"IT" Succeeds in what Remakes are Suppose to Be

"IT" Succeeds in what Remakes are Suppose to Be

Any director debating a remake needs to take note.

Every twenty seven years, Pennywise the dancing clown comes back to terrorize the town of Derry, Maine. In 1990, the miniseries following Stephen King’s novel was released on television and paved way for later TV movie adaptations of not only King’s works, but other miniseries as well. The miniseries of the film piqued my curiosity and I picked up the novel, but never found it in me to finish (this will be semi-relevant later as I go on) and so I do not have that connection, but I do have nostalgia with the original. Hearing about the remake, I had my doubts- it’s not easy remaking a classic- but seeing the trailer, I was hooked, and eagerly awaiting the release.

Now IT is out, and I have never loved a remake more.

It’s no secret that there is a stark difference in portrayals when it comes to the beloved Pennywise, but when it comes to the horror genre it can be tough to compete with past actors. In the last ten years, horror icons such as Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees have been replaced in reboots of classic pieces of horror cinema, and critics were not all welcoming. In 1990, IT the face of Pennywise was none other than Tim Curry, and much like past characters, he made the character iconic. With big clown shoes to fill, the new Pennywise, Bill Skarsgård ( Hemlock Grove ) not only met expectations but exceeded in portraying the Pennywise I had expected when I was much younger.

I first watched IT around the time I was entering kindergarten, and upon first viewing it was not scary nor was it creepy or unnerving. The only part that gravely impacted me and sent some sort of unease through me was the scene where he spoke to the “Lucky Seven” through the book. Other than that, it was a tame movie compared to others. Seeing the trailer for the remake, I was left with expectations I was prepared to drop up until I heard the reviews, and thus to contain my excitement walking through the door.

The shift between Skarsgård and Curry’s performance reminds me of the change between Haley and Englund’s performances, only done well. While Curry delivered a creepy and animated Pennywise, Skarsgård does that as well, and then some. From the voice to the odd shifting eyes, Skarsgård makes Pennywise out to be the clown we all feared in 2016. His mannerisms are quick yet sly, and the line delivery of lines adds animation that the original Pennywise had as well while covering basis that it lacked. It was a good touch, as well, being able to see more of Pennywise in his natural environment (the sewers) because the 1990 miniseries neglected that peak into the underworld, and not curiosity is cured.

It was the best type of scary and creepy- without a lot of gore. IT used anticipation to lure the audiences attention in and makes it impossible to look away out of sheer curiosity, and when it does reach the jump scare, it has that same effect of a haunted house around Halloween time which was the most uncomfortable of them all- because in those, you cant get out until its over. There was one scare in particular which was taken out on Mikey that did this especially, and there was a moment where I felt physically ill watching it, but for all good reasons. This all being said, the best word to describe it would come from a friend that saw it prior and was giving his thoughts- it was uncomfortable as opposed to scary. It had it’s moments, but more so there was something uneasy and sickening about watching the scare scenes that just made my stomach churn.

There were certain aspects that the movie touched on better than the miniseries as well. For instance, in the movie we are able to see more of the children as opposed to taking it for face value. I did not expect to see as much of Beverly, Patrick, or Henry as I had walking into the movie, but was pleasantly surprised with the amount of screentime each of them got. SPOILER: I also thoroughly enjoyed seeing how Pennywise used Henry to his advantage, instead of him simply being the bully. It didn’t feel like we were missing any actors, and everyone had their ending.

With regards to the children as actors, I have to give them praise for their performance and delivery. It is hard not to watch a movie and root for the child to “just go left!”, “don’t open it!”, “Get AWAY from the sink!”, but the cast that played the Losers Club as well as Henry and his gang all reacted in a way that's appropriate and understandable. The humor in the film meshed well and did not feel forced, but among all things to come out of IT, I walked away with not an ounce of second hand embarrassment. Having filmed a child or two for a P.S.A assignment and viewed a couple dozen movies, it comes from my experience that child actors can be hard to work with, and even harder to watch simply due to inexperience or they are just plain awkward. The cast of the Losers Club was done well enough that even the humor was not too off putting. A thanks can also be said to the scriptwriters, who did a fantastic job at appeasing that immature humor of young boys without being too uncomfortable to watch. It all felt realistic which aided towards my sympathy for the characters.

With all this said, is IT the remake better, worse, or about the same as the original miniseries?

The IT remake is a phenomenal horror movie, it is a horror movie that is best watched in theaters or with the lights off with a cuddle buddy, and does achieve the scares that the original lacked. The original is just the- original. It is the classic movie to watch in a marathon, much more tamed but still holds appeal to horror viewers. I would say that the remake is indeed better than the original, but the original serves it’s purpose as a film classic, and so it is still a must watch regardless of if it is scary or not. The two are not equals, but there is room for both in the cinematic world. As I sit here, I sit with the novel at my right hand awaiting for a dent to be made, and it won’t be long until it’s finished.

Cover Image Credit: IT Trailer 2017

Popular Right Now

I Went To "The Bachelor" Auditions

And here's why you won’t be seeing me on TV.

It’s finally time to admit my guilty pleasure: I have always been a huge fan of The Bachelor.

I can readily admit that I’ve been a part of Bachelor fantasy leagues, watch parties, solo watching — you name it, I’ve gone the whole nine yards. While I will admit that the show can be incredibly trashy at times, something about it makes me want to watch it that much more. So when I found out that The Bachelor was holding auditions in Houston, I had to investigate.

While I never had the intention of actually auditioning, there was no way I would miss an opportunity to spend some time people watching and check out the filming location of one of my favorite TV shows.

The casting location of The Bachelor, The Downtown Aquarium in Houston, was less than two blocks away from my office. I assumed that I would easily be able to spot the audition line, secretly hoping that the endless line of people would beg the question: what fish could draw THAT big of a crowd?

As I trekked around the tanks full of aquatic creatures in my bright pink dress and heels (feeling somewhat silly for being in such nice clothes in an aquarium and being really proud of myself for somewhat looking the part), I realized that these auditions would be a lot harder to find than I thought.

Finally, I followed the scent of hairspray leading me up the elevator to the third floor of the aquarium.

The doors slid open. I found myself at the end of a large line of 20-something-year-old men and women and I could feel all eyes on me, their next competitor. I watched as one woman pulled out her travel sized hair curler, someone practiced answering interview questions with a companion, and a man (who was definitely a little too old to be the next bachelor) trying out his own pick-up lines on some of the women standing next to him.

I walked to the end of the line (trying to maintain my nonchalant attitude — I don’t want to find love on a TV show). As I looked around, I realized that one woman had not taken her eyes off of me. She batted her fake eyelashes and looked at her friend, mumbling something about the *grumble mumble* “girl in the pink dress.”

I felt a wave of insecurity as I looked down at my body, immediately beginning to recognize the minor flaws in my appearance.

The string hanging off my dress, the bruise on my ankle, the smudge of mascara I was sure I had on the left corner of my eye. I could feel myself begin to sweat. These women were all so gorgeous. Everyone’s hair was perfectly in place, their eyeliner was done flawlessly, and most of them looked like they had just walked off the runway. Obviously, I stuck out like a sore thumb.

I walked over to the couches and sat down. For someone who for the most part spent most of the two hours each Monday night mocking the cast, I was shocked by how much pressure and tension I felt in the room.

A cop, stationed outside the audition room, looked over at me. After a brief explanation that I was just there to watch, he smiled and offered me a tour around the audition space. I watched the lines of beautiful people walk in and out of the space, realizing that each and every one of these contestants to-be was fixated on their own flaws rather than actually worrying about “love.”

Being with all these people, I can see why it’s so easy to get sucked into the fantasy. Reality TV sells because it’s different than real life. And really, what girl wouldn’t like a rose?

Why was I so intimidated by these people? Reality TV is actually the biggest oxymoron. In real life, one person doesn’t get to call all the shots. Every night isn’t going to be in a helicopter looking over the south of France. A real relationship depends on more than the first impression.

The best part of being in a relationship is the reality. The best part about yourself isn’t your high heels. It’s not the perfect dress or the great pick-up lines. It’s being with the person that you can be real with. While I will always be a fan of The Bachelor franchise, this was a nice dose of reality. I think I’ll stick to my cheap sushi dates and getting caught in the rain.

But for anyone who wants to be on The Bachelor, let me just tell you: Your mom was right. There really are a lot of fish in the sea. Or at least at the aquarium.

Cover Image Credit: The Cut

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

11 Amazing TV Shows That Are Ending in 2019

All good things must come to an end.


It might just be the beginning of 2019 but there are many TV series wrapping up already. There are many breathtaking and original pilots around along with several reboots coming. This might be one of the greatest year for TV.

However, all good things must come to an end. Some series have been planned out and are going to be finished while others have been cut short. Sadly, here's a list of TV series to say goodbye to this year.

1. The Big Bang Theory (CBS)

Final Date: May

12 Seasons//279 episodes

2. Orange is the New Black (Netflix)


Final Date: End of 2019

7 seasons//91 episodes

3. Jane the Virgin (CW)


Final Date: Mid-late 2019

5 seasons//100 episodes

4. Games of Thrones (HBO)


Final Date: Summer

8 Seasons//73 episodes

5. Broad City (Comedy Central)

Comedy Central

Final Date: March

5 seasons//50 episodes



Final Date: Spring

7 seasons//67 episodes

7. Homeland (Showtime)


Final date: Summer

8 seasons//96 episodes

8. Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt (Netflix)

Final date: January 25

4 seasons//52 episodes

9. The Affair (Showtime)


Final Date: End of 2019

5 seasons//42 episodes

10. Friends From College (Netflix)

Final Date: End of 2019

2 seasons//16 episodes

11. Crashing (HBO)


Final Date: End of 2019

3 seasons//24 episodes

Related Content

Facebook Comments