The Bible states "Pride goes before destruction" in Proverbs 16:18 but have you ever related that to your own life? Have you ever found yourself in a situation to which you thought you were better than anyone else in that general task, or even just in general? I know that I have and still do. It's natural for us, as humans, to feel this way from time to time; not that it makes it okay to feel this way. In fact Solomon says "Pride brings a man low, but the lowly in spirit gain honor" in Proverbs 29:23. It's probably important to note that Solomon was the King of Judah from 970 BC till 930 BC. Solomon was also a man of the Lord who feared God, not in the negative view of the word but rather in the way which means he acknowledged God was supreme and respected him. Solomon warned us about becoming prideful because he knew that our pride can lead us not only into a false sense of confidence but also to be arrogant. For example; I walk into French class thinking to myself "I have taken French before nobody is going to understand the teacher better then me." That would be incredibly arrogant of me to think, would it not? Obviously, I do not know if anyone else in the class has previously taken French or is of French heritage but I had already pre-determined that I was the best. Another example would be if someone had never lost a fight in their life decided to go toe-to-toe with the number one boxer of all time only to find that they are not the best fighter in the world and, surprise, more then likely found theirself losing the fight. My point is that if we allow ourselves to become prideful, not only do we tend to make more heinous decisions we also forget to exalt God and see his glory in our situation. Every talent we posses is a gift from our Father and we should use that gift to glorify him and not ourselves. There would be no need for me to learn French if I was only going to speak French in veiled attempts to sleep with more women however, if I learn French to a point that I am able to hold a decent conversation with someone and take the opportunity to teach them about God not only am I serving my Father but I am stewarding his gift. Someone is confused now. Yes, I said that my ability to learn French was a gift from God. It's not a gift in the terms of I was supernaturally able to know French but a gift in the terms of I was provided the opportunity, time, patience and ability to retain the language itself. If we live as if everything we do is a gift from God I bet the world would be a happier and more humbled place. Next time you find yourself swelling with pride remind yourself that "Pride goes before destruction!"
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Lifestyle![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
