Some food is very unique to Auburn, while other restaurants are in practically every city. After being at Auburn for a couple of years, one finds that the selection of restaurants located on and off campus dwindle and become somewhat boring. But in the past two or three years, Auburn has acquired new restaurants on and off campus that have given people more of a variety to choose from. Here are some pros and cons of eating on and off campus at Auburn University.On campus dining has a wide variety of locations and different restaurants or food stations located around campus. The Village Dining Hall, Terrell, Foy, The Student Center and Lupton are all different locations. For on campus students, all of these are in walking distance. Another pro about Auburn dining are the Food Trucks. Along our concourse, Smooth N Groove, Whatchawant, Grilled Cheezy, and General Lee are parked for students to choose from.
A downfall about on campus dining is the hours. All restaurants have peculiar hours, and only a few stay open all day from breakfast to dinner. The Auburn University App that is available for download on phones is big help when viewing dining hours. Also, the Auburn dining experience on campus is a little different. For instance, the set up in The Village Dining Hall is like a cafeteria, although you purchase everything individually. Swiping in once and filling up your tray is not an option. Students that live on campus start out with roughly $900, but on campus money goes quickly over the semester.
Moving from a city in Florida where there are many different options and diverse restaurants, I found that Auburn was a little hard to adjust to in the eating department. Most restaurants in Auburn are chains that have very little variety and few healthy options.
Although there are many chain restaurants, there are some individual restaurants that make Auburn special and stand out. Acre, Hamilton’s On Magnolia, Amsterdam Cafe, Moe’s Original BBQ, and Big Blue Bagel & Deli are unique restaurants that come to mind when I think of Auburn. I look forward to eating at these specific restaurants when I come back to school for fall and spring semesters. These restaurants all have diverse menus and are different from the chain fast food restaurant.
Whether living on or off campus, dining can sometimes be the toughest choice you’ll make all day. Between prices, hours and assortment Auburn can be a little tricky at times to find the perfect meal that will hit the spot. But let’s be honest: the dining experience might be a little shaky at times, but remember, Auburn students go to Auburn and love it.
Welcome back
Sign in to comment to your favorite stories, participate in your community and interact with your friends
or
LOG IN WITH FACEBOOKNo account? Create one
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
StableDiffusion
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Entertainment
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Towson University]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
