New Jersey state assemblyman Michael Carroll has introduced new legislation regarding the legal drinking age in his state. Currently, the drinking age stands at 21 years old, but Carroll is aiming to lower the age to 18. He argues that if 18-year-olds are able to enlist in the military, they should also be entitled to other adult privileges, such as being able to purchase alcohol.
This is far from the first time New Jersey's drinking laws have been challenged. In 1973, New Jersey lowered the drinking age from 21 to 18. Then, in 1980, they raised it back up to 19. Finally, in 1983, the drinking age was restored back to 21. This yo-yo-ing of changes is due to the issues that lowering the drinking age caused. Drunk driving (and subsequent fatalities) rose after the changes, only falling back down after the law was reverted. Many are arguing that assemblyman Carroll is attempting to cause New Jersey residents to relive past mistakes.
It has been proven that, when those under 21 consume alcohol, there can be serious affects on development. Despite the argument that "18-year-olds are adults and should be able to choose what they want to do," their minds are still not done maturing. Alcohol consumption in young people can cause issues with brain functions, such as emotional regulation, planning and organization.
Should this legislation pass? New Jersey will not only see a rise in D.U.I. offenses and fatalities, but it will also see an increase in drinking for those under 18. 18-year-olds will undoubtedly supply alcohol to their underage friends.
This is a question of whether or not it is worth sacrificing the health and safety of New Jersey residents for young people's ability to drink. Although this legislation is unlikely to pass, it is important to educate ourselves on the issue. What are your thoughts on this debate?
