It (2017)
Start writing a post

It (2017)

Film review by Francisco Olivera

It (2017)

It (2017) September 13, 2017

Directed by Andy Muschietti

Written by Chase Palmer, Cary Fukunaga, & Gary Dauberman

3 stars (out of 4)

It, the newest adaptation of the Stephen King novel of the same name, is a faithful adaptation. I’d argue it’s a better adaptation than the 1990 3-hour TV film, in which Tim Curry played Pennywise the clown with camp and creepiness. Now comes Bill Skarsgård to step in as the child-eating clown, and just wait until you see his take on the killer monster. The opening scene with alone is worth the price of admission.

The film centers on seven children in Derry, Maine, who are terrorized by a creature with the ability to shape shift into anything it desires. To make matters the worse, the kids are the only ones who can see the creature (usually taking the form of Pennywise the clown), since adults can’t see it themselves. When Bill Denbrough (the film’s main character, played by Jaeden Lieberher) loses his little brother, Georgie (Jackson Robert Scott), to Pennywise, Bill becomes convinced Georgie is still alive and decides to team up with his friends from school to find him. Bill’s friends and himself make up a posse called The Losers Club, since they are the targets of bullies and the nerds of their high school. The gang all have moments to shine and show their acting chops, including Bill, Ben Hanscom (Jeremy Ray Taylor), Beverly Marsh (Sophia Lillis), Richie Tozier (a hilarious and lively Finn Wolfhard), Mike Hanlon (Chosen Jacobs), Stan Uris (Wyatt Oleff), and Eddie Kaspbrak (Jack Dylan Grazer). Although most of the film is centered on the gang’s journey in finding Pennywise, each of the kids suffer at the hands of their parents and guardians. In this universe, or at least in this creepy town, the adults are as villainous as the clown (such as Beverly having a pedophile for a father, Ben’s parents being neglectful towards him, etc.) However, the star of the show is none other than Bill Skarsgård. His Pennywise is equally effective as Tim Curry’s 1990 role, but Skarsgård adds a childlike menace along with an unsettling body language that Curry

The rest of the film follows the gang as they vow to find and confront Pennywise, and part of the film’s biggest surprises lies in these scenes of adolescence with a coming-of-age vibe. Think Netflix’s Stranger Things, 1986’s Stand By Me (another Stephen King adaptation), or 1985’s The Goonies and you will begin to realize what type of spirit this film embodies. The only aspect different from the previous titles mentioned would be the newest It adaptation contains run-of-the-mill horror scenes and bloody violence (as well mature subject matter, such as one scene of an almost attempted rape), but these kids from the Loser’s Club have the same urge of determination in finding what they’re after.

It’s rare for me to actually say I had a fun time watching a horror movie (most of the time I do if the film is well made), but It has more scenes that are comedic in nature than actual scary scenes. Not that it should be labeled as a horror comedy, but the script (one of the writers being Cary Joji Fukunaga, the mastermind behind Season 1 of HBO’s True Detective) is a thoughtful adaptation that still attains the childlike innocence of kids in a perilous adventure. This is attributed to the fact that this film has Stephen King written all over it (pun intended), in which the main characters face off with the utmost form of danger imaginable. Stephen King novels and film adaptations have given popular culture some of the best villains, from Jack Torrance in The Shining to Annie Wilkes in Misery.

Keep in mind this film has some serious elements that can be borderline depressing, but these scenes never dwell for a long time. Quite the contrary, the film will leave you talking helplessly after. I hope It generates enough word of mouth to its already grand box-office success. It’s one of the best Stephen King adaptations since 1999’s The Green Mile. Go out, if you dare, and experience It.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments