Students on the Subject of Censorship
Start writing a post
Student Life

Students on the Subject of Censorship

Modern day internet protection legislation has harmed our education

48
Students on the Subject of Censorship
Hidester

As students, we have the right to widen our minds. In this modern era of fast technology and faster information, censorship is meant to keep harm out, but is it handicapping our education? The concept of censorship is well founded on the belief that certain age groups are not ready to be exposed to certain material, but where is the line drawn? At what point does protection trump education? Students are losing valuable educational resources due to improperly run internet censorship.

Government agencies have pushed public schools and libraries to inhibit students’ access to important resources through legislation and organizations, such as the CIPA. The Child Internet Protection Act, was enacted in 2000 by congress. It requires censorship from inappropriate content for all schools hoping to receive government discounts on internet related services, through a program called E-rate. According to the Federal Communications Commission, “The protection measures must block or filter Internet access to pictures (material) that are: (a) obscene; (b) child pornography; or (c) harmful to minors (for computers that are accessed by minors),” but what constitutes as harmful to minors and how should the censorship be carried out? This vague phrasing leaves too much up to interpretation.

This ambiguous order has allowed for abuse of the right to internet censorship. For instance, when schools and libraries used filtering programs that block LGBT youth support sites (obviously deviating from the intentions of the CIPA) or the current blocking of popular or social websites (such as Facebook and Youtube) despite the FCC and Department of Education’s clear stance against the banning those sites. The CIPA, through its own fault, has given school and library (or local) officials justification and protection for the censorship of internet resources that was never meant to be blocked. Also there is no guidance to the filtering process past not having anything inappropriate, so schools and libraries are often left with moronic censorship programs that either underblock or underblock. For instance, at our school, NPR (a renowned news source) is blocked, while the ending of "Sausage Party" (which consists of food engaging in explicit actions) on youtube is not.

Minors in schools across the country have expressed their frustration with the new censorship programs. Even the American Association of School Librarians has acknowledged the CIPA’s faults, saying “Students, teachers, and school librarians in many schools are frustrated daily when they discover legitimate educational websites blocked by filtering software installed by their school.” Students are having valuable resources for academia and personal support blocked due to censorship, and but aren’t even being properly protected from harmful material. Whether it is specification of what is inappropriate or how the censorship should be handled, there needs to be a change in CIPA legislation.

Of course the CIPA isn’t entirely a failure in concept; the principle of protecting minors from overly obscene and inappropriate content is obviously noble. The CIPA also contains provisions mandating schools and libraries to teach their students how to properly utilize the internet. According to the FCC, organizations that receive E-rate support “must provide for educating minors about appropriate online behavior, including interacting with other individuals on social networking websites and in chat rooms, and cyberbullying awareness and response.” This is a valuable service that most minors will use for the rest of their lives. Regardless of whatever action is taken against the CIPA, the second half of the act should be maintained. However, there should be a change in the act; the CIPA is too broad and unspecific in its orders, therefore the law should be revised to specify what filtering process should be used (programming and all) or to just simply remove the entire process of censorship.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Featured

13 Signs You Are A True Cancer Of The Zodiac

Calling all babies born June 21st - July 22nd!

139
My Astral Life

I'm the first to admit that I am one of THOSE people who uses their zodiac sign as a description of themselves. I realize not everyone believes in astrology-related anything, and there are plenty of people who don't fit their signs. However, I'm one of the people who truly fits their sign to a tee. I'm a Cancer, a Crab, a Moon Child. It's currently our season fellow Crabs! So without further ado, here are all of the signs that you're a Cancer.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

The Blessing of Lacking Sex Appeal

To all the fellow non "it" girls out there

1414
kozepsuli.hu

Lacking sex appeal is not a desirable thing. It makes you fee not ugly, but wrong. Not having charisma is not a life goal. It doesn't make you fee friendless, but isolated. Not being the "it" girl happens, and tonight (and every nigh prior to this)

Keep Reading... Show less
Swoon

Confessions From the Single Friend of the Group

It is truly the worst place to be

4478
Confessions From the Single Friend of the Group

Look. If you are anything like me, complaining about being single is such a hard thing to because you are genuinely happy for your friends, but as they continue to be happy in their relationships, the ever crushing weight of being the single friends can become overwhelming. For context, my primary friend group consists of four people. We are all roommates and it is a great time here. All three of my roommates have boyfriends/girlfriends, which makes our friend group of four quickly jump to seven, and it is wonderful! I love my roommates so much and I love their S.O's, but no matter how much I love them I always get extremely jealous and sad. The sad thing is that the only part that ever truly ends up bugging me is that since I am single, they are my go-to top priorities and it has been really hard to watch myself slip from the top of their go-to's to not being their go to when they feel the weight of the world. What makes it harder is that expressing that I feel alone and unwanted makes me sound jealous and like I don't want my friends to hangout with their people. I get it. I do. But there are just days I want to be someone's first pick and I'm not.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

Aretha Franklin Will Forever Be A Detroit Legend, I'm Proud To Share A Hometown With Her

Aretha Franklin lost her battle to pancreatic cancer, so we stop to reflect on her powerful journey.

6386
Aretha Franklin Will Forever Be A Detroit Legend, I'm Proud To Share A Hometown With Her

Recently, Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul, passed away. Ms. Franklin grew up singing in her church's choir in Detroit. Over the years, she decided to make singing a career, first signing to Columbia Records at 18. Years later, she signed with Atlantic Records where her most powerful tunes, such as "Respect," are remembered to this day. Her breathtaking vocals earned her 18 Grammy Awards and made her one of the best-selling artists of all time.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

Life Before Emancipation

Contraband Camps in Harpers Ferry

7471

When the Civil War first broke out, the United States Army sought to preserve the Union, and did not have intentions on interfering with the institution of slavery in the rebellious states. In fact, in his first inaugural address, Abraham Lincoln promised not to interfere with slavery in the places where it already existed. Of course, at the time of this address, Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas, and Tennessee had yet to secede, so he needed to keep a moderate stance. When the U.S. Army moved into states in rebellion, generals ensured civilians that they would not interfere with slavery, and would even hep quell potential uprisings. On May 22, 1861, this attitude towards slavery began to change. Prior to then, slaves who escaped into Union lines could be returned to their masters. In some cases, troops with more abolitionist leanings would aid the runaways, but it was not yet the norm. However on May 22, three runaway slaves approached Fort Monroe along the James River seeking refuge. The slaves stated that they were about to be sent South to work on the Confederate coastal defenses in the Carolinas. Instead of returning the slaves to their masters, the commander of the fort, Benjamin Butler, claimed the slaves were contraband of war and put them to work in support of the United States. He wrote Winfield Scott, general-in-chief of all federal armies, "Shall [the enemy] be allowed the use of this property against the United States and we not be allowed its use in aid of the United States?" Following Butler's actions, 900 more slaves would gather in Fort Monroe. Congress would back Butler's stance with the First Confiscation Act in August of 1861.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments