and felons can't vote. I'll let you finish putting those two together.

If you view it from this framework, it would seem like Republicans are being extremely hypocritical by violating the personal freedoms of pregnant women, but if you look at it from the view of restricting social mobility for women, then it makes perfect sense. The Republican dogma of "individual rights" and "personal responsibility" is a socially acceptable facade that they use to cover up their true intentions of protecting the status quo and protect those in power. About any Republican policy, ask yourself: does this disperse power or consolidate it? Whether it be education, healthcare, the environment, or the economy, Republicans love to keep power away from the average citizen and give it to the small number of people that they deem "deserving" of it because of their race, gender, wealth, or power. This is the case with abortion as well; Power is being taken from women, and being given back to men in a reversal of the Feminist Movement of the 1970s.

Republicans don't believe in systemic issues. They believe that everyone has the same opportunity to succeed regardless of what point they started. This is why they love capitalism so much. It acts as some sort of great filter in which only those who deserve power can make it to the top. It's also why they hate social policies; they think that helping people who can't help themselves changes the hierarchy in a negative way by giving people who don't "deserve" power, power. Of course, we know that just because you have money and power doesn't mean you earned it fair and square, and even if Republicans believe it, it wouldn't change anything because it wouldn't change how they want to distribute power.

In short, Republican policies, including abortion, leave the average American with less money, less protection, less education, worse health, less opportunity, fewer rights, and less freedom. This is NOT a side effect. This is the point. Regardless of what Republicans will tell you about "inalienable rights" and how everyone is equal, in reality, they believe that some people and groups are more deserving of rights than others, and the group that deserves rights the most are the ones "that will do the best with them." To Republicans, this group consists of the wealthy, the powerful, and the white — the mega-rich, the CEOs of large companies, gun owners and Christians.

So, who do Republicans think deserve power and give it to? People who look and think like them. This, however, begs the question: Who do they want to take it from?

Related Content

Facebook Comments