Ok, let me set this straight. Most men have had some point and time where we thought about women in inappropriate ways. We have thought about having sex with multiple women. What I mean by "we" is men as a whole. Vice versa, women have some of those same thoughts. Don't get me wrong, sex is a natural God giving gift to marriage and it's nothing wrong with it in marriage. Notice that I said "marriage." I don't believe in compromising sin. But that's a topic within it's self. Not only have we had thoughts about it, but some of us have actually done it. Some men use women to take of care of us. Some of us have women cooking for us, washing our laundry, providing a place for us to sleep, and giving us money. Notice that I said "some" because it's not all of us who are dogging women. Some of us beat on our women and called them all kinds of names because of jealousy, insecurities, and etc. I'm 22 years old and I've never experienced nothing that i'm talking about. On the other hand, I have had some dirty thoughts before and I sill do sometimes. I'm not all that experienced when it comes to women, but that's also a topic of it's own. A lot of men have made the mistake of telling a woman "I love you" and not really meaning it or not showing it. It seems to be fun while we're doing it, but have we thought about the women in our own families? Men, have we thought about our own daughters or unborn daughters? Have we thought about our younger sister(s)? How would we feel if our daughters, sisters, aunties, mothers, cousins, or even grandmothers come to us crying because a man stole from them, raped them, cheated on them, or beat on them? Things change when you are the victim or on the defending end. Yesterday, I was on my school's campus with two of my friends. One of my friends came out and said, "you know we're going to change the way way we think about women when we have daughters and even before." He also said that if I had younger sisters then i'll be more like him(referring to me). This is just something to think about. You may have to taste your own medicine one day and I promise you that it won't taste good won't taste good at all.
Recommended for you
The Illusion of Creativity
AI-generated music is often marketed as “artistic” or “educational.” But what does it really teach?
- That style can be replicated without understanding.
- That emotion can be simulated without feeling.
- That effort can be bypassed with a prompt.
For young creators, this sets a dangerous precedent. Why learn to play guitar when an algorithm can do it faster? Why study harmony when AI can generate chord progressions in seconds? The risk isn’t just laziness — it’s the loss of depth, discipline, and the tactile joy of creation.
I have listened to several AI-generated music covers. My initial reaction was one of considerable impressiveness, particularly regarding the reimagining of classic pop hits in diverse genres with novel arrangements. Here is one good example a-ha — Take On Me
However, after engaging with several such Ai generated song covers, a sense of emotional detachment emerged, attributable to the perceived absence of human artistry and genuine sentiment, resulting in a technically flawless yet ultimately soulless auditory experience.
Copyright in Crisis
What does the copyright law say about AI generated music, especially in field of music covers. Who is liable for copyright in this case, AI developers, people who used AI to generate music or people who published it on music platforms?
Recent lawsuits show that the music industry is pushing back hard:
- Universal, Sony, and Warner sued AI music platforms Suno and Udio in 2024 for allegedly training their models on copyrighted songs without permission Ars Technica The Lyon Firm.
- They’re seeking up to $150,000 per infringed song, arguing that the AI outputs resemble famous tracks and voices (e.g., Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson).
- These lawsuits target the developers of the AI tools — but they raise broader questions:The legal gray area is training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use Sites at USC.
But who’s liable?
Role | Legal Risk | Why |
AI Developers | ✅ High | For training on copyrighted material without licenses. |
Users | ⚠️ Moderate | If they intentionally recreate protected works. |
Publishers/Platforms | ✅ High | For distributing infringing content. |
The grey area lies in training data. Courts haven’t yet ruled definitively on whether using copyrighted songs to train AI counts as infringement or fair use. Meanwhile, AI-generated works themselves aren’t eligible for copyright unless a human provides substantial creative input — leaving them in legal limbo.
The Educational Mirage
Some argue that AI music helps people learn genres, production styles, or vocal techniques. But this “education” often lacks context. It’s like learning to paint by watching a printer — technically impressive, but creatively hollow.
True musical education involves:
- Struggle and iteration: Learning through mistakes.
- Emotional connection: Expressing what words can’t.
- Cultural lineage: Understanding the roots of sound.
AI shortcuts bypass all of this. And in doing so, they risk flattening the rich terrain of human creativity into a sterile landscape of algorithmic mimicry.
Why This Fight Matters
This isn’t just about music. It’s about the future of art, storytelling, and human expression. If we allow machines to dominate creative spaces, we risk turning culture into content — optimized, monetized, and devoid of soul.
We must ask: Do we want a world where art is made by machines, or one where machines help humans make better art?
5 Key Takeaways
- AI-generated music blurs the line between innovation and erosion in the creative arts
- AI-generated music raises questions about copyright, culture, education, and artistic expression
- AI-generated music can replicate style without understanding, simulate emotion without feeling, and bypass effort with a prompt
- AI-generated music sets a dangerous precedent for young creators by potentially leading to a loss of depth, discipline, and joy of creation
Trending Topics
Trending Stories
Best of Politics and Activism![Jenna Pizzi and her mom smiling by a waterfront with a historic ship in the background.]()
![Cristina Yang and Meredith Grey in scrubs sit against a wall, smiling and enjoying a break.]()
![Woman in field with a red heart-shaped balloon under a colorful sky.]()
