I Asked 25 UNC Students How They Feel About Silent Sam
Start writing a post

I Asked 25 UNC Students How They Feel About Silent Sam

And here's what they said...

I Asked 25 UNC Students How They Feel About Silent Sam
Indy Week

“Silent Sam” was installed in McCorkle Place, the upper quad of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in 1913 by the Daughters of the Confederacy. It was commissioned for the more than 1,000 UNC students who left their studies to fight on the side of the Confederacy in the Civil War, on the 50th anniversary of the Civil War's beginning. The statue was built facing North to signify the importance of the Union, though Silent Sam was dedicated to Confederate efforts.

Silent Sam has evolved into a point of controversy on campus and throughout the state; more recently, this controversy has received national attention. In March of 1965, Letters to the Editor were sent to The Daily Tar Heel regarding the statue's significance, history and meaning. Following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, the statue was vandalized.

In the 1970s, the statue became home for many of the Black Student Movement's demonstrations. After LAPD officers were found not guilty in the Rodney King trial of 1992, students gathered at the monument to speak out and share their thoughts. In 1997, a Martin Luther King Jr. Day march culminated at Silent Sam. In 2015, the statue was once again vandalized.

Of course, we are all familiar with the most recent events. Following riots and protests on UVA's campus in Charlottesville, Virginia, several protests have occurred at the Silent Sam monument. Many students have called for this semester to be "Sam's Last Semester," and the university has asked the state for permission to take the monument down.

However, since Roy Cooper granted permission, no further action has been taken. Divisions have grown among students and administration over what to do about Silent Sam. There is now a 24-hour occupation of the monument by interested student groups.

I surveyed 440 current UNC students from the freshman and sophomore class on their opinions regarding Silent Sam. I also interviewed 25 students to hear their full opinions.

The majority of students think that Silent Sam should be moved to a museum. As sophomore Chloe Boyd put it, "While it's important to acknowledge our history, UNC needs to be an inclusive environment, and I think Silent Sam should be moved to a museum or a cemetery." Most students think that, while Silent Sam is important to university history, it should be moved to somewhere less central.

Many students expressed concern with what the statue represents in the minds of students and Chapel Hill residents, especially following the Charlottesville protest. Sophomore Roan Urquhart said, "I don't think Silent Sam should be destroyed, but it may represent something that UNC doesn't necessarily want to say about itself. I think it should be moved to a less public area of campus or a museum."

Sophomore Jamey Cross echoed this, saying, "I think there's definitely a place for [historical monuments like Silent Sam], but it doesn't need to be so public."

Junior Lauren Wilkinson articulated some students' reasoning, saying, "[Silent Sam] seems to be a symbol of the South's previous support of slavery and racism, and, now, groups that still hold those ideologies...[as they] come out to support and agree with inequality." She added that since the monument was not installed during or immediately following the Civil War, it seems slightly inappropriate, taking away from the Table Statue also located in McCorkle Place.

Sophomore Martha Bennett said, "I think that the statue's purpose was moreso focused on the students of UNC who had to leave their education to go fight in the war. I don't see it as a symbol of the Confederacy, but rather as a symbol commemorating that sacrifice, not necessarily glorifying the cause the Confederacy was fighting for." Bennett agreed that construction many years after the war could come off as inappropriate.

Many students said that they saw no problem with the statue, no reason for the protests, and no reason to take it down. This group was evenly balanced with those that said Silent Sam should be destroyed, though people with these more extreme ideas for action were more reluctant to be interviewed on the issue.

A student (who has asked to remain nameless) said, "...the statue honors ALL alumni that fought in the Civil War, so I'm not sure why people want it down. I do not see the statue as racist. It's been on campus since the 1900s and was put there by the Daughters of the Confederacy. Honestly, I think the riot was unsafe and should not have happened. It was very one-sided. If you were against the statue coming down, it seemed like it might cause violent reactions."

Violence is a very real concern for many students on campus, and many of those with whom I talked said that as long as protests on either side remained peaceful, they had no real opinion.

Twenty-four-hour occupation of the monument began shortly after the mayor of Chapel Hill, Pam Hemminger, asked that the statue be taken down. It has not really impacted university life for most students, though it looms large in many students' minds that the occupation and protests continue to occur.

Regardless of what you think should be done about Silent Sam, try to keep in mind the wide variety of opinions represented even in this tiny fraction of UNC students. We are a university that frequently boasts of "lifelong learning." That starts with a basic understanding of the opinions of others.

With a statue that represents so many different ideas and values to so many different people, there are certainly a lot of factors involved in the decision for what should be done about it. Try to keep that in mind. We may think that we know the right answer, but everyone thinks they know the right answer.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments