As a student, I've noticed the increasing pressure from society on what college you go to; from college banners in guidance offices to extensive SAT tutoring classes, it seems like people care more about the college name than the college education itself. Each year, the number of college decision reaction videos on YouTube exponentially grow, and college admissions have created a toxic culture. Thus, I propose that we get rid of all major college ranking systems, including U.S. News and World Reports, Forbes, and many others, to reduce this growing pressure.
Without ranking labels, there is less pressure on students to apply to numerous top-ranked schools. Instead of applying to these colleges because of pressure from friends, family, or counselors, students will be more inclined to apply to a college they legitimately see themselves at, not just because "it's a good school." As a result, students will be more willing to commit when accepted, which can benefit the college yield rate.
Another advantage of this proposition is that it also takes the pressure off colleges to boost their rankings, which can be unintentionally detrimental to low-income students. Many college rankings take into account SAT scores, alumni donations, and yield rates, making up around 20% of a college's ranking. However, these students are sometimes unable to visit the colleges they applied to, or attend summer college programs, resulting in less "demonstrated interest" than others who can afford it. Additionally, they have no access to expensive SAT prep, let alone any connections with alumni to give donations to the school. College system rankings disproportionately hurt low-income families.
While getting rid of college ranking systems will not solve everything, it will definitely lower the pressure for high-achieving students and help low-income families. My main takeaway from the college application process is that where I go for college is not who I will become, and I hope future students applying will learn that too.