- Hillary, ok, she doesn’t know how she would stop all the aliens from coming in. She has never held an office as high as the Emperor of Jupiter, like me. And I wasn't just Emperor, ok, I was the best Emperor, a terrific Emperor. I was voted best Emperor 10 years in a row, alright? That’s yuge. No one in the history of the Milky Way can say that. I am the most qualified, ok, the MOST qualified in galactic politics. Ok, you give her a map, she can’t even point to Jupiter on a map. The mother of ISIS doesn't even know that Jupiter is under Madagascar. It’s shameful.
- People ask me, Donald the Incredible, they ask me they ask, Where have all the unicorns gone? Donald, you sexy fuck, where are all the dragons? Well, I have disheartening news. Ok? It is so disheartening I almost don’t want to say it. It’s almost as though I am just letting shit pour out of my mouth to not only dance around the issue but to fill time, but I am not, it really is just so disheartening. China. China, ok? China lied about the climate change so that we would stop using our factories, so we would just walk out of them with the machines still on, and they rounded up all the dragons and the unicorns, Xi Jinping, I saw him I said, What is that shit, a tumor horse? And he said to me, Donny, baby, it’s a unicorn. I told them to return them, but he said he was too afraid to return them to the birthplace of ISIS.
- I can believe it’s not butter, alright? I’ve believed it was not butter since before the first churn was made. That’s the liberals for you. They rig the interwebs to say that I can’t believe it’s not butter, they even go so far as to put it on the side of the tubs, ok? But I saw right through their shit since day one. I turned to the 12-year-old I was fucking at the time and I said, This shit isn’t butter. Go ahead, ask her. But don’t ask her her age.
- I’m not just going to build a wall, ok? I am going to build a wall, it’s going to be the most capitalist wall you’ve ever seen, alright? There will be a Starbucks built into it every 300 feet, with a McDonald’s every mile. But I am going to take it a step further, alright? I am going to build a wall around every building in Mexico. They can’t jump over our wall if they have their own walls to jump over. We have to stop this problem at the source. I have a plan to strengthen all Mexican uterine walls, but that will be a few years in the making, but it’s going to be great. The greatest. So great.
- No ma’am, you’re too drunk, I don’t think coitus would be right. You're not coherent enough to give consent.
Welcome back
Sign in to comment to your favorite stories, participate in your community and interact with your friends
or
LOG IN WITH FACEBOOKNo account? Create one
Recommended for you
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
StableDiffusion
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Politics![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
