- “I was actually forced into an arranged marriage with the Prince of Denmark, so I'm just waiting to finish my degree before moving back there to take the throne.“
- “I'm in a very intimate relationship with Ben, Jerry, and Netflix. Polygamy is becoming a widely accepted!"
- “My parents won't let me date."
- "I really need to work on myself right now … dating other people has made me lose sight of what's truly important, me."
- “Medically, it's not safe for me to date."
- “I have made the decision to commit myself to God and join a seminary post-grad."
- “I lost the key to my chastity belt. There's no app to help me relocate it. So that might be a deal breaker."
- “Single as in a unitary being? Yes, I am. I consider myself to be a stark introvert … so if you would … please leave me alone."
- “I'm training for a marathon and that takes a lot of commitment to winning. Therefore, I'm following the words of Charlie Sheen, “bi-winning." I'm currently in a three-way relationship with a pair of twins. Does that count?"
- Try anyone of these and see if he doesn't get the message: “I'm actually currently eating for two." “I've got a bun in the oven." Or “I'm looking forward to the celebration of new life in the coming 9 months."
- Just start crying and walk away
- “I've committed myself to becoming a lifelong bachelor, and the lifestyle that comes with it. Are you interested ;)?"
- “I only date men with Dad-Bods. Sorry."
- “As a child of the 90s and a mama's girl, I was always told to have high standards. As a result, I've committed myself to only dating, and promptly marrying, one of the members of N*SYNC."
- Give them the death glare until they walk away.
- “Yes, I am! But sadly, I've recently joined the Peace Corps and I won't be around for the next 10 years or so. Wait for me?"
- “Currently, I've taken the role of John Tucker as research for my next acting role. So, technically I have 3 girlfriends but I'm still available, that work for you?"
- “I only love my cat and I must remain loyal to her as she is to me."
- “I spend too much time juggling Ford on-the-go, The Big Bang Theory, Tark mart, and vending machines, that I truly don't have time for anyone else in my life."
- Yes.
Welcome back
Sign in to comment to your favorite stories, participate in your community and interact with your friends
or
LOG IN WITH FACEBOOKNo account? Create one
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
StableDiffusion
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Student Life![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
