The Truth About India

India Is More Than The Slums You See In Movies, Take A Seat And Learn About Some Of Our Strengths

Learn about one of the most underrated and controversial countries: India.


Let's be honest, shall we? The first idea that most of the non-resident Indians have of the country is that it is a filthy slum. Thanks to a few of the great, successful movies, like "Slumdog Millionaire" and "Lion." I'm not against these movies. They were marvelous, but growing up as an Indian resident and watching these movies has made me and many other kids my age feel insecure about our country for no reason.

I do not disagree with the fact that slums and poverty are parts of India, but it is also true that it is much more than just that. I'm not boasting about India through this article, but I want to show everyone a brighter side of it.

1. Literacy rate

Although India's overall literacy rate is not as high as in developed countries, it has some of the highest literacy growth in the world. The literacy rate of the country has grown from 16.1% during British rule to 74.04% post-Independence and is growing at an average rate of 6% to 8% every 10 years.

2. Usage of English

Firstly, those who think, "How can most of the Indians speak English fluently?" please know that it is a universal language. To communicate with people from other parts of the world, knowing English is a must. Secondly, higher education in India is conducted entirely in English despite being home to more than 1000 different languages. Thirdly, the primary mode of communication for a major percentage of schools in India is in English. The usage of the language has gone to an extent where Indian movies have songs with English lyrics, billboards are in English, and one of the most important requirements for a well-payed job in the country is to speak English fluently.

3. Food

India is more than just curry (fun fact: curry stands for gravy/sauce to Indians, so the term should not solely be restricted to our cuisine). Interestingly, every state of the country has different kinds of cuisine with different kinds of taste and preparation. However, in general, there are seven major kinds of Indian cuisine: Bengali (specializes in the perfect blend of sweet and spicy), Rajasthani (specializes in high content of spice), Gujarati (specializes in vegetarian food with high nutritional value), Kashmiri (specializes in dishes whose cooking style is adopted in Central Asia, Persia, and Afghanistan), Mughlai (specializes in dishes predominantly influenced by the cooking style practiced during the Mughal era), Punjabi (specializes in enormous varieties of mouth-watering vegetarian as well as nonvegetarian dishes in which the spice content ranges from minimal to pleasant to high) and South Indian (specializes in light, low-calorie, appetizing dishes).

4. Job opportunities

Despite the gradual decrease of employment in India, there are certain jobs that will never go out of style (at least not in the near future). Few such job titles in India that can still make a person rich are marketing professionals, IT and software engineers, investment bankers, chartered accountants, commercial pilots, and medical professionals.

5. Economy

As per the International Monetary Fund, the Indian Economy in 2017 was worth $2.61 trillion making it the sixth largest economy by exchange rates and is, at $9.459 trillion, the third-largest by purchasing power parity. Its average annual GDP growth rate of 5.8% over the past two decades, and reaching 6.1% during 2011 to 2012, makes India one of the world's fastest-growing economies.

6. Religion

India is a secular country. The religions in the country consist of Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism, and others. Though majority follow either Hinduism, Islam, or Christianity, it also has the world's largest Sikh, Jain, Zoroastrian, and Bahá'í populations.

7. Flora and fauna

India lies within the Indomalaya ecozone and contains three biodiversity hotspots. It is one of 17 megadiverse countries. It is home to 8.6% of all mammalian, 13.7% of all avian, 7.9% of all reptilian, 6% of all amphibian, 12.2% of all piscine, and 6.0% of all flowering plant species. Forests range from tropical to coniferous. India contains 172 IUCN-designated threatened animal species, or 2.9% of endangered forms including the Asiatic lion, the Bengal tiger, the snow leopard, and the Indian white-rumped vulture. It also hosts more than 500 wildlife sanctuaries and 13 biosphere reserves.

8. Tourism

India is a country with a diverse territory. Starting from the Himalayan peaks to the Indian Ocean coastline and its history reaching back five millennia, India is multifarious in terms of tourism. Some general tourism ideas including visiting Delhi's Red Fort complex, massive Jama Masjid mosque, Agra's iconic Taj Mahal mausoleum, bathing in the Ganges in Varanasi as pilgrims, going to Rishikesh, which is a yoga centre and base for Himalayan trekking, taking a houseboat into the backwaters of Kerala, visiting the first British capital of India, Kolkata, and Gateway of India at Mumbai, etc.

9. Safety

The level of crime is moderate in India and is relatively safe for tourists. It is the 106th safest country in the world, even amidst the controversies surrounding it.

10.  Film industry

Believe it or not, the Indian film industry produces the world's most-watched cinema with as many as 1600 films produced in various languages every year. Mostly because established regional cinematic traditions exist besides just Bollywood. Also, Bollywood is not a genre of movie. It's just the name given to the Mumbai-based film industry that creates movies in mainly Hindi. It has movies of various genres just like Hollywood does, and no, there is no "place" called Bollywood in India (as many would think since it sounds like Hollywood).

This was a myth breaker to the kind of India that is portrayed in most of the International movies/shows. Every country has its pros and cons but the cons should not take over the pros, not even in others' heads. Hopefully, this was a useful article to make you understand a better part of the culture that India has.

Also, please do visit India, because Indians believe in "Atithi Devo Bhava" — guests are equal to God.

Popular Right Now

Police Brutality Doesn't Happen Because Of Racist Cops, It Happens Because Of A Lack Of Efficient Training

The use of excessive force by law enforcement officers is derived from the lack of emphasis put on defensive tactics training, not racial motives.

The use of excessive force by law enforcement officers has constantly bombarded the news and social media outlets in the recent years. Infamous cases of police brutality are constantly sweeping the nation. The cases of Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Ezell Ford, Tamir Rice, Antonio Martin, and Sureshbhai Patel are recent examples of perceived police brutality in America. In the majority of these cases, the suspect is African-American and the police officer is Caucasian. This coincidence of racial differences has led many people in America and around the world to speculate that the underlying cause of police brutality is racial discrimination and racism. However, the actual cause of police brutality is the lack of an effective defensive tactics training curriculum in law enforcement agencies.

Police brutality has always been a relevant topic in my life. Growing up black in an economically disadvantaged area, or the "hood," relations with law enforcement officers have always been strained. The majority of black moms warn their kids to be careful of what they do in order to avoid confrontation with law enforcement officers. Most of the kids in the "hood" are being raised by their grandparents and that contributes to the bad relationships with law enforcement officers because the grandparents grew up in a time period where discrimination, segregation, and police brutality due to racial prejudice were rampant and an everyday social norm.

African-Americans from the American Civil Rights Era of the 20th century spread the idealism that white law enforcement officers are racist and fear that their loved ones will become a victim of police brutality. The reality is that times have changed and while racism and prejudice still exist in America, not every law enforcement official is going to harm someone because of their race. That was a lesson I did not learn until after I moved out of the "hood," in a small town in Louisiana, to Houston, Texas.

While living in Houston I was exposed to law enforcement officers in schools. My middle school had a white Houston ISD police officer and I was nervous every time I saw him. I tried my best to avoid him at all costs. One day I accidentally had an interaction with him, and he turned out to be one of the nicest people I have ever met. Ever since that day, my view of law enforcement officers has changed.

The ideology that the "hood" instilled in me was instantly proven to be wrong. Being in the law enforcement pathway at Wunsche taught me that police officers are taught to be community-oriented, and it made me question the origin of police brutality in recent times. I was not satisfied with the amount of police brutality cases that were being broadcasted on the news, and I knew I wanted to be a part of the solution to combat police brutality in America.

The lack of emphasis on defensive tactics training is a major problem that faces the law enforcement community. Police officers carry life-saving tools such as tasers, pepper spray, batons, and firearms. Officers have an increased reliance on their tools and their emphasis on hands-on defensive tactics techniques are decreased due to this over-reliance on their tools.

As a result of the decrease in knowledge of hands-on skills, the police officers' fear of physically interacting with a suspect increases; therefore the chance of using excessive force and even the use of deadly force drastically rise. The growing number of excessive force cases cause police departments to create bad relationships within their communities.

In 2010 the National Police Misconduct Statistical Reporting Project recorded 4,861 reports of police misconduct that involved 6,613 sworn law enforcement officers. Of the 6,613 officers involved in misconduct, 1,575 were involved in excessive force reports, which were the most prominent type of report at 23.8% of all reports. 897 of the excessive force cases involved were cases of physical use of force complaints which include fist strikes, throws, chokeholds, baton strikes, and other physical attacks.

Two hundred and thirty two of the officers were involved in firearm-related excessive complaints, 166 were involved in taser-related cases, and the remaining other cases involved a combination of force types: use of police dogs, police vehicles, and chemical weapons such as tear gas. There have been credible allegations of excessive force that led to 127 deaths. With excessive force cases being the most prominent, they will receive the most news coverage.

2010 NPMSRP Police Misconduct Statistical Report

In 2015 Cable News Network (CNN), revealed a video of a police officer, Michael Slager, shooting an unarmed man, Walter Scott, as he ran away from Slager after a traffic stop. Scott's death sparked renewed "Black Lives Matter" protests after the 50-year-old became the latest in a series of unarmed black men killed by police. The "Black Lives Matter" organization used the death of Scott to help promote their ideology that white cops are racist and America does not want blacks to succeed.

After investigating, CNN authors Holly Yan, Khushbu Shah, and Emanuella Grinberg published a news article with the headline, "Ex-officer Michael Slager pleads guilty in shooting death of Walter Scott," where they stated that according to court documents, "Slager's first attempt to use his Taser did not stop Scott. The second deployment dropped Scott to the ground but he got up and took off running again. As he was fleeing, Slager shot him," (Yan).

After reading the news article, I knew it was not a matter of racial issues but a matter of lack of training. When officer Slager first noticed that his taser was not effective he should have used another secondary option available. When Scott fled, Slager should have pursued him on foot and handled the situation hands-on instead of shooting Scott in the back. Slager shooting Scott in the back is an obvious sign of the lack of training received by Slager to handle a suspect who is unresponsive to a taser.

Another example of a recent police brutality case that took the nation by storm was when Eric Garner died after being put in a chokehold by New York Police Department Officer Daniel Pantaleo. In 2014, Deborah Bloom and Jareen Imam of CNN posted, "New York man dies after chokehold by police," which displays a video of officer Pantaleo confronting Garner for allegedly selling cigarettes illegally.

After minutes of verbal conversation, the officers tried to detain Garner but Garner refused and told the officers not to touch him. Seconds later Officer Pantaleo is shown choking Garner. During the video, Garner can be heard saying "I can't breathe! I can't breathe!" as he is being shoved onto the pavement by four other NYPD officers.

The chokehold tactic is prohibited by the NYPD, therefore the officer should have never used that tactic to apprehend Garner. Secondly, immediately after the officer manipulated Garner into a prone position on the ground, he should have then released the chokehold and then secured Garner in handcuffs. Officer Pantaleo should have used a wrist manipulation technique or any other non-lethal restraint besides the rear naked choke because the rear naked choke immediately reduces the supply of oxygen to the brain by compressing the trachea and other vital organs to breathing effectively, and therefore causes the receiver of the rear naked choke to suffocate.

Suffocation leads to unconsciousness and ultimately, if not released, brain damage or death, and that is what makes the rear naked choke a move that should only be used where the officer's life is in immediate danger. Officer Pantaleo's offense of excessive force is clear in the video and could have been prevented if he was properly trained in defensive tactics, on knowing the level of force necessary needed to apprehend a suspect, and knowing when to decrease the amount of forced used after a suspect is in a position where he can be safely detained.

My method of combating the increasing number of excessive force cases is by increasing the amount of emphasis put on defensive combat training for law enforcement officers. My extensive knowledge of martial arts from years of training under Chuck Norris and his program Kickstart Kids inspired my solution. My knowledge of the martial arts gives me the confidence necessary to act calm and rational in a physical altercation. I believe that if law enforcement officers had knowledge in various forms of martial arts that it will reduce the number of police brutality cases.

As stated by Keith Underwood, former law enforcement officer, in my interview with him, "the amount of training it takes to be proficient at hand to hand combat is a lot…training is about clear consistent training and the consistency is the problem."

My program would partner with the Gracie Jiu-Jitsu Academy by certifying instructors in the Gracie Survival Tactics (GST) Military/Law Enforcement Instructor Course. Ryron and Rener Gracie are the instructors training law enforcement officers to become instructors in the GST course.

The Gracie brothers are martial art masters with extensive knowledge of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. In their Youtube video, "Las Vegas Police Officer Uses Jiu-Jitsu to Control Larger Suspect," Ryron and Rener Gracie demonstrate and elaborate on how proper knowledge in defensive tactics techniques give law enforcement officials the ability to control a suspect without having to resort to excessive force which may include deadly force.

The Gracie brothers explain how deadly weapons are always available in law enforcement situations and if an officer does not have the resources to maintain control, the situation could turn deadly. Excessive force is due to the lack of training. An officer without options is an accident waiting to happen. If an officer does not have knowledge of intermediate force options or hands-on tactics, then an officer is more likely to use excessive force prematurely.

The use of excessive force by law enforcement officers is derived from the lack of emphasis put on defensive tactics training, not racial motives. The only way to bring police brutality to a halt is to put a stronger emphasis on hand to hand fighting techniques. A federally funded program would ensure that officers are being trained effectively, responsibly and properly. Training our law enforcement officers will not only benefit the officers' knowledge in defensive tactics, but it will also help rebuild community relationships with law enforcement. The program will be the stepping stone to building a strong foundation for national unity with law enforcement officials. The strong relationship that can be built will help heal the wounds suffered in our nation and ensure prosperity for all.

Cover Image Credit: Unsplash

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

I Want My School To Be As Diverse As Their Advertisements Claim They Are

Several campuses pride themselves on a wide range of individuals who attend their institutions, but what is the reality versus the things we see?


When deciding on a college I wanted to know what I was going to be getting myself into for 4 years. I watched so many videos of Boise State Universities campus to find out what I had to look forward to. I was from a smaller town in Southern California so I was very used to the amount of diversity in my school and basically whole life at that point. I am a White Mexican-American female and while growing up in my city, I was a part of the minority of white individuals. I always wanted a campus who would represent me, or I could see myself at. I looked at so many ads before I did a campus tour and looked at stacks of brochures scattered across my room with my sister. I saw people who looked like the friends I had throughout my life, my family, and most importantly myself.

I took two tours of the campus and noticed that there was a lack of the people I saw on the brochures on the actual campus and city. I walked around only really seeing individuals who were white. I drove the 14 hours back home and continued to think about how I didn't see the diversity that was advertised in everything I saw from the university. It wasn't until the big move-in day that I realized the lack of diversity I was experiencing in the staff and the individuals I shared classrooms with. When you check the university's website you can see the numbers and the lack of diversity.

  • American Indian/Alaska Native — <1% (118)
  • Asian — 2% (595)
  • Black/African American — 2% (425)
  • Hispanic/Latino — 13% (3,243)
  • Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander — <1% (121)
  • Not Reported — 4% (914)
  • Two or More Races — 4% (1.079)
  • White — 73% (18,612)
  • Nonresident (International) — 2% (433)

The numbers I was seeing wasn't matching the things I was seeing around, and it wasn't until I conducted my own research and interviews with my peers that I noticed that I wasn't the only individual that was craving more diversity on campus. Other students wanted to more people who were like them around campus. Boise State University is not the only campus that will push diversity when its really to only meet their quota. Students who transferred from Arizona State University also mentioned to me that they face similar issues and feelings around diversity from their campus. I want to bring the topic of diversity to many of the student organizations on campus to help our voice be heard for a want for a more diverse campus.

Related Content

Facebook Comments