Manhattan vs. Vegas: Why Is Manhattan A Terrorist Attack And Vegas Isn't?
Start writing a post

Manhattan vs. Vegas: Why Is Manhattan A Terrorist Attack And Vegas Isn't?

It's not because Paddock was white.

Manhattan vs. Vegas: Why Is Manhattan A Terrorist Attack And Vegas Isn't?
U.S. National Archives

In the immediate aftermath of the Manhattan Attack on October 31st, people have been swift to express outrage at the incident being labeled a "terror attack," so quickly, when the attack in Vegas over a month ago still has not been, claiming that it was due to the race of the attacker. But not everything has to do with race... so let's look at some other possible reasons, including how the Manhattan Attack is different from Vegas, and why it was so quickly discerned to be an act of terror, while Vegas still has not been.

1. Motive

In Vegas, even weeks after the attack, law enforcement has struggled in vain to riddle out the killer's motive. They struggled to find any preexisting links to ISIS (though they did claim the attack, happy to take credit for the carnage whether there was a connection or not), or any information at all about why he would have done this. Without the killer present for interrogation, we are still searching for answers.

In Manhattan, however, it has been a different story. During the course of the attack, the killer shouted the oft-heard cry of Islamic terror--"allahu akbar." Early reports also indicate that the 29-year old man left a note declaring his allegiance to IS. While there is no evidence to say that he was directly affiliated with the terror group--and there is evidence he was likely radicalized from within the US after his immigration--his acts were undeniably inspired by and on behalf of his allegiance, even down to the choice to use a vehicle as the weapon, as used by many other lone wolf attackers this year. The intention was clearly terror, which earns this attack the brand of a "terror incident," without question.

2. Planning

Another factor that must be considered when determining how to class an attack, is why it was conducted the way it was. This is something that is not easy to think about, but important nonetheless.

In Vegas, the shooter sought to inflict as much damage as possible, with no real template as to why or how his choices were made in this matter. He targeted a large group of people, with maximum damage weapons, from a distant location so he could not be as easily stopped--but these were not guided, as far as we know, by an allegiance, or any other inspiration. It is speculated in this case that perhaps he wanted to go down in history, or that it was part of an intended murder/suicide. Who's to say?

On the other hand, the attack in Manhattan was somewhat different. IS tends to pick high-visibility targets, in big world cities such as New York, London, and Berlin. This choice seems to be more important than the death toll for these attackers, as it is more likely they will harm people from many different countries and garner more attention.

Another increasingly popular tactic among true terror groups is to utilize a weapon no one can predict--as we have seen far too often this year, more attackers are using trucks and cars. You can't force people not to drive in the same way you can ban guns or check for explosives in suspicious backpacks, which makes it near impossible to stop. While it may not have the same death toll, it doubles that opportunity to get away with it.

One final act of planning which increases the terroristic effects of such an attack is the randomness. As I'm sure many of us have experienced, we can be cautioned to avoid concerts, told by our parents to avoid any big sporting events or gatherings, to try and stay safe; but you can't avoid walking down the street in broad daylight.

The common strategy used by those with the intent of causing terror is something prevalent in the Manhattan attack, whereas it was not with Vegas. This is the kind of thought process that makes a difference between an act of terror, and a sick, twisted act of taking revenge on the world that somehow scorned you.

There are many other factors to consider as well, to be sure--such as the way Stephen Paddock killed himself before he could be caught, whereas the Manhattan killer attempted to continue his onslaught--but one thing is to be certain: while both attacks were terrible, horrible incidents carried out by cowardly and disgusting individuals, they were also very different. There is something to be said for the difference between a psychopathic murder/suicide and someone who, in their rational mind, thinks this is what needs to be done.

There, my friends, lies the difference between terror attacks and massacres, not in race.

My thoughts and prayers are with Manhattan, now. Stay safe. x

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

That Feeling of Opening Day

What it means and What Happened

That Feeling of Opening Day

Baseball's Opening Day has inspired countless writers, fans, and players throughout the years. Some notable quotes we remember about this special day are:

Keep Reading... Show less

To The 'Best Friend' I Decided I Couldn't Be Friends With Anymore

Most of all, thank you for being the person who finally pushed me to choose myself.

The CW / YouTube

Dear Old Friend,

Keep Reading... Show less

7 Tips For Traveling

Don't miss any of these ideas to make your trip complete!

7 Tips For Traveling

Whether it's a day trip, an out-of-state journey, or an experience leaving the country, here are some tried and true traveling tips.

Before any trip, we all think about what to pack and what to bring. We may have a strict itinerary, or we may have looser guidelines for what to do when. But we should also consider the following - make them goals:

Keep Reading... Show less

Writer of the Month: Hunter Johnstone

As an aspiring author, Hunter knew writing for Odyssey would be a great fit for her.

Writer of the Month: Hunter Johnstone

Response writers are what make the world go round at Odyssey! Using our response button feature, they carry on our mission of sparking positive, productive conversations in a polarized world.

Keep Reading... Show less
Allison Fishman

1. Why is Wilson Hall so complicated to navigate? Even as a senior, I still get lost in Wilson. As a freshman, I was warned about the unnecessary complexity of the building, was laughed at by upperclassman for my confused looks on the first day of school and walked and rewalked the whole hall before finding my classroom. #annoying.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments