Trump's Actions in Syria Continue the Military-Industrial Complex
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

Trump's Actions in Syria Continue the Military-Industrial Complex

To most Americans, war is hell. To those in power, it is a business opportunity.

Trump's Actions in Syria Continue the Military-Industrial Complex

80 years have passed since President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered his famous "I Hate War" speech during the early stages of the Second World War. During the second half of the twentieth century and the 21st century, this sentiment was only rarely repeated by those in power.

Our country, and therefore attitude toward war, have changed dramatically since World War II. President Roosevelt and the American people were largely against our involvement in not one, but yet another world war. However, when the Empire of Japan attacked an American naval base, we had little choice but to respond.

During the Cold War, our attitude had changed. We were no longer isolationists who attacked only when attacked. President Truman and the Truman Doctrine aimed to provide military support to any country under the threat of Communist expansion. The United States became the world's police force. The rest of the Cold War era would involve the United States' participation in a series of proxy wars against the Soviet Union, namely the Korean War and the War in Vietnam. Even today, there is widespread disagreement over the legality and legitimacy over the wars in Korea and Vietnam.

America's role as the world police force did not end here. Instead, it was particular to the Middle East, beginning decades of failed foreign policy and regime change strategies. The military-industrial complex, condemned by President Eisenhower, has been alive and well. Although our involvement in the Middle East has contributed trillions to a growing debt, there are still various golden opportunities for war profiteering.

A military-industrial complex happens when a country decides to conduct its business by investing in overseas conflicts rather than improving its own infrastructure and taking care of its own citizens. It happens when arms manufacturers, contractors, and other related entities see war as a business opportunity. Even Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State pitched the pitched the idea of looking at Iraq like a business opportunity.

The military-industrial complex is so profound that there is hardly any interest in pursuing an economically-beneficial domestic policy in the United States. It appears that the profits drawn from putting a trillion dollars into military spending far outweigh the benefits of putting a trillion dollars into rebuilding our infrastructure. The latter, those in power believe, certainly wouldn't retain our reputation as the world's police.

The "War on Terror" has given the United States a convenient enemy. Terrorists are not confined to a single country. Much like the Cold War, we can attack anyone, anywhere as long as the case is made that we are fighting terror. The case does not even have to be true for us to engage. In turn, our tax dollars go directly into the pockets of businesses who have the incentive to keep the war going and to deliver the invoice to Congress.

It has been 11 weeks of the new Trump Administration and we still do not have a plan to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure according to one of President Trump's cornerstone campaign promises. Instead, we do have a plan to increase military spending by 54 billion while defunding essentially everything else. There is a plan, though the word "plan" is used lightly, to attack the Assad Regime in Syria over the latest chemical weapons attack.

There was a time back in 2013 where President Trump was right. Obama needed congressional approval to attack Syria unless the United States was directly under attack.

Even Senator Rand Paul, a supporter of the Tea Party movement, knows this. Congress knows this. The Authorization for Use of Military Force passed after 9/11 allows the President to take direct military action without Congress only to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States. Meaning, when we are at a direct risk. Does the chemical weapons attack in Syria, abhorrent though it is, present a credible threat to the United States? This is the case that the Trump Administration would have to make to avoid authorizing an unconstitutional missile strike.

"The President needs congressional authorization for military action as required by the Constitution, and I call on him to come to Congress for a proper debate. Our prior interventions in this region have done nothing to make us safer, and Syria will be no different."
- Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)

The bottom line is that Trump's approval to attack an airfield in Syria is an act of war that needed congressional approval. It is not enough to come to an emotional conclusion that those responsible for the attack in Syria deserved retaliation. Indeed they do. However, there is a method for the President to follow regardless of whether or not the United States was at risk of a terrorist attack.

The following events will continue the military-industrial complex and decades of regime change foreign policy without thinking about what will happen the next day. In other words, the same status quo foreign policy which turned many voters away from voting for Hillary Clinton.

The United States must stop recklessly engaging with foreign dictators and thereby creating a vacuum for terrorism to thrive. It is not a secret nor a conspiracy that our inconsiderate involvement in the Middle East has led to the rise of terrorist groups.

There is no need to say that the consequences of war are devastating beyond orindary human comprehension. Every American living today has been alive to witness war. This includes the politicians who send us there. This includes the businesses who profit from it. Despite spending most of our history as a country involved in conflicts, The United States does not hate war and likely never will.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
What College Girls Remember from their Summers as a Kid

Yes, summer is almost here.. so what should we remember

Keep Reading... Show less
The 100 Things Millennials have ruined: A Comprehensive List

Millennials: the generation everyone loves to hate. The babies of 1980 to 1995 take a lot of heat. I mean, we inherited a crashed economy, earn stagnant wages, live with crippling student loan debt, and try to enact change in a rigged system but our affinity for avocado toast and use of technology has wrecked society as we know it! As a tail end millennial, I wanted to know what I was ruining and, like any other annoying millennial would, I did some research. I scoured the internet, read online newspapers and scrolled through every listicle I could find. So, in case you needed another reason to resent the millennial in your life, here are the 100 industries we've killed, things we've ruined or concepts we've destroyed.

Keep Reading... Show less

Anxiety Doesn't Discriminate

This month, Odyssey brings about awareness & normality to conversations around mental health from our community.

Anxiety Doesn't Discriminate

It's no secret that even in 2018 our country still struggles with discrimination of all kinds. Society labels individuals by the color of their skin, heritage, religion, sexuality, gender, size, and political beliefs. You are either privileged or you're not. However, here's the thing, anxiety doesn't care about your privilege. Anxiety doesn't discriminate.

Keep Reading... Show less
College Boy Charm is Real and it's Very Sexy

After surviving a year of college and watching "Clueless" countless times, I've come to the conclusion that college boy charm is very much a real thing and it's very very attractive. It's easiest explained through Paul Rudd's character, Josh, in "Clueless". The boy who has a grip on his life and is totally charming. In this article, I will list the qualities of a specimen with College Boy Charm, to help you identify him at your next party or other social events.

Keep Reading... Show less

Tik Tok Stars: Worth the Hype? or Overrated?

As Tik-Tokers rise to fame, do their 'copy-cat' dances deserve the clout?

Tik Tok Stars: Worth the Hype? or Overrated?

Oh, the wonders of social media. Trends come and go just as quick as a story on Instagram, everyone posting for their shot at fifteen minutes of fame, and the ever growing following of a new type of celebrity- social media influencers and content creators. Everyone who owns a smartphone probably has Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, and now Tik-Tok, as it's growing to be a major social media platform for teenagers and young adults. Tik Tok became popular in the United States in late 2019 and since then has grown a considerable amount. Personally, I was one to make fun of Tik-Tok and say it was a dumb app like or Triller, and now months later, I spend more time on it than I do on Instagram.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments