Let’s face it… whether we want to say that the first thing we notice in a guy is his “gorgeous eyes” or “stunning smile” or his ‘dazzling personality,” we all know that is not true. The first thing you see when a guy walks up to you or right past you is his clothing. A well-dressed guy can make all the difference…sure the teeth, eyes, and overall personality must be a match too but first glance is what grabs your attention. A guy who cares about his appearance has a leg up in the race from the start. Clothes can portray so much about a person but they especially exude confidence and a dynamic personality. You can basically tell everything about a guy by the clothes he wears and if you can’t, you’re probably just not looking hard enough. We all want to believe that we will not judge a book by its cover but it’s human nature. We react to the first thing we see on a guy and make an immediate judgement. So basically if the guy isn’t wearing the right thing, our minds are virtually made up pretty quickly. Don’t get me wrong, a guy in a lazy outfit of sweatpants and a plain t-shirt can be very attractive but nothing beats a guy in a suit. Maybe a suit is too much for a first appearance but jeans/khakis with converse and a nice button down shirt speak volumes. Since most girls usually place way too much effort into what they wear it is always a nice sighting to see a guy who cares half as much. Now most of the time girls could care less what a guy thought of what she was wearing because she does it for herself but, NOTHING beats a well-dressed couple. And any girl wants to be part of that "power-dressed" couple. Confidence is key in any form but in the form of clothing it is so powerful. Clothing is an art and if a guy truly understands that, you can learn a lot about him. The idea of being able to trust a guy’s opinion on clothing is something most girls would love to be able to rely on but that is a rarity. You gotta get a guy who can be a master at both types…a guy who can be the lazy, sporty looking carefree type and then switch to the respectable, clean cut type. I have found that guys who step out of the norm and care about their appearance more than most tend to be more confidant and outgoing. Girls are attracted to a guy who looks well put together and knows that what he’s got is good. So to the guy who doesn’t really care about his clothes or what he wears to his 8am class, start caring because there is always someone watching. But most importantly, to the guy who puts in the effort not just for the girls but for himself, thank you. You make the 8 am classes more bearable and the love of fashion sightings so much more exciting.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Lifestyle![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
