Looking indistinctly at some article you thinking – how could they be?
To seem unbecumming; to seem less sexual, to seem – authorate; this meaning myself apart from cummings, myself apart from its connotation. This is much the stigmum of my poetry, should I share it, should I share above? (I’ve shared above.)
What will consult of my topicals between myself is an argument, an act, unACT-messily-uniformed, which would sult into itself, without itself, con- equalling “with,” necessarily.
The issue of culminating is that my grandmother, saying “cumin” as phrased would be a certain poeter, (shared above), would with “l” be realizing that that is the correctitude, that that is a thing unrepeated, that that.
Should I share myself correctly, I would pronounce and spice thoroughly, unlike now-spice-confuse thoroughly, but will any cut I soak enough? Marenade or marinate, sonorous or impotent, a dance is more than bedroom boogie and will ball with little room between, and my absolution, to be banterable with endpoint foreseeable – to communicate best I can without becoming poetry which frankly is more inconspicuous than roundabout exact. I am no Metaphysical poet, but may I be conceited, and have answered my own question conthought.
To prompt, I will try to be less abstract. I will.
